Ecotourism Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development https://silvica.site/tag/ecotourism/ Greening our world through content Wed, 09 Oct 2024 04:01:02 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 https://i0.wp.com/silvica.site/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-silvica_image.jpg?fit=32%2C32 Ecotourism Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development https://silvica.site/tag/ecotourism/ 32 32 162136420 15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development http://silvica.site/nature-based-solutions-examples/ Thu, 21 May 2020 18:17:14 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=958 We have developed 15 examples of nature-based solutions that we think could help in reducing pressures in the environment

The post 15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

The concept of nature-based solutions (NBS) could be confusing and abstract. After all, from fossil fuels to plastics, humans have always relied on nature for development. Regardless, the European Union defines NBS as ‘actions which are inspired by, supported by or copied from nature.’ A more detailed article on NbS definition is also published in Silvica. An advantage of nature-based solutions is that they are ready to be deployed. We have outlined nature-based solutions examples in this post.

1.      Tree Growing

Growing trees is a solution to a myriad of contemporary challenges. Chief among them is mitigating the effects of climate change. Trees are plants, so they absorb carbon dioxide through the process of photosynthesis. Planting billions of trees around the world is one of the most practical ways of absorbing excessive amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Scientists estimate that 1.7 billion hectares of current treeless lands have a potential for tree growth.  As a nature-based solution example, tree planting also assists in improving biodiversity, soil, air, and water quality.

2.      Renewable energy

The types of renewable energy that could be useful NBS include solar, wind, hydroelectricity, and biofuels power. The advantages of renewable energy are aplenty. For starters, renewable energy produces lesser emissions compared to fossil fuels. Additionally, renewable energy sources are flexible in the sense that they can be powered using local resources. The continuous maturation of the renewable energy sector means that the costs of renewables will keep decreasing with time.

3.      Beekeeping

As a nature-based solution example, beekeeping does tick most of the boxes. When evaluated against the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), beekeeping can help achieve SDGs one, two, three, five, eight, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, and fifteen. The sad news is that bees are disappearing, yet they are vital components of our ecosystem. For instance, they are significant pollinators of flowering plants.

Have you ever watched the Silence of the Bees documentary? 

4.      Ecotourism

Is it possible for your travel to benefit the local community and the environment at the same time? Yes, it is! When you practice ecotourism, communities and conservation benefit. The International Ecotourism Society defines it as ‘responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the wellbeing of the local people, and involves interpretation and education.’ The problem is that there is a lot of greenwashing in ecotourism. Operators would offer mass tourism but market it as ecotourism. As a traveler, ensure that you do your research well.

Watch a video about Ecotourism 

5.      Payment for Ecosystem Services

Environmental services can be categorized into ecological goods, regulating services, supporting services, and cultural services. Presently, environmental benefits are undervalued or lack value in the financial realm. A central principle in PES is for the environmental services’ beneficiaries to ‘pay’ for the conservation of the same resources. Under PES schemes, farmers and landowners receive payments after implementing previously agreed actions that provide ecological services.

6.      Carbon financing (REDD+ projects)

Carbon financing is an example of PES. It is inevitable for companies to emit carbon into the atmosphere. Regardless, responsible emitters have the option of buying carbon credits from the voluntary markets in carbon financing. For instance, companies could purchase credits from verified REDD+ (reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) projects.

Deforestation is responsible for 15% of global greenhouse emissions; thus, stopping deforestation has a significant impact on the carbon equation. Remember, about 80% of above-ground terrestrial carbon stocks and 40% of soil carbon are in forest ecosystems.

7.      Protected areas

Protected areas are the backbone of biodiversity conservation. National parks, conservancies, reserves, ranches, and community conservation areas are among the most common types of protected areas. The coronavirus pandemic supports the idea of respecting and protecting biodiversity. We have the obligation of setting aside significant wilderness areas where biodiversity could thrive. If not, we may interact with dangerous pathogens as the biodiversity will attempt to survive amongst us.

8.      Avoid plastic products as such as possible.

Plastic is a bad boy of global pollution. As such, we should focus on choosing alternatives to plastic when possible or avoiding plastic altogether. Some plausible environment-friendly options include glass, stainless steel, natural fiber cloth, wood, and paper. It is difficult to completely do away with plastic because it lurks in a variety of products, including chewing gums, metal containers, food packaging, diapers, personal care products, cigarette filters, glue, and medical equipment.

9.      Restoring whale population

Surprisingly, whales conservation has an enormous impact on climate change. One whale absorbs up to 33,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide. In comparison, a tree absorbs up to 22 kgs of carbon a year. Moreover, phytoplanktons follow whales. More whales imply more phytoplankton, and phytoplanktons absorb as much as 40% of all carbon dioxide. 

10. Agroforestry

As the name suggests, agroforestry is a combination of agriculture and forestry. In other words, it involves the integration of trees and crops/livestock in the same land. There are plenty of reasons why a farmer would choose to add trees to his/her farming system. Chief among them is soil conservation and additional products from the trees. As one of the nature-based solutions examples, agroforestry is implementable in existing farming systems.

11. Green roofs

Green roofs refer to vegetation cover grown on rooftops. They are also called rooftop gardens or living roofs. The natural-based solution example is particularly relevant to urban dwellers. Green roofs help reduce energy costs as they insulate buildings. Moreover, they assist in reducing the runoff from storms or snows. A typical metropolitan area produces more than five times more runoff compared to a rural area. Green roofs make urban areas ‘less typical’.

12. Urban gardens and green spaces

Like green roofs, urban gardens and green spaces are nature-based solutions for towns and cities. Home gardens have the benefit of improving the food security of an area. According to the World Health Organization, urban green spaces reduce environmental hazards, improve the quality of life of the urban regions, and improve residents’ wellbeing.

13. Organic farming

Conventional agriculture has various adverse effects on the environment. For instance, the use of inorganic fertilizers harms groundwater and biodiversity. In contrast, organic farming reduces some of the negative impacts of modern agriculture as it involves growing crops with reduced or no fertilizer and other synthetic inputs. Consequently, organic farming is compatible with biodiversity conservation.

14. Green infrastructure

The United States Environmental Protection Agency defines green infrastructure as ‘the range of measures that use plant or soil systems, permeable pavement or other permeable surfaces or substrates, stormwater harvest and reuse, or landscaping to store, infiltrate, or evapotranspirate stormwater and reduce flows to sewer systems or to surface waters.’ As such, measures such as green roofs and tree growing in urban areas fall under green infrastructure. Many forward-looking cities are implementing green infrastructure.

15. Green Economy

The end game for the nature-based solution is the transition to a green economy. The focus of a green economy is sustainable consumption and production, social inclusion, resource efficiency, and reduced emissions.

Watch this video to understand Green Economy better. 

Nature-based solutions present practical ways to deal with current environmental problems. However, NBS should complement other actions, not replace them. Policies re important in ensuring that we implement NBS. Regardless, the personal initiative could also enhance the implementation of a green economy. Ask yourself, ‘what natural-based solution examples can I implement to promote sustainable development?’   

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post 15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
958
The potential impacts of Coronavirus on Conservation in Africa http://silvica.site/the-potential-impact-of-coronavirus-on-conservation-in-africa/ Fri, 01 May 2020 10:25:45 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=783 In the long-run, coronavirus impacts on conservation is negative. As tourism income decreases, the threat to conservation in Africa is expected to increase

The post The potential impacts of Coronavirus on Conservation in Africa appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul
May 1, 2020

In the last two months or so, the world of conservation has seen a remarkable transformation in the natural environment following a slow-down of human activities. From the ban of wet markets to cleaner air to free wildlife movements. Consequently, some conservationists have hailed the environmental benefits of the virus. However, we should not be rejoicing yet. The virus may have more significant negative impacts on conservation, especially in Africa. Here are 5 reasons why we think that is the case.

  1. Reduced tourism numbers mean reduced conservation finances

The conservation model in most of Africa relies heavily on hunting and photo-tourism. As travel restrictions and lockdowns are the norms in tackling the virus, there is virtually no tourism in Africa. Consequently, conservation organizations will lack the funds for hiring park rangers, managers, and researchers. In short, the protection in conservation areas is reducing. Meaning there is an opportunity for illegal wildlife trade-which will outdo decades of work by conservationists in Africa.

The tragedy is tourism numbers are unlikely to increase soon, even if the pandemic ends. Coronavirus has severely hit the traditional source markets for African tourism. As of the end of May 2020, In the United States, over 1 million people had the virus.  Similarly, Europe also had about a million cases. Globally, at least 235,000 people had died. Without a doubt, A big chunk of people in the source markets have lost their income and will need to rebuild after the pandemic. Furthermore, we suspect that people will have some phobia in traveling, at least in the short run.

  1. No jobs mean an increase in poaching incidences

Globally, the virus has led to massive job losses across industries. However, developed countries have an array of safety nets for their citizens during the pandemic. For instance, the UK’s government’s furlough scheme guarantees that people unable to work will receive 80% of their income. The same privilege does not exist in Africa. The safety nets for most people in rural Africa is the land and ocean. As a result, people are reverting to bushmeat poaching and overfishing to supplement their food needs. After all, policing is more difficult because conservation organizations are downsizing, while the number of potential poachers is increasing. Rangers and tour guides are likely to poach because they know the wildlife behavior and the policing approach used by conservation organizations.

  1. The virus could make a jump into wildlife

The Coronavirus might have emerged from nature. There is a worry that it may cross over to other wildlife species. Humans and apes share over 95% of DNA. Even mild pathogens in humans can be devastating to apes. The danger of transmitting the virus to apes is a threat to conservation. It is no wonder that some national parks, such as Virunga in the Democratic Republic of Congo, have opted to lockdown.

The danger of infections is not limited to apes. The National Geographic also reports that seven big cats in a New York zoo tested positive for the virus. Potentially, the virus is a threat to the wildlife of Africa, including primates and felids.

Many conservationists favor the precautionary approach in dealing with the virus, especially when dealing with endangered species. The results could be catastrophic if the virus finds its way into Africa’s wildlife.

There is a possibility that coronavirus could be transmitted from humans to wildlife
An olive baboon with a young one. Africa has a huge diversity of wildlife that could be threatened by Covid-19. Image by Mark Jordahl from Pixabay

4.      Delayed actions for nature

The year 2020 was initially perceived as a super year for the conservation of nature. In the months of May through to October, governments were to meet under the UN Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD). A major output of the meeting would have been individual country targets in conserving biodiversity. The CBD announced the cancellation of the conference on 17th March 2020. Such conferences are vital for conservation in Africa as countries identify conservation priorities and pledge support.

Recent evidence show that disease outbreaks are caused by climate change, habitat fragmentation, and biodiversity loss. The last two causes vindicate the importance of CBD conference.

Meetings cannot be held because they do not follow the social distancing principle. Similarly, it means that research and training in conservation has reduced. Although online platforms create opportunities for communication, some aspects of conservation communication are hard to achieve using the online means. Moreover, the infrastructure for effective online communication is lacking in many of Africa’s conservation areas.

5.      Increase in human-wildlife conflicts

Understandably, more people will look at alternatively economic activities following the pandemic. In Africa, the go-to alternative often involves natural resources. The safety net for most people is agriculture-whether crop production or livestock rearing. Such activities mean going into wildlife habitats.

Conflicts arise when wildlife kill livestock or raid crops. Conservation organizations near wildlife areas have some form for consolation to losses suffered by farmers. The problem is these conservation organizations are likely to lack the funds to compensate livestock killed or crops raided. Afterall, as we mentioned in the first point, most conservation efforts rely on ecotourism.

What should be done to save the situation?

Without a doubt, conservation in Africa needs support now more than ever. Species are in real risk of decimation if the situation is left uncontrolled. If anything, the protection of conservation areas should be intensified during the Coronavirus crises. As the virus disrupts the livelihood of people, they are likely to resort to exploiting the environment. The big question is the source of funding for conservation. For now, we think that the best solution is philanthropy and grants. People and funding organizations with the muscle should support the precarious conservation industry in Africa.

The problem is there is a lot of competition for funding. It will be tragic for Africa if governments and funders fail to address conservation needs.

However, the future of African conservation shouldn’t be philanthropy. As conserved areas provide a myriad of environmental goods and services, policies should favour models based on payment for ecosystem services (PES). For instance, carbon stored in the conserved areas of Africa need quantification and verification. Consequently, the credits could be sold in the voluntary markets. In the same way, policies should seek to monetize the environmental benefits of soil, air and water quality that arises because of conservation.

Parting shot

The novel coronavirus has slowed down human activities. As a result, it appears that the environment is breathing as wildlife is roaming freely and air is cleaner in most parts of the world. But we are in a marathon not a sprint. Coronavirus is likely to have negative impacts on the environment in the long-term. In Africa, particularly, the virus has reduced tourism income, which is a main source for funding conservation. When this pandemic is over, Africa should relook its conservation model as the current one is unsustainable.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on my active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views on this blog post are personal

The post The potential impacts of Coronavirus on Conservation in Africa appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
783
What’s in a name? Can you tell the difference between eco, sustainable, and responsible tourism? http://silvica.site/whats-in-a-name-can-you-tell-the-difference-between-eco-sustainable-and-responsible-tourism/ http://silvica.site/whats-in-a-name-can-you-tell-the-difference-between-eco-sustainable-and-responsible-tourism/#comments Sun, 14 Jul 2019 09:17:04 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=391 By David OkulJuly 14, 2019 Africa conservation mainly relies on ecotourism, which covid-19 has halted (Image from Pixabay) A brief discussion of the forms of alternative tourism Any ardent conservationist/traveler has come across the names of sustainable tourism, responsible tourism, and ecotourism. Differentiating the concepts of sustainable tourism, responsible tourism and ecotourism can be confusing. […]

The post What’s in a name? Can you tell the difference between eco, sustainable, and responsible tourism? appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul
July 14, 2019

Alternative tourism forms
Africa conservation mainly relies on ecotourism, which covid-19 has halted (Image from Pixabay)

A brief discussion of the forms of alternative tourism

Any ardent conservationist/traveler has come across the names of sustainable tourism, responsible tourism, and ecotourism. Differentiating the concepts of sustainable tourism, responsible tourism and ecotourism can be confusing. To make it worse, there are even more related concepts in alternative tourism that appear similar. We have outlined the definition of the three key terms and other related concepts of alternative tourism. Also, this article discusses the concept of the three terms.

we offer sustainable tourism consultancy in Kenya on community-based tourism, ecotourism, application of ecotourism kenya awards
Tourism has adverse impacts to the environment as it consumes resources and produces wastes

Tourism has impacts on the people, the planet, and profits. Alternative forms of tourism seek to address some of the adverse impacts o tourism

Sustainable Tourism

The UNWTO (United Nation’s World Tourism Organization) is the authority on sustainable tourism. It defines the term as:

 

“Tourism that takes full account of its current and future economic, social and environmental impacts, addressing the needs of visitors, the industry, the environment, and host communities”

Ecotourism

Many people believe that ecotourism is a subset of sustainable tourism as its niche is natural areas.  The International Ecotourism Society (TIES) defines the term as, “responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of the local people, and involves interpretation and education” (TIES, 2015).

According to UAE Ministry of Economics, ecotourism includes various types such as blue tourism (travel to beaches and seas), yellow tourism (travel to deserts), white tourism (travel to ice areas) and green tourism (travel to areas rich in fauna, and especially flora).

Responsible tourism

Some people claim that responsible tourism is synonymous with sustainable tourism. However, the Cape Town Declaration (2002) and the Center for Responsible Tourism defined responsible tourism as. “tourism that maximizes the benefits to local communities, minimizes negative social or environmental impacts, and helps local people conserve fragile cultures and habitats or species.”

Tourists have always been vital in conservation (Image by Ron Porter from Pixabay

Other terms in Alternative Tourism Concept

Apart from the three terms, there are other terms that are concerned with the sustainable development of tourism. Let start with alternative tourism itself:

Alternative tourism: the opposite of mass tourism. Although mass tourism promoted economic development in terms of jobs, it also resulted in negative effects such as economic leakages, environmental, and social impacts. Alternative tourism aims at addressing the shortcomings of mass tourism.

Overtourism: concerned with the excessive number of visitors leading to negative effects on the host and the environment

Voluntourism: The central principle is that the visitors would give back (do charity events) for the communities in the destination.

Community-based tourism: CBT occurs where visitors are hosted by locals. Communities are the key stakeholders in this model where they exercise greater control and get more benefits that they would receive.

Conscious travel/tourism: it has its basis on the corporate social responsibility that favors values-based triple bottom line approach.

Ethical travel: It basically advocates for people to be mindful of travel choices based on moral values and judgments

Slow tourism: advocates for living as opposed to staying in a destination. That is, visitors need to connect to cultures.

Geo-Tourism: while ecotourism focuses on the flora and fauna, geo-tourism adds the dimensions of the abiotic environment.

Pro-poor tourism: Although controversial, pro-poor tourism seeks to put poverty of host communities at the center of the sustainability debate.

Farm tourism: Also called agrotourism and involves green tourism of farms.

Our Take: A discussion of ecotourism, sustainable and responsible tourism concepts

At Silvica, we deduce that the differences between ecotourism, sustainable and responsible tourism are academic. It is evident that all the definition seek to improve (or at least maintain) the hosts’ life, the natural environment, and the visitor experiences.  As such the three terms oppose the principles of mass tourism and are a form of alternative tourism.

Nevertheless, distinctions between the terms are also apparent. The focus of ecotourism is sustainability in natural areas. From the definition, tourism in ‘unnatural’ places such as cities and historical monuments may not fit the definition of ecotourism. The distinction between sustainable and responsible tourism is less apparent in terms of scope. However, we perceive that the major actors in sustainable tourism are the business people while the tourist bears more responsibility in responsible tourism. In other words, destination managers need to make their destination sustainable while tourists need to ensure that their travel is responsible.

Further, Harold Goldwin, an authority in sustainable and responsible tourism makes a distinction between the concepts. He claims that sustainability is a goal which can be achieved when people take responsibility.  In other words, responsible tourism includes all actions (mostly little) that individuals can take to make tourism more sustainable. In contrast, sustainable tourism is concerned with long-term changes in tourism that target at reducing the negative impacts of tourism while promoting the positive ones. Sustainable tourism targets global issues such as climate change.

In a nutshell, sustainable tourism, ecotourism, and responsible tourism share a similar goal. They are all types of alternative tourism based on the principles of the three-pillared approach to sustainability (environmental, social, and economic), although ecotourism has an intense focus on environmental aspects. Both travelers and operators need to ensure that they incorporate principles of ecotourism, sustainable, and responsible tourism to ensure that the travel and tourism industry is improved (or at least maintained) for the benefits of the future generations.

References and Resources

David Okul is a freelance writer, and a PhD student at a Kenyan university

The post What’s in a name? Can you tell the difference between eco, sustainable, and responsible tourism? appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
http://silvica.site/whats-in-a-name-can-you-tell-the-difference-between-eco-sustainable-and-responsible-tourism/feed/ 1 391