Environmental Management Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/category/environmental-management/ Greening our world through content Mon, 27 May 2024 05:00:51 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 https://i0.wp.com/silvica.site/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-silvica_image.jpg?fit=32%2C32 Environmental Management Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/category/environmental-management/ 32 32 162136420 IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology Overview http://silvica.site/iucn-global-ecosystem-typology/ Mon, 27 May 2024 04:53:18 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1533 Startpoint in measuring biodiversity is defining ecosystem types

The post IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology Overview appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Biodiversity monitoring has a vital measurement problem despite the understanding that stocktaking of biodiversity variables plays a critical part in conservation. A common approach in monitoring is using a basket of metrics as it is impossible to measure all the biodiversity variables in an ecosystem.

It goes without saying that the first step of indicator development is developing a clear and agreeable understanding of ecosystem types and subtypes for indicators. IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology is an agreed ecological classification framework that is recommended for renowned environmental accounting standards such as the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA EA). It is a product of critical review and input from leading ecosystem scientists in the world. Furthermore, World Conservation Congress Marseille 2020, voted for a global ecosystem typology under resolution 061.

The IUCN Global Ecosystem typology is a classification system based on hierarchy. At the upper level, it defines ecosystems based on their convergent ecological functions but distinguishes ecosystems with contrasting assemblages in the lower levels.

Higher Level Classification

The top level includes five global realms. These include terrestrial, subterrestrial, freshwater, marine, and the atmosphere. Transitional realms are the intersection between the global realms as variation in nature is continuous.

The second level identifies 25 biomes. These ecosystems are created by human activities that drive and maintain their activity. The traditional definition of biomes involves the classification of continental-scale vegetation with major climate types. Modern definitions also have a basis in the terrestrial vegetation formations but also consider functional and evolutionary processes.

Level 3 has 108 ecosystem functional groups that include ecosystems within a biome with dependencies. The ecosystem functioning groups were developed by identifying key gradients in biomes and major species traits that vary among them. For example, water deficit, seasonality, temperature, nutrient deficiency, fire activity, and herbivory are the gradient filters in the terrestrial environment.

Detailed description and reference to the high-level typology https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2020-037-En.pdf 

Lower Level Classification

The first three levels focus on the functional properties of the ecosystem compared to the next three levels which focus on biogeographic and compositional features. These include biogeographical ecotypes, global ecosystem type, and sub-global ecosystem type. These lower levels of classification are often derived directly from ground observation.

  • SEEA-EA recommends biogeographic ecotypes (or ecoregions) for national and subnational and not for supranational approaches such as the EU
  • Like biogeographical ecotypes, both global and sub-global ecosystem types are already in use in the national structures and could be linked to the upper levels.

Concluding Remarks

The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology presents a viable and practical framework to define the scope and context for biodiversity monitoring. It was developed by a collaboration of many reputable biogeographers around the world. As such, it remains ideal for ecosystem classification and structure. A pertinent critique of the typology is the observation of a great degree of overlap between the various classes. Moreover, some areas of their mapping are inaccurate because of human modification. Regardless, it presents an important starting point for monitoring. Furthermore,  the typology recognizes 3  high levels of classification as coarse. As such, it is upon projects/researchers to refine their classification from steps four through six

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology Overview appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1533
Payment for Ecosystem Services: Theoretical background http://silvica.site/payment-for-ecosystem-services-theoretical-background/ Sun, 31 Mar 2024 19:50:51 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1525 Our unsustainable use of resources is causing major environmental concerns. Some of which include overpopulation, climate change and pollution.

The post Payment for Ecosystem Services: Theoretical background appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By Ntagusa Moonyoi

Payment for ecosystem services is a new conservation management paradigm that recognises that those enjoying the benefits of natural resources should directly pay the people conserving or protecting the resources. 

I. Overview of the concept of Payment for Ecosystem Services.

Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) is a market-based mechanism aimed at incentivizing the conservation and sustainable management of natural resources by compensating individuals or communities for the valuable services provided by ecosystems. The concept recognizes that ecosystems offer a wide range of benefits, known as ecosystem services, such as clean water provision, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and soil erosion prevention, among others.

Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) has emerged as a compelling approach to address the complex challenges of environmental degradation and sustainable development. As human activities continue to exert unprecedented pressure on the Earth’s ecosystems, the need for innovative conservation strategies has become increasingly urgent. In this context, PES offers a promising framework for incentivizing the conservation and sustainable management of natural resources by recognizing and valuing the services provided by ecosystems. The concept of ecosystem services, encompassing the myriad benefits that ecosystems provide to society, underscores the fundamental importance of conserving and restoring natural habitats. From clean water provision and climate regulation to pollination and cultural heritage, ecosystem services are essential for human well-being, economic prosperity, and ecological resilience. However, the degradation of ecosystems, driven by factors such as deforestation, habitat destruction, and pollution, threatens the delivery of these vital services. In response to these challenges, PES has emerged as a market-based mechanism that seeks to internalize the externalities associated with ecosystem services and align economic incentives with environmental goals. By compensating landowners and resource managers for the services provided by ecosystems, PES aims to promote conservation, restoration, and sustainable management practices. This approach not only helps to conserve biodiversity and protect critical habitats but also supports livelihoods, enhances resilience to climate change, and fosters social equity. The theoretical foundations of PES draw upon insights from economics, environmental science, and governance theory, highlighting the importance of property rights, market failures, and institutional arrangements in shaping human behavior and resource management outcomes. Implementation mechanisms of PES involve stakeholder engagement, payment structures, monitoring systems, and institutional integration to ensure transparency, accountability, and effectiveness. While PES holds promise as a tool for promoting environmental conservation and sustainable development, it also faces challenges related to additionality, equity, transaction costs, and social acceptance. Addressing these challenges requires adaptive management, stakeholder collaboration, and policy innovation to maximize the effectiveness and equity of PES initiatives.

II. Theoretical Foundations of PES

The theoretical foundations of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) are rooted in economic theory, environmental economics frameworks, and institutional economics perspectives. These theoretical underpinnings provide a conceptual basis for understanding the rationale behind PES and guiding its design and implementation. Here are key theoretical foundations of PES:

  1. Market Failures and Externalities: PES addresses market failures related to the mismanagement of natural resources and the undervaluation of ecosystem services. Traditional markets often fail to account for the full social and environmental costs of resource use, leading to overexploitation and degradation of ecosystems. PES aims to internalize these externalities by creating financial incentives for the conservation and sustainable management of ecosystems.
  2. Coase Theorem and Property Rights: The Coase theorem highlights the role of property rights in resolving externalities through negotiation and voluntary agreements. PES schemes rely on clear property rights and contractual arrangements between buyers and sellers of ecosystem services to internalize the external costs and benefits associated with ecosystem conservation.
  3. Environmental Economics Frameworks: PES is supported by various environmental economics frameworks, including cost-benefit analysis, welfare economics, and market-based instruments. Cost-benefit analysis helps assess the economic efficiency of PES interventions by comparing the costs of conservation measures with the benefits derived from ecosystem services. Welfare economics provides insights into the distributional impacts of PES payments and the allocation of resources to maximize social welfare. Market-based instruments, such as cap-and-trade systems and environmental taxes, offer policy tools for implementing PES and incentivizing sustainable resource management.
  4. Institutional Economics Perspectives: Institutional economics perspectives emphasize the importance of institutions, governance structures, and property rights arrangements in shaping human behavior and resource management outcomes. PES governance mechanisms, including property rights regimes, contracts, and payment schemes, play a critical role in defining the rules of the game and facilitating cooperation among stakeholders. Institutional economics also highlights the role of transaction costs, enforcement mechanisms, and social norms in shaping the effectiveness and sustainability of PES arrangements.

III. Implementation Mechanisms of PES

The implementation mechanisms of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) encompass a range of strategies and approaches designed to facilitate the exchange of ecosystem services between providers (sellers) and beneficiaries (buyers). These mechanisms involve various stakeholders, payment structures, and monitoring systems to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of PES schemes. Here are key components of the implementation mechanisms of PES:

  1. Identification and Valuation of Ecosystem Services: The first step in implementing PES is identifying the ecosystem services to be targeted for conservation or restoration. This involves assessing the ecological functions and benefits provided by ecosystems, such as carbon sequestration, water purification, or habitat provision. Valuation methods, including market-based approaches, stated preference surveys, and cost-based methods, are used to quantify the economic value of ecosystem services and determine appropriate payment levels.
  2. Stakeholder Engagement and Negotiation: PES schemes require the involvement of diverse stakeholders, including landowners, resource users, government agencies, NGOs, and private sector actors. Stakeholder engagement processes facilitate dialogue, negotiation, and consensus-building among stakeholders to define PES objectives, roles, responsibilities, and payment arrangements. Participatory approaches ensure that PES schemes reflect the interests and preferences of local communities and stakeholders.
  3. Design of Payment Structures and Contracts: PES schemes involve the development of payment structures and contractual agreements that specify the terms and conditions of the PES transactions. Payment structures may include one-time payments, recurrent payments, or performance-based incentives, depending on the nature of the ecosystem service and the preferences of stakeholders. Contracts outline the rights and obligations of buyers and sellers, including the duration of the agreement, the scope of services provided, and the conditions for payment.
  4. Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) Systems: Effective monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems are essential for ensuring transparency, accountability, and the integrity of PES transactions. MRV systems track the delivery of ecosystem services, assess the effectiveness of conservation measures, and verify compliance with contractual obligations. Monitoring techniques may include remote sensing, field surveys, and participatory monitoring approaches, while reporting mechanisms provide stakeholders with information on PES outcomes and impacts.

IV. Effectiveness and Challenges of PES

The effectiveness of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) initiatives in achieving their environmental and socio-economic objectives varies depending on various factors, including the design of the scheme, the context in which it operates, and the stakeholders involved. While PES holds promise as a tool for incentivizing conservation and sustainable management of ecosystems, it also faces several challenges that can hinder its success. Here, we explore both the effectiveness and challenges of PES:

Effectiveness:

  1. Conservation Outcomes: PES schemes have demonstrated effectiveness in achieving targeted conservation outcomes, such as biodiversity conservation, habitat restoration, and watershed protection. By providing financial incentives to landowners and resource managers, PES encourages the adoption of land management practices that enhance ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation.
  2. Economic Efficiency: PES can be economically efficient by internalizing the externalities associated with ecosystem services and aligning economic incentives with environmental goals. Cost-effectiveness analysis has shown that PES can be a cost-effective approach compared to alternative conservation strategies, particularly when considering the long-term benefits of ecosystem services.
  3. Social Benefits: PES initiatives can generate social benefits by supporting rural livelihoods, empowering local communities, and fostering social cohesion. By providing financial incentives for conservation, PES schemes can contribute to poverty alleviation, income diversification, and improved access to ecosystem services for marginalized communities.
  4. Innovation and Learning: PES has stimulated innovation in conservation finance, governance, and technology, leading to the development of new approaches and tools for ecosystem management. PES initiatives provide opportunities for learning and adaptive management, allowing stakeholders to experiment with different approaches and adapt to changing environmental and socio-economic conditions.

Challenges:

  1. Additionality and Leakage: Ensuring additionality—the delivery of additional ecosystem services beyond what would have occurred without the PES intervention—and addressing leakage—the displacement of environmental impacts to other areas—are key challenges in PES implementation. Without proper safeguards and monitoring mechanisms, PES payments may incentivize activities that merely shift environmental degradation elsewhere rather than addressing the underlying drivers of ecosystem decline.
  2. Equity and Distributional Impacts: PES schemes may exacerbate existing inequalities by disproportionately benefiting wealthy landowners or exacerbating land tenure conflicts. Ensuring equitable distribution of PES benefits among stakeholders, particularly marginalized groups and indigenous communities, remains a challenge. Moreover, PES may incentivize the exclusion of certain stakeholders or the privatization of common resources, leading to social tensions and conflicts.
  3. Transaction Costs and Administrative Burdens: PES schemes often entail high transaction costs associated with designing, implementing, and monitoring agreements, particularly in complex socio-ecological contexts. Administrative burdens, including legal and bureaucratic requirements, can hinder the scalability and cost-effectiveness of PES initiatives, particularly for small-scale projects or in resource-constrained settings.
  4. Market and Policy Uncertainties: PES initiatives are subject to market uncertainties, policy changes, and external shocks that can affect the stability and viability of the schemes. Fluctuations in ecosystem service values, changes in government priorities, and shifts in consumer preferences can undermine the financial sustainability of PES arrangements and discourage long-term investment in conservation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Payment for Ecosystem Services offers a promising pathway towards achieving environmental sustainability and fostering socio-economic development. By integrating ecological, economic, and social considerations, PES has the potential to catalyze transformative change and create a more sustainable and equitable future for people and the planet. However, realizing this potential requires concerted efforts from governments, civil society, the private sector, and local communities to overcome challenges and harness the full benefits of PES for present and future generations.

REFERENCES

Ntangusa Moonyoi is a Bachelor of Commerce at Strathmore University Kenya. 

The post Payment for Ecosystem Services: Theoretical background appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1525
Environmental Externalities: Research Paper http://silvica.site/environmental-externalities-paper/ Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:16:11 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1511 Our unsustainable use of resources is causing major environmental concerns. Some of which include overpopulation, climate change and pollution.

The post Environmental Externalities: Research Paper appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By Ntagusa Moonyoi

Our production and consumption systems are causing externalities. In this paper, we discuss some of the pertinent concepts on environmental externalities.

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

Brief overview of environmental externalities

Environmental externalities refer to the unintended and often unaccounted-for impacts that economic activities have on the environment, affecting parties not directly involved in those activities. These externalities can be positive or negative and encompass a wide range of environmental issues. The concept is rooted in market failures, as the costs or benefits associated with these external effects are not reflected in the prices of goods and services in the marketplace.

Key Characteristics:

  1. Positive and Negative Externalities: Positive externalities result in beneficial effects on the environment, such as ecosystem restoration or biodiversity conservation. Negative externalities, on the other hand, lead to harmful consequences, including pollution, deforestation, and habitat destruction.
  2. Scope of Impact: Environmental externalities can affect air, water, soil, biodiversity, and ecosystems. The scale of impact can range from local to global, with some externalities contributing to broader issues like climate change.
  3. Market Failures: Traditional markets often fail to account for the environmental costs associated with production and As a result, economic agents may not fully consider the long-term consequences of their actions, leading to inefficient resource allocation.
  4. Interconnectedness: Environmental externalities often manifest in interconnected and complex ways. For instance, air pollution can contribute to climate change, affecting weather patterns and ecosystems globally.

Examples of Environmental Externalities:

  1. Air Pollution: Emissions from industries and vehicles contribute to air pollution, affecting human health, degrading air quality, and contributing to climate
  2. Water Pollution: Agricultural runoff, industrial discharges, and improper waste disposal can contaminate water sources, leading to aquatic ecosystem degradation and risks to human health.
  3. Deforestation: Clearing land for agriculture and logging can result in loss of biodiversity, disrupt ecosystems, and contribute to carbon emissions.
  4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases, contributing to global warming and climate change.

Mitigation Strategies:

 

  1. Regulation and Policy: Governments implement environmental regulations, such as emission standards and pollution controls, to address externalities and promote sustainable practices.
  2. Economic Instruments: Taxes, subsidies, and cap-and-trade systems provide economic incentives for businesses and individuals to internalize environmental costs and adopt greener practices.
  3. Technological Innovation: Advances in technology, such as renewable energy sources and eco-friendly production methods, play a crucial role in mitigating environmental

 

 

Importance of addressing environmental externalities

Addressing environmental externalities is of paramount importance for several reasons, reflecting the interconnectedness between human activities, the economy, and the health of the planet. The significance of addressing environmental externalities can be understood through the following key points:

  1. Ecosystem Health and Biodiversity:

Preservation of Ecosystems: Environmental externalities often contribute to habitat destruction, deforestation, and pollution, leading to the degradation of ecosystems. Addressing externalities is crucial for preserving biodiversity and maintaining the health of natural systems.

  1. Human Health and Well-being:

Air and Water Quality: Pollution resulting from environmental externalities, such as air and water pollution, directly impacts human health. Addressing these externalities is essential for ensuring clean air and water, reducing the prevalence of respiratory diseases and waterborne illnesses.

  1. Long-term Economic Sustainability:

Resource Conservation: Many environmental externalities involve the inefficient use of natural resources. Addressing these externalities promotes sustainable resource management, ensuring the availability of essential resources for future generations.

  1. Climate Change Mitigation:

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Environmental externalities, particularly those related to the burning of fossil fuels, contribute significantly to climate change. Addressing these externalities is critical for mitigating global warming and its associated impacts, such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems.

  1. Social Equity and Justice:

 

Disproportionate Impact: Environmental externalities often impact marginalized communities and vulnerable populations more severely. Addressing externalities is essential for promoting environmental justice and ensuring that the burdens and benefits of environmental actions are equitably distributed.

  1. Regulatory Compliance and Legal Frameworks:

Ensuring Compliance: Addressing environmental externalities is essential for complying with environmental regulations and legal frameworks. Businesses and individuals must internalize the costs associated with their activities to avoid legal repercussions and contribute to a sustainable future.

  1. Innovation and Technological Advancement:

Stimulating Green Technologies: The need to address environmental externalities drives innovation in green technologies and sustainable practices. This, in turn, fosters economic growth, job creation, and the development of industries focused on environmental sustainability.

  1. Global Cooperation and Diplomacy:

International Collaboration: Many environmental challenges, such as air and water pollution or climate change, require global cooperation. Addressing environmental externalities fosters international collaboration and diplomatic efforts to find collective solutions to shared environmental problems.

  1. Public Awareness and Education:

Informed Decision-Making: Addressing environmental externalities involves raising public awareness and promoting environmental education. Informed individuals are more likely to make sustainable choices and support policies that contribute to environmental well-being.

Thesis statement outlining the scope and purpose of the paper.

This research paper seeks to comprehensively explore the concept of environmental externalities, investigating their diverse manifestations, economic implications, and the imperative of addressing them. Through an examination of case studies, economic analyses, and policy responses, the paper aims to underscore the significance of mitigating environmental externalities for the preservation of ecosystems, human health, economic sustainability, and the collective well-being of current and future generations.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Definition and classification of environmental externalities

Environmental externalities refer to the unintended side effects or consequences of human activities on the environment, affecting parties not directly involved in those activities. These externalities can be either positive or negative and arise when the costs or benefits of an action are not fully borne by the individuals or businesses responsible for that action. In other words, environmental externalities represent the spillover effects of economic activities on the broader ecosystem, often leading to outcomes that are not accounted for in market transactions.

 

Classification of Environmental Externalities:

  1. Positive Externalities:

Definition: Positive environmental externalities occur when the benefits of an economic activity extend beyond the individuals or entities directly involved.

Example: Planting trees not only benefits the individual or organization planting them but also improves air quality and provides habitat for wildlife, creating positive externalities.

  1. Negative Externalities:

Definition: Negative environmental externalities occur when the costs of an economic activity are borne by parties not directly engaged in that activity.

Example: Industrial pollution affecting nearby communities or water contamination from agricultural runoff are instances of negative externalities.

  1. Air Pollution:

Definition: Activities such as industrial production and transportation release pollutants into the air, affecting air quality and human health.

Example: Emission of particulate matter and gases from factories leading to respiratory problems in neighboring communities.

  1. Water Pollution:

Definition: The contamination of water bodies by pollutants from agricultural runoff, industrial discharges, or improper waste disposal.

Example: Discharge of chemicals from a factory into a nearby river, impacting aquatic life and potentially affecting downstream communities.

  1. Deforestation:

Definition: The clearing of forests, often for agriculture or logging, resulting in the loss of biodiversity and disruption of ecosystems.

Example: Clear-cutting of forests for timber or to make way for agricultural activities, leading to habitat destruction and soil erosion.

  1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions:

Definition: The release of gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, contributing to global warming and climate change.

Example: Burning fossil fuels for energy, releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and contributing to the greenhouse effect.

 

Historical context and evolution of the concept

The concept of externalities, including environmental externalities, has roots in economic thought and policy discussions dating back to the 19th century. Over time, the understanding of how economic activities impact the environment and society has evolved. Here is a simplified overview of the historical context and evolution:

  1. Classical Economics (18th-19th centuries):

Adam Smith (1776) and David Ricardo (1817) do not explicitly address environmental concerns in relation to public goods provision. One plausible explanation is that, during that time, industrialization and urbanization had not advanced to a stage where intellectuals acknowledged the significant impact on the environment. Additionally, environmental matters were not yet considered within the scope of topics that economists were anticipated to scrutinize as part of social development.

During the classical economic era, thinkers like Adam Smith and David Ricardo focused on individual self-interest and the idea that markets, if left to operate freely, would lead to optimal outcomes. However, their theories did not explicitly address the unintended consequences of economic activities on the broader society or the environment.

  1. Pigouvian Economics (20th century):

In the early 20th century, economist Arthur Pigou introduced the concept of externalities to address market failures. He argued that when the actions of individuals or businesses impose costs or benefits on others not involved in the market transaction, markets may fail to allocate resources efficiently. Pigou proposed government intervention through taxes or subsidies to internalize externalities.

  1. Tragedy of the Commons (1968):

Garrett Hardin’s influential essay, “The Tragedy of the Commons,” highlighted the overuse and degradation of shared resources when individuals act in their self-interest. Hardin’s work underscored the need for collective action and regulation to address environmental challenges.

  1. Coase Theorem (1960):

Ronald Coase proposed the Coase Theorem, suggesting that if property rights are well-defined and transaction costs are low, private parties can negotiate and find efficient solutions to externalities without government intervention. This theorem contributed to the understanding of how markets and property rights influence environmental outcomes.

  1. Environmental Movement (Late 20th century):

The rise of the environmental movement in the mid-20th century drew attention to pollution, resource depletion, and ecosystem degradation. Increased public awareness and advocacy led to the establishment of environmental regulations and agencies in many countries.

  1. Sustainable Development (1980s-present):

 

The concept of sustainable development gained prominence in the 1980s, emphasizing the need to balance economic growth with environmental protection and social equity. International agreements, such as the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, highlighted the interconnectedness of economic, social, and environmental goals.

  1. Integration into Economic Models (Modern era):

Environmental externalities are now integrated into economic models, policy discussions, and sustainability frameworks. Concepts like the triple bottom line (considering economic, social, and environmental factors) emphasize a more holistic approach to decision-making.

Throughout this historical evolution, the concept of environmental externalities has transitioned from a niche economic idea to a central theme in discussions about sustainable development and responsible resource management. The ongoing challenges related to climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution continue to underscore the importance of addressing environmental externalities in contemporary policy and decision-making.

 

 

Key studies and research on environmental externalities

Several key studies and research efforts have significantly contributed to our understanding of environmental externalities. These studies have explored the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of externalities, providing valuable insights into their causes, consequences, and potential mitigation strategies. Here are a few notable examples:

  1. “The Economics of Welfare” by Arthur Pigou (1920):

Arthur Pigou’s work laid the foundation for the concept of externalities. In “The Economics of Welfare,” Pigou introduced the idea that when the actions of individuals or businesses impose costs or benefits on others, markets may fail to allocate resources efficiently. He proposed government intervention to address these externalities, a concept now known as the Pigovian tax.

  1. “The Tragedy of the Commons” by Garrett Hardin (1968):

Garrett Hardin’s influential essay discussed the overuse and depletion of common resources, highlighting the concept of the tragedy of the commons. Hardin argued that individuals acting in their self-interest could lead to the degradation of shared resources, emphasizing the need for collective action and regulation.

  1. Coase Theorem by Ronald Coase (1960):

Ronald Coase’s paper “The Problem of Social Cost” introduced the Coase Theorem, challenging the traditional view that externalities required government intervention. Coase argued that, under certain conditions, private parties could negotiate and find efficient solutions to externalities without government involvement.

  1. “Pollution, Prices, and Public Policy” by Thomas Crocker (1966):

 

Thomas Crocker’s paper is a seminal work in the development of emissions trading systems. Crocker discussed how creating a market for pollution permits could provide an economically efficient solution to environmental externalities associated with pollution.

  1. “The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change” (2006):

The Stern Review, led by economist Sir Nicholas Stern, examined the economic impacts of climate change. The report emphasized the importance of considering the external costs of carbon emissions and highlighted the economic rationale for taking action to mitigate climate change.

  1. “The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)” (2008):

TEEB is a comprehensive study initiated by the United Nations that assesses the economic value of biodiversity and ecosystem services. The report emphasizes the often-unaccounted- for economic benefits provided by nature and highlights the externalities associated with biodiversity loss.

  1. “The Dasgupta Review: The Economics of Biodiversity” (2021):

Commissioned by the UK government, the Dasgupta Review explores the economic implications of biodiversity loss. Authored by Sir Partha Dasgupta, the report emphasizes the need to incorporate nature’s value into economic decision-making and addresses the externalities arising from the neglect of biodiversity.

TYPES OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES.

Air pollution: Sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies

Air pollution refers to the presence of harmful substances, such as particulate matter, gases, and chemicals, in the Earth’s atmosphere in concentrations that can be detrimental to human health, the environment, and overall well-being.

  1. Sources of Air Pollution:
  • Combustion of Fossil Fuels: Burning coal, oil, and natural gas for energy production releases pollutants like sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate
  • Vehicle Emissions: Combustion engines emit pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and particulate matter.
  • Industrial Activities: Factories and industrial processes release pollutants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).
  • Agricultural Practices: Agricultural activities contribute to air pollution through ammonia (NH3) emissions and the release of agricultural dust.

 

  • Waste Management: Improper disposal and treatment of waste can result in the release of pollutants into the air.
    1. Impacts of Air Pollution:
  • Health Effects: Air pollution can lead to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, exacerbate existing conditions, and cause premature deaths.
  • Environmental Degradation: Pollutants can harm ecosystems, soil quality, and water bodies, impacting biodiversity and the health of plants and animals.
  • Climate Change: Greenhouse gas emissions from air pollution contribute to global warming, affecting weather patterns and ecosystems.
  • Ozone Depletion: Certain pollutants, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), contribute to the depletion of the ozone layer, leading to increased UV radiation reaching the Earth’s
    1. Mitigation Strategies:
  • Transition to Clean Energy: Encouraging the use of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, reduces reliance on fossil fuels and decreases air pollution.
  • Improved Transportation: Promoting public transportation, electric vehicles, and sustainable urban planning can reduce vehicle emissions.
  • Stringent Emission Standards: Implementing and enforcing strict emission standards for industries and vehicles helps limit the release of harmful pollutants.
  • Afforestation and Green Spaces: Planting trees and creating green spaces can help absorb pollutants and improve air quality.
  • Waste Management Practices: Proper waste disposal and recycling reduce the release of pollutants from landfills and incineration.
  • Regulatory Measures: Governments can enact and enforce air quality regulations to limit emissions from various sources and protect public health.
  • Public Awareness and Education: Informing the public about the sources and impacts of air pollution encourages responsible behavior and supports community-driven efforts to improve air quality.
  • Technological Innovation: Investing in and adopting cleaner technologies, such as emission control devices and pollution abatement technologies, can contribute to reducing air pollution.

 

Water pollution: Causes, consequences, and regulatory measures

Water pollution refers to the contamination of water bodies, such as rivers, lakes, oceans, groundwater, and other aquatic systems, by the introduction of harmful substances or pollutants.

  1. Causes of Water Pollution:
    • Industrial Discharges: Factories and industrial facilities often release pollutants, including heavy metals, chemicals, and toxins, into water bodies.
    • Agricultural Runoff: The use of fertilizers and pesticides in agriculture can lead to runoff, carrying pollutants such as nutrients and chemicals into rivers and lakes.
    • Wastewater Disposal: Improper disposal of domestic and industrial wastewater can introduce pollutants, including pathogens and chemicals, into water systems.
    • Oil Spills: Accidental or intentional releases of oil into water bodies can have severe environmental consequences, affecting aquatic life and ecosystems.
    • Plastic Pollution: Improper disposal and accumulation of plastic waste in water bodies pose a significant threat to marine life and ecosystems.
    • Urbanization and Stormwater Runoff: Increased urban development leads to increased impervious surfaces, causing stormwater runoff to carry pollutants into water bodies.
  2. Consequences of Water Pollution:
    • Impact on Aquatic Ecosystems: Water pollution can harm fish, plants, and other aquatic organisms, disrupting ecosystems and reducing biodiversity.
    • Health Risks: Contaminated water can pose risks to human health, leading to waterborne diseases and long-term health issues.
    • Economic Impact: Water pollution can negatively impact industries such as fisheries and tourism, affecting local economies.
    • Drinking Water Contamination: Polluted water sources can compromise the quality of drinking water, endangering public health.
    • Loss of Recreational Opportunities: Polluted water bodies may become unsuitable for recreational activities, impacting the quality of life for nearby communities.
  3. Regulatory Measures to Address Water Pollution:
    • Water Quality Standards: Governments set water quality standards that define acceptable pollutant levels in water These standards serve as benchmarks for monitoring and regulatory compliance.
    • Pollution Prevention Plans: Industries may be required to implement pollution prevention plans to reduce the discharge of pollutants into water bodies.

 

  • Wastewater Treatment: Establishing and enforcing regulations on the treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater helps reduce pollutant levels before
  • Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs): Before initiating projects, authorities may require EIAs to assess potential impacts on water quality and ecosystems, ensuring sustainable development.
  • Erosion Control Measures: Implementing erosion control measures, such as vegetative buffers and sediment control structures, helps prevent soil runoff and reduces sedimentation in water bodies.
  • Bans and Restrictions: Prohibiting or restricting the use of certain pollutants, such as specific chemicals or materials, helps prevent their introduction into water systems.
  • Community Engagement and Education: Raising awareness and involving local communities in water protection efforts fosters a sense of responsibility and encourages sustainable practices.

Deforestation: Economic drivers, ecological consequences, and conservation efforts

  1. Economic Drivers of Deforestation:
    • Agriculture: Expansion of agricultural activities, especially for cash crops and livestock, is a significant driver of Large-scale farming often leads to the clearing of vast forested areas.
    • Logging and Timber Production: The demand for wood and timber products contributes to deforestation, as logging operations clear forests for commercial purposes.
    • Infrastructure Development: Road construction, urbanization, and other infrastructure projects can result in deforestation as forests are cleared to make way for roads, buildings, and other developments.
    • Mining: Extractive industries, such as mining for minerals and oil, often require clearing large areas of forests, leading to deforestation.
    • Fuelwood Collection: In many developing regions, reliance on wood for fuel contributes to deforestation as communities harvest trees for cooking and heating purposes.
  2. Ecological Consequences of Deforestation:
    • Loss of Biodiversity: Deforestation leads to the destruction of habitats, resulting in the loss of plant and animal species. Many species may become endangered or extinct.
    • Disruption of Ecosystems: Forest ecosystems are complex and interconnected. Deforestation disrupts these systems, affecting nutrient cycles, water flow, and ecological
    • Climate Change: Forests act as carbon sinks, absorbing and storing carbon dioxide. Deforestation releases stored carbon into the atmosphere, contributing to climate

 

  • Soil Erosion: The removal of trees exposes soil to erosion. Without the stabilizing influence of tree roots, erosion can lead to degraded soil quality and reduced agricultural
  • Disruption of Water Cycles: Forests play a crucial role in regulating water cycles. Deforestation can alter precipitation patterns, leading to changes in local and regional
  1. Conservation Efforts:
    • Protected Areas and Reserves: Establishing and effectively managing protected areas and reserves helps preserve critical ecosystems and biodiversity.
    • Reforestation and Afforestation: Planting trees in deforested areas (reforestation) or areas that were not previously forested (afforestation) helps restore ecosystems and mitigate the impacts of deforestation.
    • Sustainable Logging Practices: Implementing sustainable logging practices, such as selective logging and reduced-impact logging, can minimize the ecological impact of timber production.
    • Community-Based Conservation: Involving local communities in conservation efforts helps build support for protecting forests and ensures that conservation measures are
    • Corporate Responsibility: Encouraging responsible business practices, such as sustainable sourcing of timber and agricultural products, promotes conservation and reduces the economic drivers of deforestation.
    • Policy and Legislation: Governments can enact and enforce laws that regulate land use, logging, and agricultural practices to prevent deforestation.
    • International Collaboration: Global initiatives and partnerships between countries, NGOs, and businesses are crucial for addressing deforestation, especially in regions with high biodiversity and extensive forest cover.

 

 

Greenhouse gas emissions: Trends, consequences, and the role of renewable energy

  1. Trends in Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
    • Global Increase: Over the past century, human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes, have significantly increased the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere.
    • Dominant Sources: The primary sources of GHG emissions include the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas for energy, deforestation, agricultural practices, and certain industrial

 

  • Carbon Dioxide (CO2): CO2 is the most prevalent greenhouse gas emitted by human activities, primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels and land-use changes.
  • Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O): Agriculture, livestock, and industrial activities contribute to elevated levels of methane and nitrous oxide emissions, both potent greenhouse gases.
  1. Consequences of Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
    • Climate Change: The increased concentration of greenhouse gases traps heat in the Earth’s atmosphere, leading to global warming and alterations in climate patterns.
    • Rising Sea Levels: Melting ice caps and glaciers, primarily caused by higher temperatures, contributes to rising sea levels, posing risks to coastal communities and
    • Extreme Weather Events: Changes in climate patterns result in more frequent and severe weather events, including hurricanes, droughts, floods, and heatwaves.
    • Impact on Ecosystems: Altered temperatures and precipitation patterns can disrupt ecosystems, affecting biodiversity, migration patterns, and the health of various
    • Ocean Acidification: The absorption of excess CO2 by oceans leads to increased acidity, negatively impacting marine life, particularly organisms with calcium carbonate shells.
  2. Role of Renewable Energy in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
    • Decarbonization of Energy: Transitioning from fossil fuel-based energy sources to renewable energy, such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal, reduces reliance on carbon-intensive fuels, lowering emissions.
    • Solar Energy: Solar power harnesses sunlight to generate electricity, offering a clean and abundant energy source with minimal environmental impact.
    • Wind Energy: Wind turbines convert wind energy into electricity, providing a sustainable alternative to fossil fuel-based power generation.
    • Hydropower: Generating electricity from moving water helps reduce reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate the environmental impact of traditional energy sources.
    • Geothermal Energy: Utilizing heat from the Earth’s interior for power generation offers a continuous and low-emission energy source.
    • Bioenergy: Biomass and biofuels derived from organic materials can serve as renewable alternatives to traditional fossil fuels.

Renewable Energy Advantages in Emission Reduction:

  • Reduced Carbon Footprint: Renewable energy sources produce little to no direct greenhouse gas emissions during operation, helping to mitigate climate change.

 

  • Energy Independence: Utilizing renewable energy reduces dependence on finite fossil fuel resources, promoting energy security.
  • Job Creation: The renewable energy sector supports job creation and economic growth, fostering a transition to a more sustainable and resilient economy.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES.

Market failures and the role of externalities

  1. Understanding Market Failures:

Market failures occur when the allocation of goods and services by a free market is inefficient, leading to outcomes that do not maximize societal welfare. In a perfectly competitive market, prices reflect both the private costs and benefits of production and consumption. However, market failures arise when certain conditions are not met, resulting in misallocations of resources.

  1. Causes of Market Failures:

Externalities: The presence of externalities, where the actions of producers or consumers impose costs or benefits on third parties not involved in the transaction.

Public Goods: Goods that are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, meaning individuals cannot be excluded from consuming them, and one person’s consumption does not diminish the availability to others.

Imperfect Competition: Monopolies, oligopolies, or monopolistic competition can lead to market power and inefficient outcomes.

Information Asymmetry: When one party in a transaction has more information than the other, leading to adverse selection or moral hazard.

Incomplete Markets: When certain goods or services are not traded in the market, leading to underproduction or overproduction.

  1. Role of Externalities in Market Failures:

Externalities play a significant role in causing market failures. Externalities occur when the production or consumption of goods and services affect third parties who are not part of the market transaction. They can be positive, such as the benefits of education spillovers, or negative, such as pollution from industrial production.

  1. Types of Externalities:

 

Negative Externalities: These occur when the actions of producers or consumers impose costs on third parties not involved in the transaction. For example, pollution from factories negatively impacts the health of nearby residents.

Positive Externalities: Positive externalities occur when the actions of producers or consumers create benefits for third parties. For instance, investments in education not only benefit the individual but also society through increased productivity and innovation.

  1. Consequences of Externalities:

Externalities can lead to inefficient resource allocation, as market prices do not fully account for the external costs or benefits associated with production or consumption. Negative externalities can result in overproduction of goods with harmful effects, while positive externalities may lead to underinvestment in beneficial activities.

  1. Addressing Externalities:

To address externalities and mitigate market failures, policymakers can employ various interventions, including:

Pigouvian Taxes: Taxes levied on producers or consumers to internalize the external costs associated with their actions.

Subsidies: Government subsidies provided to encourage activities that generate positive externalities.

Regulations: Imposing regulations or standards to limit or mitigate the negative impacts of externalities.

Cap-and-Trade Systems: Market-based mechanisms that set a cap on total emissions and allow for trading of emission permits.

  1. Importance of Addressing Externalities:

Addressing externalities is crucial for achieving efficient resource allocation, promoting social welfare, and ensuring environmental sustainability. By internalizing external costs and benefits, policymakers can align private incentives with societal goals, leading to more efficient and equitable outcomes in the market. Failure to address externalities can result in market distortions, environmental degradation, and negative impacts on human health and well-being.

Theoretical frameworks such as Pigouvian taxation and Coase theorem

1.  Pigouvian Taxation:

Definition: Pigouvian taxation, named after economist Arthur Pigou, involves levying taxes on activities that generate negative externalities to internalize the external costs.

Mechanism: The tax is imposed on producers or consumers to align private costs with social costs, thereby reducing the quantity of the harmful activity to the socially optimal level.

 

Rationale: In the presence of negative externalities, market prices do not fully reflect the true costs of production or consumption, leading to overproduction or overconsumption of the harmful good or service. By imposing a tax equal to the external cost per unit, the government internalizes the externality and incentivizes producers or consumers to account for the social costs in their decision-making.

Example: Carbon taxes are a common application of Pigouvian taxation, where a tax is levied on the carbon content of fossil fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.

2.  Coase Theorem:

Definition: The Coase theorem, formulated by economist Ronald Coase, suggests that in the absence of transaction costs and under certain conditions, parties can negotiate and arrive at efficient solutions to externalities privately, without government intervention.

Mechanism: According to the Coase theorem, if property rights are well-defined and transaction costs are low, parties affected by externalities can bargain with one another to reach mutually beneficial agreements. The efficient outcome is independent of the initial allocation of property rights.

Rationale: The Coase theorem challenges the conventional view that externalities always require government intervention to correct. Instead, it highlights the potential for private bargaining and voluntary agreements to internalize externalities efficiently.

Example: In the case of pollution, if property rights are clearly defined and transaction costs are low, affected parties (e.g., polluters and affected communities) can negotiate compensation or mitigation measures to address the externality without government intervention.

Comparison:

Pigouvian Taxation vs. Coase Theorem: While Pigouvian taxation relies on government intervention to internalize externalities through taxes, the Coase theorem suggests that private bargaining can achieve the same outcome under certain conditions. Pigouvian taxation is often favored when transaction costs are high or property rights are difficult to define, whereas the Coase theorem may be applicable in situations where private negotiations are feasible and efficient.

Conclusion:

Both Pigouvian taxation and the Coase theorem offer theoretical frameworks for addressing externalities and achieving efficient outcomes in the presence of market failures. While Pigouvian taxation provides a straightforward mechanism for internalizing external costs through government intervention, the Coase theorem highlights the potential for private bargaining and voluntary agreements to address externalities efficiently. Ultimately, the choice between these approaches depends on the specific context, including the nature of the externality, transaction costs, and the feasibility of private negotiations.

 

Challenges in valuing environmental goods and services

Non-Market Nature: Many environmental goods and services, such as clean air, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, do not have explicit market prices. In the absence of market transactions, valuing these goods and services becomes challenging, as there is no direct monetary exchange to determine their worth.

Complexity and Interconnectedness: Environmental systems are complex and interconnected, with numerous variables and feedback loops. Valuing individual environmental goods or services in isolation may overlook their broader ecological context and the interactions between different components of the environment.

Temporal and Spatial Variability: Environmental goods and services often exhibit temporal and spatial variability, making their valuation more complex. Valuation methods must account for fluctuations in ecosystem conditions over time and differences in environmental attributes across geographic regions.

Subjectivity and Uncertainty: Valuing environmental goods and services involves subjective judgments and value assessments. Different stakeholders may have varying preferences, perceptions, and priorities regarding the value of environmental resources, leading to disagreements and conflicts. Uncertainty surrounding future environmental conditions, ecological dynamics, and human behaviors further complicates valuation efforts.

Methodological Challenges: Existing valuation methods, such as contingent valuation, hedonic pricing, and ecosystem services valuation, have limitations and assumptions that can affect the accuracy and reliability of estimates. Methodological choices, including study design, sample selection, and model specification, can influence valuation outcomes and interpretations.

Distributional Considerations: Valuing environmental goods and services raises distributional issues, as benefits and costs may accrue unevenly across different groups within society.

Ensuring equitable distribution of environmental benefits and addressing environmental justice concerns requires careful consideration in valuation studies. Externalities and Spillover Effects: Environmental goods and services often exhibit spillover effects, where the benefits or costs extend beyond the immediate users or beneficiaries. Valuation efforts must account for these externalities and spillover effects to capture the full social value of environmental resources.

Inadequate Data and Information: Limited availability of data and information on environmental attributes, ecosystem functions, and human preferences can hinder valuation efforts. Improving data collection, monitoring systems, and research infrastructure is essential for enhancing the accuracy and reliability of environmental valuation.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Emerging trends in environmental policy and technology

  1. Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation:

Increasing focus on ambitious climate targets, including net-zero emissions and climate resilience strategies. Emphasis on renewable energy deployment, energy efficiency, and low- carbon technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Integration of climate considerations into all aspects of policymaking, from transportation and agriculture to urban planning and infrastructure development.

  1. Circular Economy and Waste Management:

Shift towards circular economy models aimed at minimizing waste generation and maximizing resource efficiency. Promotion of recycling, reuse, and extended producer responsibility to reduce environmental impacts and conserve resources. Exploration of innovative technologies, such as advanced recycling methods and material recovery, to create closed-loop systems.

  1. Biodiversity Conservation and Restoration:

Recognition of the importance of biodiversity for ecosystem health, resilience, and human well- being. Implementation of biodiversity conservation measures, including protected areas, habitat restoration, and species recovery programs. Integration of biodiversity considerations into land- use planning, agricultural practices, and natural resource management.

  1. Technology and Innovation:

Harnessing technology and innovation to drive sustainable development and address environmental challenges. Advances in renewable energy, clean transportation, and smart infrastructure to reduce environmental footprints and enhance efficiency. Integration of digital tools, data analytics, and remote sensing technologies to monitor environmental changes, improve decision-making, and enhance environmental governance.

Recommendations for policymakers, businesses, and individuals/civil society.

Addressing environmental challenges requires proactive measures and collaborative efforts from policymakers, businesses, and civil society. By adopting holistic approaches to environmental management, embracing sustainability principles, and working together towards common goals, we can create a more resilient and sustainable future for all.

  1. Policymakers: Implement robust environmental regulations that internalize externalities and incentivize sustainable practices. Adopt a holistic approach to environmental management, considering the interconnectedness of ecosystems, social systems, and economic activities. Promote stakeholder engagement and participatory decision-making processes to ensure diverse perspectives are considered in policy Invest in research and innovation to support the development and implementation of effective environmental policies and technologies. Prioritize collaboration and international cooperation to address global environmental challenges and achieve collective goals.

 

  1. Businesses: Integrate sustainability into corporate strategies, operations, and supply chains, considering environmental impacts throughout the product lifecycle. Implement environmental management systems and set measurable targets for reducing emissions, waste, and resource Invest in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and green technologies to reduce environmental footprints and enhance competitiveness. Engage with stakeholders, including customers, employees, and communities, to build trust and support for sustainability initiatives. Embrace transparency and accountability in reporting environmental performance, adhering to global standards and best practices.
  2. Civil Society: Advocate for strong environmental policies and regulations that prioritize the protection of natural resources and public health. Raise awareness and mobilize public support for sustainable practices, conservation efforts, and climate Hold governments and businesses accountable for their environmental commitments through activism, public campaigns, and legal action if necessary. Foster collaboration and partnerships between civil society organizations, academia, and other stakeholders to leverage collective expertise and resources. Support grassroots initiatives and community-led projects that promote environmental stewardship and resilience at the local level.

CONCLUSION

Summary of key findings

Environmental externalities are unintended consequences of economic activities that affect ecosystems, human health, and quality of life. They can be positive (beneficial) or negative (harmful), with examples including pollution, habitat destruction, and ecosystem services.

Environmental externalities lead to market failures, as the costs or benefits of actions are not fully accounted for in market transactions. Theoretical frameworks such as Pigouvian taxation and the Coase theorem offer insights into addressing externalities through taxes, subsidies, and property rights.

Negative externalities have significant consequences on ecosystems, public health, and economic well-being, resulting in social burdens and economic costs. Case studies illustrate the real-world effects of externalities, including air pollution, deforestation, and water contamination.

Political barriers, vested interests, and uncertainty in valuing environmental goods pose challenges to implementing effective policy measures. Distributional impacts and equity considerations require careful attention to ensure fairness and social justice in environmental policymaking.

Regulatory measures, including pollution taxes and emissions standards, play a crucial role in internalizing externalities and promoting sustainable practices. Market-based instruments, such as cap-and-trade systems and subsidies for green technologies, offer innovative solutions to incentivize environmental stewardship. International cooperation and agreements are essential for addressing global environmental challenges and fostering collective action.

Individuals, communities, businesses, and governments are called upon to raise awareness, adopt sustainable practices, advocate for policy change, and promote corporate responsibility.

 

Collaboration and proactive measures are emphasized as essential for addressing environmental externalities and building a more resilient and sustainable future.

Call to action for sustainable practices and policies.

Environmental externalities pose significant threats to ecosystems, public health, and economic prosperity. To safeguard our planet and ensure a sustainable future, urgent action is needed at all levels of society. Here’s a call to action outlining steps that individuals, communities, businesses, and governments can take to address environmental externalities.

  1. Raise Awareness: Educate yourself and others about environmental externalities, their impacts, and the importance of addressing Use social media, community events, and educational programs to raise awareness and mobilize support for environmental protection.
  2. Adopt Sustainable Practices: Reduce your carbon footprint by conserving energy, using public transportation, and embracing renewable energy sources. Practice sustainable consumption habits, such as reducing waste, recycling, and supporting eco-friendly products and businesses.
  • Advocate for Policy Change: Engage with policymakers and advocate for stronger environmental regulations, including emissions standards, pollution taxes, and conservation Join or support environmental organizations and initiatives that promote sustainable policies and advocate for the protection of natural resources.
  1. Promote Corporate Responsibility: Encourage businesses to adopt sustainable practices, reduce emissions, and invest in renewable energy technologies. Support companies that prioritize environmental stewardship and transparency in their operations.
  2. Invest in Innovation: Invest in research and development of clean technologies, renewable energy solutions, and sustainable agricultural Support innovation hubs, startups, and initiatives focused on addressing environmental challenges and promoting green entrepreneurship.
  3. Foster International Cooperation: Advocate for international agreements and partnerships to address global environmental issues, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and ocean conservation. Support efforts to aid and resources to developing countries for implementing sustainable development initiatives.
  • Hold Decision-Makers Accountable: Hold elected officials and policymakers accountable for their environmental commitments and ensure that environmental considerations are integrated into decision-making processes. Vote for candidates who prioritize environmental protection and advocate for policies that address environmental
  • Engage in Community Action: Participate in local environmental initiatives, such as tree planting, beach cleanups, and community gardens. Work with neighbors, community organizations, and local governments to address environmental challenges and promote sustainability at the grassroots level.

REFERENCES

Baumol and Oates (Reference Baumol and Oates1988).

“Environmental Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy” by Barry C. Field and Martha K. Field (Pearson, 2014)

Aunan K. (1996). “Exposure-Response Functions for Health Effects of Air Pollutants Based on Epidemiological Findings.” Risk Analysis 16(5): 693-709.

Richard B. Stewart. Controlling environmental risks through economic incentives.

https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ccrVAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA85&dq=Bri ef+overview+of+environmental+externalities&ots=up8iSpm6Ef&sig=cpWXlqbQXLy6WVF3g LvMZ_Jr6YA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Brief%20overview%20of%20environmental%20ext ernalities&f=false

Dascalu, C., Caraiani, C., Iuliana Lungu, C., Colceag, F. and Raluca Guse, G. (2010), “The externalities in social environmental accounting”, International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/18347641011023252

Ntangusa Moonyoi is a Bachelor of Commerce at Strathmore University Kenya. 

The post Environmental Externalities: Research Paper appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1511
REDD+ Justification and Criticism http://silvica.site/redd-justification-and-criticism/ Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:50:14 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1504 Insurmountable evidence show how man is destructive to the environment

The post REDD+ Justification and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

This article is in draft phase. Final version will be published on 7th February 2024

Globally, the agriculture, forestry and land use change is a major net emitter of greenhouse gases. It is estimated that the sector contributes 23% of GHG. As such, forest conservation and avoided deforestation are attractive alternatives for climate change mitigation. Against this background, the UNFCCC introduced REDD+ (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries). The Warsaw Framework provide the basic rules for REDD+ including safegurds for people and the environment, national forest monitoring systems, forest reference levels, MRVs, etc.

In theory, REDD+ is of benefit to both developed and developing countries as developed countries can reduce emissions at low cost by supporting REDD+ while developing countries receive financial incentives to reduce deforestation.

 

Critism of REDD+

Weakened rules

There is concerned that some of the requirements for environmental safeguards, benefit sharing process,a nd participatory approaches are not stringent enough.

Over issuance of credits

There are some reports of REDD+ projects overissuing carbon credits. An important aspect of REDD+ project is calculating the baseline which climate action can be measured.

However, most standards publicly list project information and have space for public comments. More importantly, baselines are reassessed during validation. Recently, Verra revised its baseline assessment period from 10 years to 6 years.

Furthermore, standard agencies often engage group of experts in developing standards and reviewing projects.

Concluding remarks

Scrutiny of carbon projects help to improve transparency and the effectiveness of offset projects.

Tropical forests are reducing. The fact is that projects similar to REDD+ do assist in reducing the rates of deforestation. A number of studies support this claim Malan et al (2024), Everland (2023) and Ropsind et al (2019)

 

 

More reading

https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13021-023-00228-y

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post REDD+ Justification and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1504
To Value or Not to Value Nature http://silvica.site/nature-valuation/ Sun, 31 Dec 2023 14:41:26 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1498 Insurmountable evidence show how man is destructive to the environment

The post To Value or Not to Value Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The idea of putting a price on nature is controversial.

The major argument is that nature has an intrinsic value and valuation turns the natural world into a subsidiary of the corporate economy. As such, the proponents of intrinsic value of nature argue that there is no need of putting a price on nature, as it has its own rights independent of human use.

Additionally, some argue that putting monetary value on biodiversity implies that it can be divisible into smaller parts. There is a danger of financialization of nature in large open markets. Many entrepreneurs are seeing potential profits in marketization of nature and are supporting for their development.

Pricing natural assets could also imply that they could be substitutable for other products elsewhere. Many natural assets are not fungible and could not be substituted for other assets. Unlike capital in finance, we cannot invest, borrow, or spend natural capital. The treatment of natural assets as capital could be catastrophic for nature.

Some aspects of the natural environment are harder to quantify than others. For instance, valuing cultural value is notoriously difficult. Supporting services are also hard to quantify. Conversely, for provisional services, simple market values can be determined.

The question remains, is it better to put an imperfect quantification on nature, or continue BAU that regard natural world as valueless?

This is a very tough debate, but my personal opinion is that since the globe is increasingly capitalistic, nature should be valued and integrated in the contemporary capitalist system.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post To Value or Not to Value Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1498
Some Statistics on How Man is Destroying Nature http://silvica.site/some-statistics-on-how-man-is-destroying-nature/ Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:46:52 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1474 Insurmountable evidence show how man is destructive to the environment

The post Some Statistics on How Man is Destroying Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The natural environment is fundamental to humans’ survival on Earth. It also contributes to our economy and culture. Unfortunately, our ways of life are destructive to the ecosystem.

It is easy to overlook nature and think that everything will always be there. However, multiple evidence shows that nature can be destroyed.

Humans destroy the environment in several ways including:

  • Over-extracting natural resources
  • Pollution of air, soils, and water
  • Destroying landscapes

The reasons for the destruction are pretty simple. Our overpopulation and overconsumption are leading to more urbanization, agriculture, and entertainment. 

Read an article highlighting the major global environmental issues, mainly caused by humans.

Collapse of Species

The bullet points below illustrate how biodiversity is shifting. Links in the bullet points redirect to articles across websites proving the statements.

  • Livestock accounts for 62% of global mammalian biomass while humans account for 34%. Only 4% of the biomass represents wildlife species. The estimate is a startling reminder of the reduced biodiversity.
  • Poultry accounts for 61% of the world’s birds’ biomass. Some estimates claim that poultry biomass could be as much as 80%. In contrast, 4-10% of bird species are farmed as poultry.
  • Over 12% of the known species are faced with the danger of extinction. Over 30% of land and 75% of freshwater resources are utilized for food production.
  • Lost over a third of tigers and elephant populations since counting began.
  • Further, these wild areas are concentrated in about 20 countries. The wilderness areas are often the homes of indigenous communities.
  • Wildlife populations have reduced by 68% since 1970. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the drop has been over 94%.
  • Over a million species are in danger of extinction
  • One of every 3 freshwater species is faced with extinction threat.
  • IUCN has listed 77 animals as extinct in the wild. The organization’s Red List identifies 41,000 species as threatened, which represents 28% of the total species researchers assess.
  • 3 million species in the Amazon are threatened by human-caused ecosystem collapse.
  • Introduced species have significant negative impacts on the environment. The number of alien species has increased as humans move across habitats. Alien species could have dramatic impacts on the species richness of native habitats.

Habitats destruction

Habitat destruction is a leading cause of species decline.

  • Only 25% of the terrestrial land is wilderness area. That is, areas not affected by human footprint. These areas are mainly in Canada, Russia, Brazil, and Australia. Similarly, only 33% of marine-based environments are truly wild. Even more concerning is a study that claims only 3% of the earth has ecological integrity and ‘intactness’).
  • 26% of the planet (ice-free land) is used for livestock, with 33% of cropland for livestock feeds. Animal agriculture is responsible for 17% of greenhouse gas emissions. Global meat consumption has more than doubled since 1990.
  • Land use change, especially for agriculture leads to biodiversity loss and land and water degradation. In 2021 alone, 9.3 million acres of tree land in the tropics were converted to other land uses.

Water Natural resources are not spared too

The cascading effect of Nature degradation

  • Nature degradation has a cascading effect on the environment. Some of these consequences are listed as:

    • Reduction of ecosystem stability: intact ecosystems are more resilient to pressures such as climate change
    • Reduction of ecosystem services: Nature degradation often also reduces the functionality of various ecosystem services such as pollination, water provision, soil formation, carbon sequestration, and climate regulation
    • Species extinction: The loss of one species has a cascading effect on other species as well.
    • Food security: Biodiversity is vital for food security as it provides genetic resources, pollination services, and natural pest control. The destruction of nature may reduce the agricultural productivity.
    • Human health as losing biodiversity may mean losing potential treatment of diseases. Moreover, decline of ecosystem services, such as water and air purification, may increase the exposure to pollutants and pathogens
    • Economy loss: nature supports various industries including tourism, fisheries, and agriculture. The destruction of natural resources has implications for the economic development of a region
    • Loss of cultural values, in particular, of indigenous people.
    • Reduced resilience to climate change
    • Natural disaster resistance: natural disasters such as floods, storms, and landslides are less severe in areas of healthy and diverse ecosystems.

What Can We Do?

The Sustainable Development Goals recommend the following changes to reverse or reduce human impacts on nature:

Conserve wetlands, which are important breeding grounds for 40% of the worlds’ species

  • Fight ocean acidification
  • Manage Foodwaste
  • Manage pollution
  • Protect forests
  • Protect key biodiversity areas
  • Enhance climate finance to help fight climate change

The Good News

Evidence shows that conservation efforts may cause the recovery of some species. For instance, the black tail reef shark in Australia and the Nepalese Tiger have shown remarkable recovery rates by conservation efforts.

Concluding remarks

Humans are depleting the natural resources at an alarming rate. At the current rate, we will need 2.5 earths by 2050 to satisfy the consumption rate. Some of the overexploited natural resources include sand, trees, soils, fossil fuels, and water. I perceive the capitalistic mindset to be the central cause of the degradation and destruction of the environment. The solutions have to be capitalistic too. We know that natural resources have value. It is time to assign value to the resources and ensure that ecosystem services are rightly priced. It shouldn’t end there as well. The money obtained from the PES should be appropriately invested in conservation and the communities undertaking conservation activities. I feel that the environment is at a tipping point. If we don’t rationally manage it, more disasters may await us. Whether it is the effects of climate change or the proliferation of killer diseases. I believe Covid-19 could have been an environmental disaster.

REFERENCE

Most of the references are in the links within the text. Other references include

Humans Destroying Ecosystems: How to measure our impacts on the environment (2023) https://sentientmedia.org/humans-destroying-ecosystems/extirpate

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 15 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on environmental projects, he writes for Silvica on various topics. This blog’s views are personal and do not represent the organizations he is associated with. 

The post Some Statistics on How Man is Destroying Nature appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1474
Natural Resources Definition, Features, and Classification http://silvica.site/natural-resources-definition-features-and-classification/ Mon, 25 Oct 2021 07:40:47 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1352 PES in conservation is emerging as a feasible tool

The post Natural Resources Definition, Features, and Classification appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Natural resources definition can be a simple or complex concept. The fact is that all products that we use are based on natural resources. For instance, plastic may be an obvious man-made product but it has its origins in natural resources including natural gas, oil, and plants. These natural resources are refined into ethane and propane to create different polymers.

 

A simple natural resources definition would define natural resources as ‘things that occur naturally and are of value to humans’. A more acceptable definition of natural resources comes from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that defines it as ‘assets occurring in nature that can be used for economic production or consumption.’

 

It is important for a resource to have value to humans.  Value means that human beings should be able to use the resources. 

 

But there is a problem with the definition. It would mean that since air is not used in economic production or consumption, it would not be a natural resource. Although the economic value of air is not obvious it is the basis of life on earth.

Technical natural resources definition

A more technical explanation defines natural resources by what they are not. It is common for environmentalists to define natural resources by what it is not. In this respect, a natural resource is not:

  • Goods subjected to some processing, e.g automobiles
  • Products not extracted from the natural environment. E.g., food from agriculture is cultivated rather than extracted.

Further, the technical definition would involve a look into the features/characteristics of natural resources. Five features are pertinent:

  • Exhaustibility
  • Uneven distribution in different countries: For instance over 80% of all known oil reserves are within 3 countries
  • Externalities such as pollution that arise from extraction
  • Volatility: variation in the pricing
  • Dominance: many countries rely on a narrow range of natural resources for their export

A more detailed explanation of the features of natural resources is explained in the World Trade Report

 

Natural resources are thought of as natural capital different from human and physical capital.

 

In natural resources definition, it is vital to distinguish between natural resources as factors of production and goods that can be traded. As factors of production, natural resources can form the basis for various economic sectors. For instance, unique natural scenery may spur tourism. In contrast, some natural resources such as minerals can be traded in the international market in their raw form.

 

The earth’s physical environment provides the life support system and all the resources we use. The physical environment has four spheres including the biosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere.

Classification of natural resources

Just like there are varied ways of defining natural resources, there are different ways to classify the resources including:

  • The origin categorizes resources into biotic and abiotic. Biotic resources would be obtained from living things while abiotic resources originate from non-organic materials.
  • Stage of development: This approach categorizes natural resources as potential, actual, reserve, and stock resources.
  • Renewability: is the most commonly used method of classification and is the focus of the subsequent discussion

 

The air we breathe and the light we get from the sun are available in unlimited quantity, at least in theory. In contrast, resources like coal, forest, and petroleum can be depleted. The stock of these resources is limited because they keep reducing day by day.

 

Based on renewability, resources can be classified into:

  1. Inexhaustible
  2. Exhaustible resources

Inexhaustible Resources

The resources which cannot be exhausted by human consumption and other uses are called inexhaustible resources or perpetual resources. Examples include energy sources like solar radiation, wind power, water power (flowing streams) and tidal power, and substances like sand, clay, air, water in oceans, etc.

They cannot be exhausted! For example, the sun will always be there even if everybody in the world puts up solar panels! The push for renewable energy, especially solar and the wind is based on the premise that these resources’ availability is unlimited.

 

Exhaustible Resources

On the other hand, there are some resources, which are available in limited quantities and are going to be exhausted (finished) as a result of continuous use. For instance, the stock of coal on the earth is limited and one day there will be no more coal available on earth. Petroleum is another important exhaustible resource. The exhaustible resources can be classified to:

  • Renewable
  • Non-renewable resources

Renewable Resources

Some of the exhaustible resources are naturally regenerated after consumption and are known as renewable resourcesE.g. living beings (both animals and plants) reproduce and can thus, replace the dying or killed individuals. It is important to note that if the use of these resources is a greater rate of regeneration, they may also get totally exhausted/ finished. Some examples of renewable resources are freshwater, fertile soils, forest (yielding wood and other products), vegetation, wildlife, etc.

 

Non-renewable Resources

The resources, which cannot be replaced after use, are known as non-renewable resources. These include minerals (copper, iron, etc.) fossil fuels (coal, oil, etc.).

 

Sometimes, unsustainable use of renewable resources may turn them into non-renewables. For instance, many conservationists categorize endangered wildlife species (rare plants and animals) as non-renewable.

Concluding Remarks

In essence, natural resources are found virtually everywhere on earth. However, scholars often include the concept of ‘value’ in defining natural resources. Resources exist independently of humans but can be defined as natural resources when they are of value to humans. Adjectives such as ‘critical’ or ‘keystone’ are increasingly being used to describe some natural resources or capital to show that some resources are more valuable than others.

 

All goods we use will either need natural resources (e.g foods that require minerals from soil) or will embody natural resources (e.g. a car will contain iron ore).  The problem is that with economic development and population growth, more and more natural resources are being extracted. This unsustainable resource use is the cause of some of the major environmental problems of today.

 

Read more about natural resources in this book

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The view in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Natural Resources Definition, Features, and Classification appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1352
An Overview of the Environment, Ecology and Nutrient Cycles http://silvica.site/an-overview-of-the-environment-ecology-and-nutrient-cycles/ Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:38:50 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1280 The basics of environmental education includes the definition of ecosystem, environment and ecology

The post An Overview of the Environment, Ecology and Nutrient Cycles appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Environmental education is a process of learning about the environment to work with it and not destroy it. It is the purpose of this blog post to introduce basic concepts of environmental education to the readers. The definitions of environment and ecology will help you understand the concept of the environment.

What is the Environment?

The environment is all the surrounding of an organism.

 

Better still; the environment can be defined as a combination of different systems. These systems include;

The physical environment e.g. atmosphere, water, and soil

The biological environment e.g. plants and animals

The social environment i.e. humans

 

An organism-environment has two parts which include

Non-living parts such as temperature. The non-living part is also called the abiotic component

The living part includes plants, animals, and microorganisms. The living part is also called the biotic component.

Definition of Ecology

Ecology as a science attempts to explain ‘how nature works’. The term was derived from two Greek words: Oikos meaning “house and Logos, meaning, “study of’. The coining of the term was done in 1869 by German biologist Ernst Haeckel.

As such, ecology is the study of living things in their home or environment: all the external conditions and factors, living and non-living that affect an organism. In the words of Miller (1991), ecology is the study of the interactions between organisms and their living (biotic) and non-living (abiotic) environment. Note that the keyword is interactions. It means that exchanges occur within the environment

Ecology was of practical interest early in human history.  In primitive societies, the people seem to understand their environment and work with the forces of plants and animals for their survival. Civilization tends to use tools, such as fire, to modify the natural environment. Technological advances have made some of us oblivious of the role of nature in the survival of mankind. Many of us forget our continuing dependence on the natural resources for air, water, and indirectly, food, recreation, waste disposal, etc.

Biosphere and the Ecosphere

The earth has several major parts that play a role in sustaining life. You are part of what ecologists call the “biosphere” – the living and dead organisms found near the earth surface in parts of the atmosphere (air), hydrosphere (water), and lithosphere (soil)

The biosphere is that part of the earth’s surface and its immediate atmosphere that is inhabited by living organisms. The biosphere fulfills three (3) primary functions for living things;

  1. a) It provides a place where living things complete their life cycle (a habitat)
  2. b) It provides a stable habitat within which the evolution of species can occur.
  3. c) Powered by solar energy, it forms a self-regenerating system that supports life.

The biosphere represents a complex series of interrelationships between the soil, rock, water, and air and the living organisms contained in it.

Energy Flow and Matters Recycling

Do you know wonder what keeps humans (you, me), and most other organisms alive on this planet? To answer this question, you need to understand the fundamental processes, which govern life on planet earth. It will interest you to know life (yours inclusive) on earth depends largely on two fundamental processes presented below:

  1. a) The one-way flow of energy from the sun which is the major source of energy for ecosystems. In short, the sun is either directly or indirectly a source of energy for all life on earth.
  2. b) The recycling of chemicals required by living organisms through parts of the ecosphere. Important cycles include carbon, phosphorous, nitrogen, water, and oxygen cycles.

A basic in environmental education; you will recall that the source of the energy, which sustains life on earth, is the sun. Solar energy lights and warms the earth and supplies the energy used by green plants to synthesize the compounds, which keep them alive and serve as food for almost all other organisms. Solar energy also controls the recycling of key chemicals and drives the climate and weather, which distribute heat and freshwater over the earth’s surface.

Cause and Effect in the environment and ecology

As you are probably aware from the laws of physics, every action causes a reaction. Everything that we do set off a chain of events that extend far beyond our control. Negative action will result in a negative reaction while positive action will result in a positive reaction. For instance, pollution, a negative, will fill the air with substances that harm people’s lungs, rise in the air to cause global warming, falls back as acid rain harming vegetation, and contributes to the depletion of the ozone layer. On the other hand, simple acts such as recycling can save trees from being cut down unnecessarily. Even small actions in the protection of the environment are significant. So, always look into doing positive things for the environment, they do count!

The difference between environment and ecology

Many people tend to confuse ecology with the environment. But they are different concepts. While the environment is concerned with surroundings, ecology attempts to explain how the environment works (that is, the interactions between and among the biotic and abiotic components).

Ecologies attempt to explain the interactions among the five levels of organization of matter (organisms, population, communities, ecosystem, and the biosphere)

The ecosystem is a subset of ecology that focuses on a particular environment. All ecosystems come together to form one gigantic ecosystem called the biosphere.

All in all, we note that ecology focuses on the relationships between organisms and the components of their environment.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The view in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post An Overview of the Environment, Ecology and Nutrient Cycles appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1280
The summary of Kenya’s Wildlife Conservation and Management Act http://silvica.site/the-environmental-issues-of-overpopulation-2/ Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:28:26 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1152 Nuclear energy is often left out of environmentally friendly energy source discussions. There are cases for and against nuclear energy. Be the judge

The post The summary of Kenya’s Wildlife Conservation and Management Act appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The act has 14 parts and 11 schedules

Part I: Preliminary

Part one of the act introduces the law and define some key terms including game ranching, game farming,

The Principles of the Act are cited to include devolution, effective public participation, ecosystem approach, recognition of wildlife conservation and management as a form of land use on public, community and private land, self-sustainability (benefits from wildlife offset costs), sustainable utilization and equitable benefit sharing.

Part II: Kenya Wildlife Service

Part 2 of the act deals with the establishment of Kenya Wildlife Service. Some of the functions for KWS include:

  • The conservation and management of national parks and sanctuaries in Kenya
  • Establishing wildlife conservation committees in each county
  • Developing the mechanisms of sharing benefits of wildlife conservation with communities
  • Advise in the preparation of management plans for conservancies

The act lists a total of 19 functions of KWS

The service is managed by a Board of Trustees that includes the

chairperson (appointed by the president),

Principle Secretaries of matters of wildlife, finance and devolution

Inspector general of police

Four people appointed by the Cabinet Secretary (one from NGO, two from community conservancies, and one from private conservancies)

Part III: Matters finance

The primary source of funding for KWS is the national government. Other sources include investments and joint partnerships. The Board or Trustees are mandated to prepare estimates of revenue or expenditure for each year.

Part IV: Wildlife Regulation Mechanism

It specifies that each county in Kenya should have a County Wildlife Conservation and Compensation Committee. Each of the committee will consist of:

  • a chairperson appointed by the Cabinet Secretary
  • a rep of the county government;
  • an agricultural officer
  • a land use planning officer
  • a livestock officer responsible
  • the officer of the Service for the county, who shall be the secretary;
  • four persons and nominated by the community wildlife associations
  • a medical officer
  • the officer in-charge (police)
  • the county environment officer

Among the functions of the CWCCC is the establishment of wildlife user rights. The committee also should ensure that benefits from wildlife resources are distributed.

The committee could also invite members who do not have the voting powers.

Under section VI, issues of bioprospecting are outlined. Bioprospecting refers to searching for plants and animal species where medicine and other valuable compounds can be extracted. A bioprospecting licence can only be issued by the service.

Part V: Wildlife Endowment Fund

KWS establishes an endowment fund that is vested in Board of Trustees. The endowment fund receives money from parliament, investments, grants, and payment for ecosystems services (PES) schemes.

The functions of the endowment fund include:

  • developing wildlife conservation initiative
  • managing and restoring protected areas
  • protecting threatened species and habitats
  • supporting wildlife security operations;
  • facilitating community-based wildlife initiatives

Under the section, the govern net of Kenya is supposed to establish a Wildlife Compensation Scheme. Funding sources for the scheme include the national government and other sources approved by the cabinet secretary.

The Wildlife Compensation Scheme covers human death or injury, or crop and property damage caused by livestock. The County Wildlife Conservation and Compensation Committee verifies the claims and submit recommendation to the cabinet secretary.

  • Death- KES 5,000,000
  • Injury causing permanent disability- KES 3,000,000
  • Other injuries- Maximum of KES 2,000,000
  • Damages to livestock and crops are paid at local market rates, as long as owner took reasonable measures to protect their livestock/crop

People unsatisfied with the award have 30 days to appeal to National Environment Tribunal and on a second appeal to the Environment and Land Court.

Part VI: Conservation Protection and Management

The section is consistent with the Environmental Management and Coordination Act and Water Act.

Sections 31 through to 38 define the procedures of declaring national parks, reserves, wetlands, marine conservation areas, and variation of boundaries.

Section 39 outlines the procedures of establishing community and private conservancies/sanctuaries. Any land with wildlife could establish a conservancy. Section 43 outlines the standards of management where the County Wildlife and Compensation Committees could submit recommendations to deregister conservancies.

Communities and individuals may establish community wildlife associations with blessings from County Wildlife Conservation and Compensation Committee. Associations work to facilitate conflict resolution and communal management of wildlife in a region.

Each national park, marine area, wildlife conservancy and sanctuary shall be managed according to a management plan. Developments shouldn’t be approved without the presence of a management plan.

Mining and quarrying in national parks is prohibited unless they are given consent by the state and the area does not contain endangered species, is not a critical wildlife habitat or an important water catchment.

A person may not carry out activity on a listed species (sixth Schedule) without the permit from the service.

Section 49 outlines how KWS can develop species recovery plans for listed species.

Part VII: Establishment of Wildlife Research and Training Institute

The act asserts that there should be a corporate institute called the Wildlife Research and Training Institute. The major purpose of the institute is to coordinate wildlife research in the country.

The institute is located in Naivasha and offers various diploma and certificate courses.

Any person undertaking research on wildlife in Kenya should obtain a permit from the institute. When a researcher is outside the country, they should have a sponsoring institution from the home country.

The institute is also tasked with developing an elaborative wildlife database according to the act. The database will use info from universities, research institutions and Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The data should be made available to stakeholders and the general public. Section 62 further mentions that someone will require to pay a prescribed fee to access the data.

Part VIII: Conservation Orders Easement and Incentives

 

Part IX

Part X

Part XI

Part XII

Part XIII

Part XIV

 

Schedules

Schedule 1

Schedule 2

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

Schedule

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views on this blog post are personal.

The post The summary of Kenya’s Wildlife Conservation and Management Act appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1152
The Environmental Issues of Overpopulation http://silvica.site/the-environmental-issues-of-overpopulation/ Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:11:18 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1105 Nuclear energy is often left out of environmentally friendly energy source discussions. There are cases for and against nuclear energy. Be the judge

The post The Environmental Issues of Overpopulation appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

In June 2020, the world population is at approximately 7.8 billion people. By 2050, there will be about 10 billion people on the planet. As populations grow, the natural environment feels the impact of the overconsumption. We have identified nine environmental issues of overpopulation.

1. Exhaustion of natural resources

With a surging population, natural resources such as fossil fuels, coral reefs, natural forests, and arable land diminish.  This consumption brings competition for life-sustaining resources, eventually resulting in a reduced quality of life. Overpopulation places a strain on the available natural resources. The increased human population now requires a third more infinite natural resource to supply it with its basic needs. Unfortunately, the planet can’t provide such an amount of resources.

2. Deforestation as an environmental issue of overpopulation

Forests are part of natural resources. As such, this is an extension of the first point.

A surging population means more food, more wood, more land, and more wood products. This demand leads to deforestation as humans clear natural forests to meet such needs. In turn, deforestation leads to increased carbon emissions, since there are no trees to trap the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.  Deforestation exasperates the greenhouse gas menace.  

For instance, South America’s tropical rainforests have been eradicated, thanks to overpopulation. These forests, which have historically been producing about 20% of the global oxygen can’t effectively trap carbon dioxide. The other adverse implications of deforestation are the extinctions and loss of species.  Agricultural activities are on the rise, thanks to overpopulation. These activities have caused 80% of world deforestation, as humans encroach natural forests to meet the increased demand for food.

3. Environmental degradation increases with more people

Overpopulation translates into the overuse of natural gas, oil, and coal.  This overuse produces severe environmental effects over time. Overpopulation has occasioned an increase in industries and the number of cars on the roads, ultimately affecting air quality. Overpopulation alone contributes significantly to rising carbon emissions, which results in global warming.  Changing climate patterns and melting of ice caps courtesy of overpopulation, are just a couple of adverse consequences which the earth has to confront today due to environmental degradation. 

Land degradation is also prevalent due to overpopulation. An increase in the global population means excessive use of pesticides and fertilizers and intensive farming. Such activities are to blame for land degradation, which is evident from salination, waterlogging, and soil erosion.  The impact of overpopulation on marine and terrestrial natural resources is palpable.  Coastal degradation is visible in areas where large human populations live near the coast. In such places, increased human activities lead to massive degradation of the available marine habitats.  Worse still, it leads to the loss of species that depend on marine habitats for their survival.

4. Global warming and climate change are also an environmental issue of overpopulation

Although population expansion doesn’t lead to global warming directly, global warming and overpopulation are closely related.  Global warming is attributed to surging greenhouse gasses. These gases are human-generated to no small extent. The larger the global population is, the higher the levels of greenhouse gasses will be emitted. The reliance on fossil fuels such as oil and coal due to population expansion has been cited as the primary contributor to global warming. As long as the global population continues to soar, global warming will remain a critical environmental concern. A recent environmental report cites global warming as the biggest threat to biodiversity and ecology.

5. Animal and plant extinction

The rising human populations worldwide leave the planet with few available resources. Both animal and plant species depend on these resources for their survival.  Global warming, which is an environmental implication attributed to population expansion, is responsible for mass fauna and flora extinctions.  There are predictions from scientists across the globe that, over half of the planet’s animal and plant species face possible extinction by 2050.  E.O Wilson, an American biologist, predicts that over 30,000 animal species are being exposed to possible extinction each year thanks to population expansion

6. Loss of ecosystems

Overpopulation is the crucial cause of the massive loss of ecosystems currently being experienced globally. Ecosystem loss is evident from the loss of coral reefs, rainforests, arctic ice, and wetlands. For instance, rainforests initially covered about 14% of the world’s land surface. Presently, they cover a meager 6%, and pundits predict that the remaining rainforests face possible extinction 40 years from now.  Surging the human population has led to the mass loss of reefs since 1980.  The United States has lost over half of its wetlands in less than a century because of population growth. Similarly, Europe ha lost over 70% of the wetlands due to rising human activities. Again, habit loss is singlehandedly responsible for wildlife extinction.

7. Loss of water resources

Water covers 75% of the world. The most significant percentage of water resources is in oceans, although there are 2.5 % global freshwater resources.  Over 70% of global freshwater is ice caps and glaciers. The other 30% is in rivers, ponds, groundwater, and lakes. Nevertheless, population expansion is solely to blame for the diminishing quantities of global freshwater.  Even the available freshwater resources are either too polluted or unreachable.  This leaves the world with just 1 % of freshwater.

The UN estimates that over half of the planet’s population will face water-based vulnerability by 2025. The human population has led to a massive loss of freshwater ecosystems. Furthermore, the species prevalent in freshwater ecosystems have diminished dramatically due to a rising human population that depends on these species primarily for food.  Simply put, the availability of freshwater globally has been jeopardized by rising human populations.

8. Rising urban population

Rising urban population is a menace that stems directly from overpopulation. Today, over 50% of the global population resides in urban areas. In 2050, an additional 2.5 billion people are estimated to live in the already overcrowded cities.  Increased urbanization poses adverse environmental effects. For instance, it leads to an increase in automobiles and industries, which negatively impacts the environment by growing toxic substances in the atmosphere and increasing carbon emissions. Sewage menace is also created by urbanization. The danger puts humans at high risk for cholera, dysentery, typhoid, and other ailments linked with poor sanitation. Furthermore, urbanization disrupts ecosystems as humans search for land for buildings, roads, and other infrastructure.  Huge volumes of waste in populated cities also lead to multiple health hazards.  

9. Eutrophication

Eutrophication refers to the accumulation of nutrients in large water bodies. The nutrients cause uncontrolled growth of plant materials in the oceans. As the plants prosper, lesser oxygen is left for other species leading to a decline in aquatic biodiversity.

The significant sources of eutrophication include agricultural wastes, industrial wastes, and sewerage. All the wastes arise because of population growth.

How can we mitigate the environmental issues of overpopulation?

The increasing numbers of humans are having an unprecedented effect on the environment. It is no wonder that some people are frantically looking for other inhabitable planets outside there. Regardless, we should think of how to address the environmental issue of overpopulation. Population control is such a thorny issue in many cultures. However, we should be brave enough to address the issue of overpopulation and the environment. The mitigating strategies can include educating people, use of birth controls, and reducing our consumption rates.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views on this blog post are personal.

The post The Environmental Issues of Overpopulation appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1105