You searched for forestry - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/ Greening our world through content Thu, 31 Oct 2024 05:37:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://i0.wp.com/silvica.site/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-silvica_image.jpg?fit=32%2C32 You searched for forestry - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/ 32 32 162136420 The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) http://silvica.site/the-definition-and-concept-of-nature-based-solutions-nbs/ Wed, 09 Oct 2024 03:36:51 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1548 The definition of nature-based solutions (NbS) is problematic leading to confusion

The post The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

Nature-based Solutions may be a buzzword that is becoming ubiquitous in various spaces. However, do you know the NbS definition is quite vague? In this article, we will attempt to define the concept.

Various bodies have presented NbS definition. Some of the common definitions include:

  • Actions to protect, conserve, restore, sustainably use, and manage natural or modified terrestrial, freshwater, coastal, and marine ecosystems, which address social, economic, and environmental challenges effectively and adaptively, while simultaneously providing human well-being, ecosystem services and resilience and biodiversity benefits” (UNEA 2022).

PS: The UNEA definition is among the most commonly used definitions of NbS, but there are others as well, such as:

  • Strategies to address societal challenges through actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural and modified ecosystems, benefiting people and nature at the same time”(IUCN)
  • Solutions that are completely based on elements and direct inputs from nature, and are not managed by man or industrial elements
  • Actions inspired by, or supported by, or copied from nature to face social, environmental, and economic challenges.

Barbara and Joan proceed to list 20 definitions of NbS definition and concepts.

NbS definitions are blurry and general to clearly indicate which solutions could termed as NbS. In many cases, the blurry nature emanates from the observation that NbS involves the integration of various scientific fields, and where various experts view it through the lens of their respective disciplines.

NbS Definition Discussion

The concept of using nature to benefit people is not new, but the global interest in the concept has intensified over the years. Still, there is debate on what NbS are and the strategies for integrating them to address contemporary environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and land degradation.

Nature-based solutions use the natural functions of ecosystems to tackle some of the pressing environmental challenges. A key concept in NbS is protection, sustainable use, conservation, and restoration. As such, actions that minimize human impacts on nature such as waste reduction are not considered as NbS.

Despite an array of NbS definitions, a core principle in NbS is ‘working with nature rather than against it”.  Apart from inspiration by nature, other common features of NbS include addressing societal challenges, provision of multiple benefits, and economic efficiency.

It can also be helpful to define NbS by what it is not. Some of the exclusion criteria identified by Barbara and Joan (2020) include:

  • Lack of functioning ecosystems
  • Random actions that lack proper planning
  • Negative/no impacts on biodiversity
  • Copy-paste implementation

Similarly, the IUCN Global Standard for NbS includes 8 criteria that frame green/blue interventions as NbS actions. These criteria include

  1. Addressing societal challenges: The challenge must be identified as a priority for those who are or may be directly affected by the project
  2. Landscape/seascape level interventions: The design of NBS recognizes interactions between economy, society, and ecosystems
  3. Biodiversity gain: Design must proactively seek to enhance the functionality and connectivity of ecosystems
  4. Economic viability: if not addressed, NbS projects are at risk of being short-term
  5. Governance capacity: at minimal, NbS should align with prevailing legal and regulatory provisions.
  6. Equitable trade-off: Trade-offs cannot be avoided but they must be effectively and equitably managed.
  7. Adaptive management: Regular monitoring and evaluation to present an evidence-based foundation.
  8. Mainstream with jurisdictional context: Interventions designed to align with international, sectoral, national, and other policy frameworks

From the discussion, it is clear that any green/blue action is not necessarily an NbS. Regardless, Silvica has compiled some possible examples of NbS actions. Based on the definition in this article, examples of the NbS should aim at fitting the criteria specified.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1548
Concepts of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and SOM http://silvica.site/concepts-of-soil-organic-carbon-soc-and-som/ Fri, 09 Aug 2024 04:03:15 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1539 Soil organic carbon and soil organic matter are interellated concepts that could be key in carbon markets going forward

The post Concepts of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and SOM appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
By David Okul

SOC is a measurable part of soil organic matter (SOM). SOM is notoriously difficult to measure and makes up 2-10% of soil. It contributes to carbon sequestration, soil structure, moisture retention, and biological functions of soils.

SOM is divided into living and dead components and varies from recent to century-old inputs. Its matter includes dissolved organic matter, particulate organic matter, humus, and resistance organic matter.

Estimating SOM from SOC

A conversion factor of 1.724 (to SOC) provides a reasonable estimate of soil organic matter for most purposes. The assumption is based on the observation that organic matter is 58% carbon.

However, Douglas Prybil (2010) refutes the claim. He claims that the factor is too low for most soils as the median conversion factor is 1.9 from their study. Their study concluded that a factor of 2 would be more practical as the values range from 1.4 to 2.5.

In summary, the factor of 1.724 is based on early studies and needs urgent inspection or revision.

SOC Sequestration

SOC sequestration refers to the process where carbon dioxide is transferred from the atmosphere into the soil as organic carbon. The process starts with photosynthesis where atmospheric carbon dioxide is transferred to organic compounds. The compounds are subsequently incorporated into the soil via plant residues and root exudates. Apart from that, other sources of SOC include:

  • Byproducts of animal and microbial activity
  • Organic compounds incorporated through dead plants and leaves with the assistance of subterranean organisms.

SOC sequestration is fronted as one of the ways in which climate change could be mitigated. It is argued that small increases of SOC in very large areas of agricultural and pastoral lands would significantly reduce atmospheric Carbon dioxide.

Various strategies could help optimize SOC sequestration potential including:

  • Conservation tillage: it involves minimal soil disturbance
  • Crop rotation: it helps to vary plant residues
  • Cover cropping: These are often plowed under the ground to add more carbon
  • Organic amendments: For instance compost and manure that increase organic matter in the soil

The potential of SOC sequestration is influenced by other factors such as

  • Rainfall
  • Soil erosion
  • Temperature
  • Sediment deposition

For the reduction to be permanent, the organic matter would be in a stable or resistant faction. Scientists estimate that grasslands have the potential to sequester 6.5 billion metric tonnes per year and close to 1.85 billion metric tonnes of carbon per year for croplands.

Measuring SOC is not a simple task as sampling needs to be systematic to represent the entire field. As SOC is dynamic, measurements are often associated with some degree of uncertainty.

The restoration of grassland ecosystems is explored as a means of accelerating SOC sequestration as soils store climatically significant amounts of SOC. Future research needs to focus on factors that influence sequestration rates, the development of accurate monitoring techniques, and the establishment of policies conducive to sequestration.

Concluding Remarks

The science of SOC sequestration is rapidly evolving and is incorporating the use of AI and satellite imagery. Given the expanse of grassland and agricultural land, we think that SOC sequestration offers a feasible solution for SOC sequestration. Monitoring SOC could greatly enhance carbon markets as both avoidance and reduction carbon projects could be developed from soil-related conservation activities.

Additional reading

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-08636-wQuantification of Soil Organic Carbon – Comparison of Wet Oxidation and Dry Combustion Methods

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-021-00333-1A protocol for measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification of soil organic carbon in agricultural landscapes

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years of experience in donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post Concepts of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and SOM appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1539
IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology Overview http://silvica.site/iucn-global-ecosystem-typology/ Mon, 27 May 2024 04:53:18 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1533 Startpoint in measuring biodiversity is defining ecosystem types

The post IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology Overview appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Biodiversity monitoring has a vital measurement problem despite the understanding that stocktaking of biodiversity variables plays a critical part in conservation. A common approach in monitoring is using a basket of metrics as it is impossible to measure all the biodiversity variables in an ecosystem.

It goes without saying that the first step of indicator development is developing a clear and agreeable understanding of ecosystem types and subtypes for indicators. IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology is an agreed ecological classification framework that is recommended for renowned environmental accounting standards such as the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA EA). It is a product of critical review and input from leading ecosystem scientists in the world. Furthermore, World Conservation Congress Marseille 2020, voted for a global ecosystem typology under resolution 061.

The IUCN Global Ecosystem typology is a classification system based on hierarchy. At the upper level, it defines ecosystems based on their convergent ecological functions but distinguishes ecosystems with contrasting assemblages in the lower levels.

Higher Level Classification

The top level includes five global realms. These include terrestrial, subterrestrial, freshwater, marine, and the atmosphere. Transitional realms are the intersection between the global realms as variation in nature is continuous.

The second level identifies 25 biomes. These ecosystems are created by human activities that drive and maintain their activity. The traditional definition of biomes involves the classification of continental-scale vegetation with major climate types. Modern definitions also have a basis in the terrestrial vegetation formations but also consider functional and evolutionary processes.

Level 3 has 108 ecosystem functional groups that include ecosystems within a biome with dependencies. The ecosystem functioning groups were developed by identifying key gradients in biomes and major species traits that vary among them. For example, water deficit, seasonality, temperature, nutrient deficiency, fire activity, and herbivory are the gradient filters in the terrestrial environment.

Detailed description and reference to the high-level typology https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2020-037-En.pdf 

Lower Level Classification

The first three levels focus on the functional properties of the ecosystem compared to the next three levels which focus on biogeographic and compositional features. These include biogeographical ecotypes, global ecosystem type, and sub-global ecosystem type. These lower levels of classification are often derived directly from ground observation.

  • SEEA-EA recommends biogeographic ecotypes (or ecoregions) for national and subnational and not for supranational approaches such as the EU
  • Like biogeographical ecotypes, both global and sub-global ecosystem types are already in use in the national structures and could be linked to the upper levels.

Concluding Remarks

The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology presents a viable and practical framework to define the scope and context for biodiversity monitoring. It was developed by a collaboration of many reputable biogeographers around the world. As such, it remains ideal for ecosystem classification and structure. A pertinent critique of the typology is the observation of a great degree of overlap between the various classes. Moreover, some areas of their mapping are inaccurate because of human modification. Regardless, it presents an important starting point for monitoring. Furthermore,  the typology recognizes 3  high levels of classification as coarse. As such, it is upon projects/researchers to refine their classification from steps four through six

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology Overview appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1533
REDD+ Justification and Criticism http://silvica.site/redd-justification-and-criticism/ Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:50:14 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1504 Insurmountable evidence show how man is destructive to the environment

The post REDD+ Justification and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

This article is in draft phase. Final version will be published on 7th February 2024

Globally, the agriculture, forestry and land use change is a major net emitter of greenhouse gases. It is estimated that the sector contributes 23% of GHG. As such, forest conservation and avoided deforestation are attractive alternatives for climate change mitigation. Against this background, the UNFCCC introduced REDD+ (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries). The Warsaw Framework provide the basic rules for REDD+ including safegurds for people and the environment, national forest monitoring systems, forest reference levels, MRVs, etc.

In theory, REDD+ is of benefit to both developed and developing countries as developed countries can reduce emissions at low cost by supporting REDD+ while developing countries receive financial incentives to reduce deforestation.

 

Critism of REDD+

Weakened rules

There is concerned that some of the requirements for environmental safeguards, benefit sharing process,a nd participatory approaches are not stringent enough.

Over issuance of credits

There are some reports of REDD+ projects overissuing carbon credits. An important aspect of REDD+ project is calculating the baseline which climate action can be measured.

However, most standards publicly list project information and have space for public comments. More importantly, baselines are reassessed during validation. Recently, Verra revised its baseline assessment period from 10 years to 6 years.

Furthermore, standard agencies often engage group of experts in developing standards and reviewing projects.

Concluding remarks

Scrutiny of carbon projects help to improve transparency and the effectiveness of offset projects.

Tropical forests are reducing. The fact is that projects similar to REDD+ do assist in reducing the rates of deforestation. A number of studies support this claim Malan et al (2024), Everland (2023) and Ropsind et al (2019)

 

 

More reading

https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13021-023-00228-y

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post REDD+ Justification and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1504
To Value or Not to Value Nature http://silvica.site/nature-valuation/ Sun, 31 Dec 2023 14:41:26 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1498 Insurmountable evidence show how man is destructive to the environment

The post To Value or Not to Value Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The idea of putting a price on nature is controversial.

The major argument is that nature has an intrinsic value and valuation turns the natural world into a subsidiary of the corporate economy. As such, the proponents of intrinsic value of nature argue that there is no need of putting a price on nature, as it has its own rights independent of human use.

Additionally, some argue that putting monetary value on biodiversity implies that it can be divisible into smaller parts. There is a danger of financialization of nature in large open markets. Many entrepreneurs are seeing potential profits in marketization of nature and are supporting for their development.

Pricing natural assets could also imply that they could be substitutable for other products elsewhere. Many natural assets are not fungible and could not be substituted for other assets. Unlike capital in finance, we cannot invest, borrow, or spend natural capital. The treatment of natural assets as capital could be catastrophic for nature.

Some aspects of the natural environment are harder to quantify than others. For instance, valuing cultural value is notoriously difficult. Supporting services are also hard to quantify. Conversely, for provisional services, simple market values can be determined.

The question remains, is it better to put an imperfect quantification on nature, or continue BAU that regard natural world as valueless?

This is a very tough debate, but my personal opinion is that since the globe is increasingly capitalistic, nature should be valued and integrated in the contemporary capitalist system.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post To Value or Not to Value Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1498
Fair and Transparent Benefit Sharing In CBT http://silvica.site/fair-and-transparent-benefit-sharing-in-cbt/ Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:35:27 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1491 CBT is a promising segment as modern tourists are looking for unique and authentic experiences

The post Fair and Transparent Benefit Sharing In CBT appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The participation of local communities through sharing the benefits of tourism is one of the major characteristics of community participation in tourism. The benefits that can emanate from CBT activities include amenities, facilities, income, and employment opportunities. As the community expands, local governments provide additional budget in forms of road improvement and direction signs in and around the community.

Among the most common problems with CBTOs in Africa, and probably the world, is the benefit-sharing mechanism. In many cases, CBTOs would function efficiently until money, or other forms of benefit, comes in. It is important for a CBTO to develop and agree on a benefit-sharing mechanism before embarking on the CBT journey. 

 

 

 

Local culture is a common CBT attraction

How can a CBTO ensure benefit sharing?

The first step for an effective benefit-sharing mechanism in the CBT is to have an identifiable membership for the CBTO. It is common for CBTO members to register with a CBTO and pay predetermined membership fees. Additionally, communities should be able to identify their stakeholders with clarity

  1. Well-established institutions: Members of any community have different backgrounds and interests. It is important that they have a legitimate local community institution that is respected by the community and provides an interface for engaging with other stakeholders such as investors and local governments.  A CBTO can establish committees to deal with various issues that are pertinent to its operations.
  2. Well defined property rights. The CBTO resource inventory should be documented and the members made aware of their ownership and power rights.
  3. Local communities must get genuine benefits from community-based tourism activities in their localities. A sharing procedure must be defined and communicated to all stakeholders beforehand. Table 6.1 below shows how a CBTO can share benefits that accrue from hiking activities

Table 6.1: A simple benefit-sharing mechanism for a CBTO

A CBTO charges KES 1000 for a hiking experience to a local hill. The benefits are shared as follows:

  • KES 300 provides local motorbike transport and water for the hiker (30%)
  • KES 200 is a guiding fee for the guide (20%)
  • KES 150 is given to the owner of the land where the hill is located (15%)
  • KES 100 is sent to the tour operator or the referral who brought the client (10%)
  • KES 250 is retained by the CBTO for administration (licenses and office space) and the rest is retained as profit that will be shared as a dividend at the end of the year.
  1. If communities are denied fair and transparent benefit-sharing procedures, it is likely that conflicts will arise in the CBT.
  2. Assist the community in improving their access to basic services (such as water, sanitation, education and hygiene). This can be achieved by the group undertaking activities related to corporate social responsibility.
  3. Establish schemes to assist the vulnerable members of the community (e.g. disabled, orphans, widows)
  4. Encourage basic training of business operations to CBT staff and owners e.g. in aspects of cash flow, budget surplus/deficit, and retaining part of the profits to reinvest

Concluding remarks

Benefit sharing is a make or break for community-based tourism projects. Transparency is key in ensuring a fair framework. A predetermined benefit sharing is most ideal, from my experience. However, some CBT enterprises choose having a board to distribute benefits.

David Okul is a Kenyan environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Fair and Transparent Benefit Sharing In CBT appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1491
Social Well Being and Human Dignity In CBT http://silvica.site/social-well-being-and-human-dignity-in-cbt/ Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:28:18 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1483 CBT is a promising segment as modern tourists are looking for unique and authentic experiences

The post Social Well Being and Human Dignity In CBT appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

A CBT project is sustainable as long as it produces a net positive benefit to the community. In general, the objective of community-based tourism development is to improve the community’s level of economic, social, and environmental advancement. Examples of benefits include the creation of community resources such as health services, education, and infrastructure for the community itself. In addition, CBT must benefit all stakeholders involved for it to last. The benefit enjoyed by the local community usually comes in the form of financial and non-financial gains.

Subsequently, rural and community-based tourism could increase the opportunities for social contact and exchange among the local community and the visitors. In addition, rural tourism benefits the community as it focuses on the protection and preservation of local nature and heritage.

Local culture is a common CBT attraction

How can a CBTO ensure social well-being and guarantee human dignity?

  1. Develop a social policy with the community members and proactively communicate and update periodically. A CBT social policy should:
  • Respect local cultures by ensuring that the activities undertaken by the CBT should not undermine their culture or the cultures of neighboring communities
  • Promote gender equality by practicing equity in the distribution of roles and resources to women, youth, and men.
  • Uphold dignity and respect i.e., apart from local cultures, the CBT has to make efforts to respect and treat with dignity the cultures of its visitors.
  • Support child protection whereby the CBTO ensures that the social policy protects children from negative aspects of sex tourism and child labor.
  1. Promote Collaboration and networking. This is consistent with principle 2 for CBT. Collaboration and networking ensure that the CBTO understands stakeholders’ need for social well-being.
  2. Implement efficient marketing strategies: A CBTO needs to be market-efficient to be able to sustain its social activities. Information on effective marketing methods can be obtained from the SUS-TOUR Marketing Guidelines[1] and the SUS-TOUR DIY toolkit on Marketing.[2]
  3. Promote the conservation of natural resources. Conservation of community resources needs to be one of the main characteristics of sustainable tourism development. In this subject area, conservation refers to the preservation of the culture of a local community, the heritage in the area, the environment, and nature that represents the identity of the tourist place. Ventures that promote conservation promote the social well-being of the community. More on conservation is available in principle 8.
  4. Develop a code of conduct for the CBTO members. The code of conduct refers to rules that guide the social norms and practices of groups and organizations. It assists in ensuring that members understand the dos and don’ts of an organization.
  5. Develop a code of conduct for tourists. CBTOS needs to have a code of conduct as visitors may have cultures and beliefs that are dissimilar to them. Each CBTO should develop a code of conduct and communicate it to the tourists during the initial briefing.
  6. Develop a code of conduct for the other business activities including food and beverage, guides, accommodation, etc. A code of conduct is an important tool in improving the quality of products and experiences offered by CBT.
  7. Discourage the abuse of drugs among the community members
  8. Disseminate information on the contemporary social issues in the area such as HIV and AIDs, tribalism, and corruption as they relate to the CBTO.

[1] Georgina, Guillen-Hanson, Leisinger Matthias, and Deng Yang. 2017. “SUS-TOUR Marketing Guideline.” http://www.sustourkenya.org/index.php/2016-07-01-15-04-15/downloads/send/3-downloads/8-marketing-guideline.

[2]  Yang, Deng. 2018. “SUS-TOUR CBT DIY Toolkit- Module 3: Communication and Marketing.”

 

Sample Code of Conducts

Code of Conducts

David Okul is a Kenyan environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Social Well Being and Human Dignity In CBT appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1483
Some Statistics on How Man is Destroying Nature http://silvica.site/some-statistics-on-how-man-is-destroying-nature/ Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:46:52 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1474 Insurmountable evidence show how man is destructive to the environment

The post Some Statistics on How Man is Destroying Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The natural environment is fundamental to humans’ survival on Earth. It also contributes to our economy and culture. Unfortunately, our ways of life are destructive to the ecosystem.

It is easy to overlook nature and think that everything will always be there. However, multiple evidence shows that nature can be destroyed.

Humans destroy the environment in several ways including:

  • Over-extracting natural resources
  • Pollution of air, soils, and water
  • Destroying landscapes

The reasons for the destruction are pretty simple. Our overpopulation and overconsumption are leading to more urbanization, agriculture, and entertainment. 

Read an article highlighting the major global environmental issues, mainly caused by humans.

Collapse of Species

The bullet points below illustrate how biodiversity is shifting. Links in the bullet points redirect to articles across websites proving the statements.

  • Livestock accounts for 62% of global mammalian biomass while humans account for 34%. Only 4% of the biomass represents wildlife species. The estimate is a startling reminder of the reduced biodiversity.
  • Poultry accounts for 61% of the world’s birds’ biomass. Some estimates claim that poultry biomass could be as much as 80%. In contrast, 4-10% of bird species are farmed as poultry.
  • Over 12% of the known species are faced with the danger of extinction. Over 30% of land and 75% of freshwater resources are utilized for food production.
  • Lost over a third of tigers and elephant populations since counting began.
  • Further, these wild areas are concentrated in about 20 countries. The wilderness areas are often the homes of indigenous communities.
  • Wildlife populations have reduced by 68% since 1970. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the drop has been over 94%.
  • Over a million species are in danger of extinction
  • One of every 3 freshwater species is faced with extinction threat.
  • IUCN has listed 77 animals as extinct in the wild. The organization’s Red List identifies 41,000 species as threatened, which represents 28% of the total species researchers assess.
  • 3 million species in the Amazon are threatened by human-caused ecosystem collapse.
  • Introduced species have significant negative impacts on the environment. The number of alien species has increased as humans move across habitats. Alien species could have dramatic impacts on the species richness of native habitats.

Habitats destruction

Habitat destruction is a leading cause of species decline.

  • Only 25% of the terrestrial land is wilderness area. That is, areas not affected by human footprint. These areas are mainly in Canada, Russia, Brazil, and Australia. Similarly, only 33% of marine-based environments are truly wild. Even more concerning is a study that claims only 3% of the earth has ecological integrity and ‘intactness’).
  • 26% of the planet (ice-free land) is used for livestock, with 33% of cropland for livestock feeds. Animal agriculture is responsible for 17% of greenhouse gas emissions. Global meat consumption has more than doubled since 1990.
  • Land use change, especially for agriculture leads to biodiversity loss and land and water degradation. In 2021 alone, 9.3 million acres of tree land in the tropics were converted to other land uses.

Water Natural resources are not spared too

The cascading effect of Nature degradation

  • Nature degradation has a cascading effect on the environment. Some of these consequences are listed as:

    • Reduction of ecosystem stability: intact ecosystems are more resilient to pressures such as climate change
    • Reduction of ecosystem services: Nature degradation often also reduces the functionality of various ecosystem services such as pollination, water provision, soil formation, carbon sequestration, and climate regulation
    • Species extinction: The loss of one species has a cascading effect on other species as well.
    • Food security: Biodiversity is vital for food security as it provides genetic resources, pollination services, and natural pest control. The destruction of nature may reduce the agricultural productivity.
    • Human health as losing biodiversity may mean losing potential treatment of diseases. Moreover, decline of ecosystem services, such as water and air purification, may increase the exposure to pollutants and pathogens
    • Economy loss: nature supports various industries including tourism, fisheries, and agriculture. The destruction of natural resources has implications for the economic development of a region
    • Loss of cultural values, in particular, of indigenous people.
    • Reduced resilience to climate change
    • Natural disaster resistance: natural disasters such as floods, storms, and landslides are less severe in areas of healthy and diverse ecosystems.

What Can We Do?

The Sustainable Development Goals recommend the following changes to reverse or reduce human impacts on nature:

Conserve wetlands, which are important breeding grounds for 40% of the worlds’ species

  • Fight ocean acidification
  • Manage Foodwaste
  • Manage pollution
  • Protect forests
  • Protect key biodiversity areas
  • Enhance climate finance to help fight climate change

The Good News

Evidence shows that conservation efforts may cause the recovery of some species. For instance, the black tail reef shark in Australia and the Nepalese Tiger have shown remarkable recovery rates by conservation efforts.

Concluding remarks

Humans are depleting the natural resources at an alarming rate. At the current rate, we will need 2.5 earths by 2050 to satisfy the consumption rate. Some of the overexploited natural resources include sand, trees, soils, fossil fuels, and water. I perceive the capitalistic mindset to be the central cause of the degradation and destruction of the environment. The solutions have to be capitalistic too. We know that natural resources have value. It is time to assign value to the resources and ensure that ecosystem services are rightly priced. It shouldn’t end there as well. The money obtained from the PES should be appropriately invested in conservation and the communities undertaking conservation activities. I feel that the environment is at a tipping point. If we don’t rationally manage it, more disasters may await us. Whether it is the effects of climate change or the proliferation of killer diseases. I believe Covid-19 could have been an environmental disaster.

REFERENCE

Most of the references are in the links within the text. Other references include

Humans Destroying Ecosystems: How to measure our impacts on the environment (2023) https://sentientmedia.org/humans-destroying-ecosystems/extirpate

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post Some Statistics on How Man is Destroying Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1474
How Humans Are Dependent On Nature http://silvica.site/humans-dependent-on-nature/ Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:41:53 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1430 We depend on nature for basic needs, health and economic growth.

The post How Humans Are Dependent On Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Humans have become obsessed with technological ingenuity to enhance their future survival, but ignoring their dependence on nature would be foolish. While the future of humanity is focused on artificial technology and solutions, the role of the natural world in human existence is underestimated. Nature offers so many benefits to humans. Today, close to 8 billion people across the globe are directly or indirectly dependent on nature. Humans depend on nature for many things, including the source of basic needs, economic growth, and health.

Dependence on Nature for Basic Human Needs

 Nature is the number one source for all basic human needs like clean water, food, air, shelter, and clothing. These basic needs are essential for human survivors. They are sourced from nature directly or indirectly.

Air: Humans depend on nature for clean air to support their existence. Nature produces air by interacting with land, plants, and the atmosphere. For example, trees absorb Carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to produce oxygen. Other natural resources like soil, wetlands, and plants help clean the air, giving humans access to fresh air.

The ocean produces over half of the world’s oxygen through oceanic plankton. However, marine life consumes most of the oxygen produced in the oceans.

Food: Humans are heavily dependent on food. Nature provides humans with a balanced diet containing carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, and minerals essential for healthy living. The natural sources of food include plants and animals. Humans source their food from fruits, roots, stems, seeds, leaves, and flowers of plants. The plants also produce other food-related products like oil from seeds, sugar from sugarcane stems, and species from dried leaves and roots. Humans also depend on animals as a food source, directly or indirectly. Animals are rich sources of proteins. Animals produce milk, meat, and eggs.

Water: The three natural sources of water are underground water, rain, and surface water. Humans access underground water by drilling boreholes. Rainwater falls in the form of snow or precipitation. Humans can collect rainwater by building dams or using containers. Surface water involves water sources above the surface and is easily accessible to humans. Examples of surface water sources include wetlands, lakes, rivers, oceans, and seas. Humans rely on nature as the direct drinking water source and irrigating crops. The body needs clean drinking water to function correctly and promote good health. Humans also use water to irrigate lands and grow crops, thus promoting food security.

Food comes from nature

Dependence on Nature for Economic growth

Natural resources play a primary role in promoting economic activities and sustainability; nature directly contributes to human economic activities by providing humans with raw materials for producing goods and services.

Energy Generation

Humans are reliant on nature for energy generation. Energy is the main economic driver for human activities. Humans require energy in their homes, factories, and cities to promote producing goods and services for financial gain. Nature provides humans with energy from different sources. The primary energy source has been fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas, contributing to up to 80% of the global energy needs. Nature also provides humans with renewable energy like solar, wind, hydropower, and geothermal. Renewable energy has enabled humans to produce green energy, which helps promote environmental and economic sustainability for human growth.

Raw Materials

Also, humans depend on nature for raw materials to produce goods. Nature is a rich source of raw materials essential for making goods. The raw materials are sourced from plants, animals, and underground minerals. Plants are the primary source of raw materials for producing goods such as medicine, paper, furniture, clothes, art, etc. Humans also use animal byproducts like skins to make leather products like shoes, handbags, and clothes. They also excavate to access underground minerals like gold, copper, oil, ore, zinc, silver, nickel, tin, and iron, to mention but a few, for energy production, metals, and gems, which promote economic development.

Nature-based Tourism

            Nature is rich in biodiversity, ecosystems, and natural features, attracting tourists worldwide. Humans use these natural attraction sites to promote nature-based tourism to diversify their economic growth. Tourism contributes to economic growth in various ways, such as creating employment, increasing income, and infrastructure development. Nature-based tourism includes bird watching, hiking, fishing, visiting parks, photography, camping, and hunting.

Dependence on Nature for Good Health

Nature Promotes Good Mental Health

            Nature has a significant impact on promoting the well-being of humans, making them reliant on nature for good health. Research has shown that human interaction with nature reduces stress. Stress lowers the quality of one’s health by leading to unhappiness, anxiety,  and high blood pressure. Exposure to nature (e.g., walking in natural areas) promotes happiness and emotional well-being.

Nature Treats Illnesses

Nature is a major source of medicine and therapy. Humans rely on nature to extract raw materials from plants and animals to produce generic medications for treating cardiovascular diseases. Also, interacting with nature helps relieve pain and promote comfort to patients. The research found that interacting with natural environments has a soothing effect, which helps to reduce psychological and chronic pain. Humans depend on nature to relieve pain instead of using medications, as there are no side effects.

Concluding Remarks

Humans depend on nature for survival, economic growth, and good health. This dependence shows how nature is essential for human sustainability and existence in the future. An attack on nature is an attack on human survival in the future. While humans view technology as their future, they should remember nature as they depend so much on it. Humans should focus on protecting nature to ensure that it continues to provide essential needs for its survival and growth. The connection between human beings and nature is undeniable.                                           

All goods we use will either need natural resources (e.g foods that require minerals from soil) or will embody natural resources (e.g. a car will contain iron ore).  The problem is that with economic development and population growth, more and more natural resources are being extracted. This unsustainable resource use is the cause of some of the major environmental problems of today.

Read more about natural resources in this book

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 12 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The view in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post How Humans Are Dependent On Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1430
Partnerships with relevant stakeholders for CBT http://silvica.site/partnerships-with-relevant-stakeholders-for-cbt/ Sun, 23 Jan 2022 04:33:16 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1400 CBT is a promising segment as modern tourists are looking for unique and authentic experiences

The post Partnerships with relevant stakeholders for CBT appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Stakeholder participation has been described as an essential element in successful sustainable tourism development as it helps coordinate and balance decision-making based on the needs and interests of relevant parties. The goal of stakeholder participation is to balance the power between all parties to promote a win-win situation in tourism development. Participation is therefore defined as “a process of involving all stakeholders including local government officials, local citizens, architects, developers, business people, and planners in such a way that decision-making is shared.

'Our success has really been based on partnerships from the very beginning.'
Bill Gates
Billionaire
Local culture is a common CBT attraction

CBT partnerships is a vital piece of success

It is difficult for CBT to make it alone in the journey of tourism. It is always a good idea to seek synergetic partnerships. The partnerships need to build up the CBT.

Most CBT initiatives get initial funding from an external source, such as donors, government, or development agencies. Over time, the resources diminish and the community needs to depend on tour operators for marketing.

The value of partnerships could be vindicated by the fact that it is the Sustainable Development Goal 17.

How CBT partnerships can be developed with relevant stakeholders?

  1. Identify and select local service providers. A CBTO can look for several service providers including tour guides, transport services, farmers (to supply food), caterers, cleaning services, and security personnel. It is important not to compromise on the qualities set when selecting local service providers
  2. Approach the local authorities for partnerships.  The emergence of county governments in Kenya presents an opportunity for CBTOs to collaborate with them. Most county governments in Kenya have a tourism department that can assist CBTOs in various aspects such as marketing, training, and business development guidance. Furthermore, local tourism is a devolved function under the Constitution of Kenya. This provides an opportunity for productive engagement with CBTOs.
  3. Approach other CBTOs in the area. A CBTO stands a better chance of achieving success if it partners with other community-based organizations. For starters, CBTOs should always consider sourcing their goods and services from other CBOs. Moreover, they can partner with other CBTOs if they offer complementary services. It is a good practice to partner with other CBTOs as they might help in referring guests when they have excessive orders.
  4. Partner with the tour operators or tour guides. Tour operators (TOs) with a good understanding of the market demand can plan trips for large numbers of visitors. When partnering with TOs to craft and market unique experiences for the visitors, their business skills and market access can be valuable assets for enhancing CBTOs’ professional operation and marketing activities.  
  5. Develop a formal communication strategy to communicate with stakeholders.  Formal communication channels transmit information such as goals, policies, and procedures for an organization. This information can be delivered through newsletters and official communications. Ideally, a CBTO creates a monthly or quarterly newsletter to communicate the activities of the enterprise. Emails and networks such as LinkedIn are good channels for conveying formal communication.
  6. Develop an informal communication strategy. Informal communication channel occurs in a relaxed atmosphere. Communication through social media networks such as Facebook and WhatsApp can also be used. 
  7. Develop an unofficial communication strategy. This occurs between stakeholders in social functions such as weddings and funerals. CBTO members need to use the opportunities of social communication to enhance the partnership of stakeholders.
  8. Ensure that the CBTO has a communication channel that communicates with the various stakeholders regularly e.g. weekly, monthly, or as the need arises.

Recap

Honestly, creating viable partnerships for CBT initiatives is a complicated task. It may sound simple, but it is not. While working with CBT initiatives in Kenya, I have observed key lessons in creating partnerships:

Lesson 1: keep the interest of the community at the heart of all partnerships. You rather forgo a partnership than commit to a union that may bring discord among the CBT members. It is vital for CBT members to get involved and participate in partnership decisions.

Lesson 2: Delays are inevitable. Some CBT and CBOs are quite informal, as a result, they are not run professionally. It is good to learn to work with delays and unprofessionalism while trying to improve relationships. For CBTs, patience pays

Lesson 3: Develop networks for partnerships. Work at maintaining networks because some develop into viable partnerships 

Tasks for CBT Initiatives

List the current partners of your CBTO

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

 

List potential partners for your CBTO

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

 

How does the CBTO communicate to its partners?

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

David Okul is a Kenyan environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Partnerships with relevant stakeholders for CBT appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1400