conservation Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/category/conservation/ Greening our world through content Thu, 31 Oct 2024 05:37:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 https://i0.wp.com/silvica.site/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-silvica_image.jpg?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 conservation Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/category/conservation/ 32 32 162136420 The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) https://silvica.site/the-definition-and-concept-of-nature-based-solutions-nbs/ Wed, 09 Oct 2024 03:36:51 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1548 The definition of nature-based solutions (NbS) is problematic leading to confusion

The post The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

Nature-based Solutions may be a buzzword that is becoming ubiquitous in various spaces. However, do you know the NbS definition is quite vague? In this article, we will attempt to define the concept.

Various bodies have presented NbS definition. Some of the common definitions include:

  • Actions to protect, conserve, restore, sustainably use, and manage natural or modified terrestrial, freshwater, coastal, and marine ecosystems, which address social, economic, and environmental challenges effectively and adaptively, while simultaneously providing human well-being, ecosystem services and resilience and biodiversity benefits” (UNEA 2022).

PS: The UNEA definition is among the most commonly used definitions of NbS, but there are others as well, such as:

  • Strategies to address societal challenges through actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural and modified ecosystems, benefiting people and nature at the same time”(IUCN)
  • Solutions that are completely based on elements and direct inputs from nature, and are not managed by man or industrial elements
  • Actions inspired by, or supported by, or copied from nature to face social, environmental, and economic challenges.

Barbara and Joan proceed to list 20 definitions of NbS definition and concepts.

NbS definitions are blurry and general to clearly indicate which solutions could termed as NbS. In many cases, the blurry nature emanates from the observation that NbS involves the integration of various scientific fields, and where various experts view it through the lens of their respective disciplines.

NbS Definition Discussion

The concept of using nature to benefit people is not new, but the global interest in the concept has intensified over the years. Still, there is debate on what NbS are and the strategies for integrating them to address contemporary environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and land degradation.

Nature-based solutions use the natural functions of ecosystems to tackle some of the pressing environmental challenges. A key concept in NbS is protection, sustainable use, conservation, and restoration. As such, actions that minimize human impacts on nature such as waste reduction are not considered as NbS.

Despite an array of NbS definitions, a core principle in NbS is ‘working with nature rather than against it”.  Apart from inspiration by nature, other common features of NbS include addressing societal challenges, provision of multiple benefits, and economic efficiency.

It can also be helpful to define NbS by what it is not. Some of the exclusion criteria identified by Barbara and Joan (2020) include:

  • Lack of functioning ecosystems
  • Random actions that lack proper planning
  • Negative/no impacts on biodiversity
  • Copy-paste implementation

Similarly, the IUCN Global Standard for NbS includes 8 criteria that frame green/blue interventions as NbS actions. These criteria include

  1. Addressing societal challenges: The challenge must be identified as a priority for those who are or may be directly affected by the project
  2. Landscape/seascape level interventions: The design of NBS recognizes interactions between economy, society, and ecosystems
  3. Biodiversity gain: Design must proactively seek to enhance the functionality and connectivity of ecosystems
  4. Economic viability: if not addressed, NbS projects are at risk of being short-term
  5. Governance capacity: at minimal, NbS should align with prevailing legal and regulatory provisions.
  6. Equitable trade-off: Trade-offs cannot be avoided but they must be effectively and equitably managed.
  7. Adaptive management: Regular monitoring and evaluation to present an evidence-based foundation.
  8. Mainstream with jurisdictional context: Interventions designed to align with international, sectoral, national, and other policy frameworks

From the discussion, it is clear that any green/blue action is not necessarily an NbS. Regardless, Silvica has compiled some possible examples of NbS actions. Based on the definition in this article, examples of the NbS should aim at fitting the criteria specified.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1548
Payment for Ecosystem Services Definition, Examples, and Criticism https://silvica.site/payment-for-ecosystem-services-definition-examples-and-criticism/ Sat, 31 Jul 2021 19:17:55 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1317 PES in conservation is emerging as a feasible tool

The post Payment for Ecosystem Services Definition, Examples, and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The natural environment provides a series of benefits to people. According to WWF, the services provided by the ecosystem can be categorized as:

  • Support services- they provide conditions that allow the provision of other services. For instance, photosynthesis support primary production
  • Provision services- these include the goods and services that we directly get from the environment. For instance, food and fiber.
  • Regulation services- The capacity of ecosystems to regulate some processes such as air and water quality
  • Cultural services- Ecosystems are part of the culture and heritage of the people.

However, many of the ecosystem services are seen as market externalities because of their public good character and open-access nature. As such, Neoclassical economics rarely factor in the decision-making of economic actors. Environmental economists champion commodification and valuation to internalize the externalities. Payment for Ecosystem (or Environmental) Services is one of the tools that is commonly used to commodify environmental services.  

PES in Conservation as Tool (Definition)

Government regulation can help maintain some ecosystem services. But that is not always the case. Community members living around vital ecosystems often need the financial incentives to conserve.

In simple terms, PES refers to the various situations where users of an ecosystem service make payments to the providers/protectors of the service. In return, the payments guarantee the flow of these ecosystem services. As such, PES would support the conservation and expansion of ecosystems.

A widely used definition of PES is by Sven Wunder, in which he explains, “A payment for environmental services scheme is a voluntary transaction in which a well-defined environmental service (ES), or a form of land use likely to secure that service is bought by at least one ES buyer from a minimum of one ES provider if and only if the provider continues to supply that service“

Form definition, payments are made on condition of the evidence of provision of an ecosystem service.

The monies accrued from PES support the funding for natural resources management.

In theory, PES schemes could assist in reducing poverty and enhance the conservation of natural systems. They also assist in reducing conflicts between conservationists and landowners that could arise from competing land uses. In short, PES in conservation is gaining traction as a leading strategy.

Examples of PES

There are various types of PES in conservation projects but they could be categorized into four groups:

  • Carbon sequestration and storage- an organization emitting GHGs pays projects that have verified carbon credits.
  • Biodiversity conservation- for instance the establishment of conservancies where communities are paid to maintain land for biodiversity.
  • Watershed protection- downstream water users pay upstream communities for conserving water and ensuring the flow.
  • Landscape beauty- for instance, ecotourism where a tourism operator would pay the local community to maintain wildlife and habitats intact

In practice, many PES projects would offer a variety of services. For instance, a forest conserved for carbon credits may still promote biodiversity conservation, water quality, and landscape integrity.

Many of the active, and successful, PES are funded through the UN REDD+ projects. In Kenya, there have been a considerable number of successful PES projects under this framework.

Comparisons with Polluter Pay Principle

The polluter-pay principle postulates that practices that produce pollution should bear the brunt of managing the resulting environmental and human health impacts. PES is similar to the polluter-pays principle in the sense that it creates positive incentives for environmental conservation and protection.

PES in conservation favors ‘provider gets’ instead of the polluter pay principle. The decision to move towards PES has been influenced by the drawbacks of polluter pay principles. For instance, the direct influence of polluters and the absence of polluters in the areas most affected by pollution are some of the common shortcomings of PPP.

The Criticisms of PES

Granted, PES in conservation has proven as an effective tool especially in developing countries. It has assisted in correcting market failures by pricing conservation efforts. It has also improved the accessibility of cash in rural areas. Regardless, PES as a concept has some drawbacks including:

  • Economic valuation of environmental services is difficult and a costly process. The measurement and valuation of ecosystem services are difficult because of incomplete information and scientific uncertainties in ecosystem functioning.
  • It could lead to ‘commodity fetishism’ where some ecological functions (such as carbon sequestration) are valued over others (like biodiversity conservation).
  • Leakage (or substitution effect, or slippage) can occur where the provision of economic services in one area leads to the increased pressure for conversion in another area.
  • Some PES schemes are vulnerable to corruption.
  • Failure to effectively monitor the schemes
  • Perhaps, the most common criticism of PES emerges from the school of thought that nature value is impossible to quantify. They argue that nature should be conserved for nature’s sake and not monetary returns. The argument is that if the payment stop, then people would stop conserving the environment.
  • REDD+ is an example of PES that has been criticized for its neo-colonialism. The criticism claims that rich countries have exploited their natural capital and are paying poor countries a small fee for their environmental sins.

Concluding remarks

Despite the various criticisms of PES, Silvica finds that the programs are vital for the conservation of the environment. Communities offering ecological services should be rightfully paid for the services they offer. From my experience, the following pointers are vital for an effective PES project:

  • Programs initiated and funded by users tend to be more successful as compared to those run by donors.
  • Blind replication is not advised. A PES project working in one area may not work in another area. There is a need to design projects to the local contexts
  • A clear, and fair, distribution of income is vital for the success of a PES project.
  • Managers of PES projects should work to ensure that they get the best price for their environmental services. Landowners need to view conservation as the most viable land-use option.

Honestly, I also question the sustainability of PES schemes especially in the event where the payments stop for some reason or the other. Additionally, I don’t think by themselves (at least for now) PES can effectively promote the conservation of natural resources. The big question is ‘what are the alternatives?’ I find that telling people to conserve for the sake of conservation is selfish. Why should communities languishing in poverty conserve forests instead of practicing agriculture? It is fairer if they are paid for their conservation efforts. Going forward, PES in conservation should work with other tools to further promote effective environmental management.  

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The view in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Payment for Ecosystem Services Definition, Examples, and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1317
A Summary of the Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016) https://silvica.site/kenya-forest-conservation-and-management-act/ Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:47:22 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1204 The Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016) is a product of the review of the Forest Act (2015) to align it to the constitution

The post A Summary of the Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

The Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016) is a product of the review of the Forest Act (2015) to align it to the constitution of Kenya. One of the key changes of the Act is the inclusion of county governments in forest management and conservation. Other conspicuous provisions in the act include:

  • A forest status report and resource assessment report to be prepared every 2 and 5 years respectively by KFS. A GIS database should also be maintained regularly by KFS
  • Any person may petition the variation of forest boundaries
  • A public forest strategy formulated every five years
  • Allows for more involvement of communities and private sectors in forestry

The act has 11 parts and 2 schedules. The table below is a summary of the 11 parts of the Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act.

Parts

Key Points

1.       Preliminary

Captures general things about the act such as citation and commencement, interpretation, applications, guiding principles, public forest policy, and public forest strategy

2.       Administration

Kenya Forest Service (KFS) is the body responsible for the management of public forests in Kenya. Some of the key responsibilities of KFS include the implementation of forest management plans, issuing licences, and permits for use of forest resources, establishing benefit-sharing arrangements, and build the capacity of the County government in forestry.

The roles of other institutions such as Kenya Forest Research Institute (KEFRI) and Kenya Forestry College are also outlined.

County governments are required to implement national forest policies and manage public forests in counties

It also outlines the appointment of honorary foresters and the establishment of forest conservation areas and committees

3.       Financial provisions

It addresses the source of funds for KFS, which is mainly from the national treasury

It also defines Forest Conservation and Management

Trust Fund that seeks to support forestry programmes such as payment for ecosystem services

The board prepares the budget at least two months before the end of the financial year (June)

4.       Classification and management of forests

Forests are classified as s public, community, or private. But community and private forests are registered by KFS

Community forests upon registration can benefit from Forest Conservation and Management Trust Fund and get technical support from county governments

The service can declare a mismanaged community or private forest as a provisional forest

Each county to have an arboretum or a green zone

5% of any housing development project should be a green zone

With counsel from KEFRI, the cabinet secretary can declare a tree species to be protected

No individual can fell, cut, damage, or remove, trade

in or export or attempt to export any protected tree species

with backing from an EIA, the service can offer a concession to utilize public forests

Any person/service or institution can enter into a management agreement for all or parts of a public forest. But no management agreement includes settlements in the forest

5.       Community participation

Outlines the obligations of the community forest association.

The association sets out the use of forest resources, methods of biodiversity conservation, methods for biodiversity monitoring, and protection of wildlife.

The CFAs are entitled to forest user rights such as collection of forest products, ecotourism and education activities.

6.       Incentives for increasing forest and tree cover

Investors in forests shall share the benefits of their investment with

local communities e.g. employment, infrastructure, education

Tax and fiscal incentives (by Government)  to promote forest conservation and management

Promote national tree planting week and the International Day of Forests (21st March)

7.       Licencing and Trade in forest products

The KFS can allow the private sector to participate in sustainable forestry management through licenses, contracts, joint management agreements, or concessions

The Service shall publish in the Gazette a chain-of-custody system for the verification of the origin of forest products from the public, community, and private forests

8.       Enforcement and compliance

Chief conservator of forests and forest officers can demand licence and search any person suspected to have possession of forest products.

Seizing and detaining livestock found roaming illegally in the forest.

Officers of the service above the rank of Sergeant Forest Ranger have the same powers conferred on a police officer under the Criminal Procedure Code and the National Police Service Act, 2011#

Officers with paramilitary training can use firearms

9.       Offences and Penalties

Except under licence/permit, the following are illegal activities in a public/provisional forest: illegal harvesting of forest products, importation or exportation of forest produce, illegally marking forest produce, arson of a forest and introduction of exotic genetic material, smoking, livestock grazing, cultivating, and possession of logging equipment.

Other offences related to counterfeiting and quarrying are defined.

The penalties for each group of offences are also outlined.

Any dispute that may arise in respect of forest conservation and management shall be referred to the lowest possible

structure under the devolved system of government initially but may be forwarded to National Environment Tribunal for determination if unresolved. An appeal, where applicable, lie in the Environment and Land Court as established under the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011.

10.    Miscellaneous

Gives provisions for the regulations of the act

The act aligns with the constitution and international treaties where Kenya is a signatory

11.   Transitional provisions

The Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016) repeals the Kenya Forest Act (2005) and Timber Act (1972). However, public forests and licences issued before the act are valid.

Schedules of the Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act

The Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act has 3 schedules as follows:

  • The first schedule indicates the tenure of office and conduct of the business of the board
  • The second schedule outlines the conditions for public participation, and
  • The third schedule lists the gazetted public forests in Kenya

Issues with the Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act

Although the Act aligns forestry regulations in Kenya with the constitution and international treaties, various shortcomings are evident:

  • The Chief Conservator of Forests is determined as the person in charge of day to day running of KFS (Section 14(4)). However other instances mention the director-general (Section (35(2b).
  • Although the act claims that public forests are managed by KFS, it also contradicts itself by claiming that county governments should manage the public forests under their jurisdiction. The clash with devolution is also evident in the classification of county forests (yet the act initially mention forests could only be public, private, or community). However, there is a feeling that the KFS mandate is public forests, while the counties have a mandate over the community and private forests. This feel is captured by the fact that the Chief Conservator of Forests supervises the implementation of management plans in public forests. In contrast, county governments supervise the implementation of management plans in community and private forests (Section 47,6).
  • Although fines and penalties for illegal forest activity have been increased in the act. The penalties are still low for some offences. For instance, the maximum fine for tree poaching is 100,000 Kenya Shillings.

All in all, the Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act provides a good start point for Kenya in developing sustainable and productive forests. It would be great if some of Kenya’s forests could be regarded as important forests of the world.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.  

The post A Summary of the Kenya Forest Conservation and Management Act (2016) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1204
Vegetation Monitoring Methods https://silvica.site/vegetation-monitoring-methods/ Sat, 31 Oct 2020 17:46:10 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1177 The feeding and breeding habits of African elephants mean that they require massive spaces, something that is drastically decreasing in Africa’s wilderness areas.

The post Vegetation Monitoring Methods appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

veg monitoring 

Wild Fires in Africa

Reasons for sampling vegetation

In general, sampling is done because it is expensive if not impossible, to assess every plant in a given area. Specifically, sampling vegetation has various reasons including:

  • Assessing the effects of vegetation to management
  • Estimating the carrying capacity for a given area
  • Determining the habitats for various species
  • Long term monitoring of vegetation trends

Before starting a vegetation monitoring exercise, it is vital to understand the purpose of sampling. You see, different objectives may require different sampling methods.

Aspects/Attributes of vegetation that can be sampled

Species composition

Species composition (or botanical composition) refers to the contribution of a species to the total vegetation composition. It is usually expressed as a percentage. It is a common attribute in vegetation monitoring as it can be useful indicator of ecological and management processes.

Frequency

It is one of the easiest and fastest attributes for vegetation monitoring. It refers to the number of times a species is present in a given sampling unit. In other words, Frequency seeks to determine the ‘commonness’ of a species. It describes the distribution of plants Frequency attribute may be useful in providing early warning of undesirable change in indicator species. However, the attribute is dependent on quadrat size that it is not ideal to calculate composition from frequency data.

Cover

Generally, ground cover refers to percentage of ground covered by vegetation. Cover can be used to describe vegetation, canopy, foliar, base and ground cover.

Density  

In earlier publications, density was synonymous to cover. However, it is used to determine the number of individuals per unit area.

Absolute density

All species

Relative density

Specific species and often expressed as percentage

Production

Arguably, production is the best attribute to describe the roles of a plant species in an ecosystem. The terms associated with biomass are usually related to production. 

The attribute of production could also answers the question of ‘how much’. It involves the measurement of size, bulk and weight.

Weight/biomass is the best indicator of dominance. However, obtaining estimates could be time consuming.

Other measures of dominance include

  • Basal cover
  • Canopy cover
  • Ground cover

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views on this blog post are personal.

The post Vegetation Monitoring Methods appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1177
Rangeland Fires in Africa, are they necessary for savanna management today? https://silvica.site/rangeland-fires-in-africa-are-they-necessary-for-savanna-management-today/ Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:28:11 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1160 The feeding and breeding habits of African elephants mean that they require massive spaces, something that is drastically decreasing in Africa’s wilderness areas.

The post Rangeland Fires in Africa, are they necessary for savanna management today? appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

30 Sept 2020

Rangeland fires are ubiquitous in the African savannas, especially in the dry season. Livestock owners and range managers would start fires to promote the growth of good grass. In some cases, the fire could start from lightning or accidents. Regardless, the fires have been part of the African savannas for generations. For a long time, the fires have been considered as essential for the integrity of the savanna system. The question is whether the fires are a necessary management practice in the face of climate change and other environmental problems of the 21st century.

Wild Fires in Africa

Ecological importance of the Rangeland fires in Africa

Many people believe that wildfires are vital for the survival of the savannas. They argue that the fires do little to destroy the biological community, hence they do not threaten biodivesity.  The major benefits of the forest fires to the ecology are cited as:

  • Fires provide a feast for animals. Species like birds come to devour grasses, mice, lizards, or even snakes killed or driven out by the fires.
  • Some animals and plants rely on the fires for their survival. For instance, some trees will require fire to break seed dormancy. Also, some birds, e.g. Temminck Courser, only nests in recently burned grasslands.
  • Underground holes and crevices provide a hiding place for small creatures. Larger animals can usually run from the fire
  • The fire would burn dry stem and leaves of grasses and some trees. However, the roots remain unharmed and would sprout when moisture is available. This sprouting nature of the grasses is the main reason why pastoralists set grasslands on fire in the dry season. Wildlife also benefit from the emerging nutritious grass
  • The burnt shrubs can also survive on starch reserves until favorable conditions come up.
  • Fires are also set up to control the emergence of thorny bush and the widespread of ticks and other parasites to livestock

Professionals assert that well-controlled fires are an effective tool to manipulate vegetation composition, structure, and fuel loads on rangelands (and other wildland ecosystems).

Because of the aforementioned reasons, fire is often encouraged in the management of rangelands across Africa. Moreover, many managers believe that frequent burning of rangelands is good because it is a way of preventing big catastrophic fires. After all, ignoring the burning of grass leads to a build-up of fuel.

All that glitters is not gold

The use of fire as a management tool requires it to be applied at the correct frequency, intensity, and scale. We think that most wildfires today are not effective in management. Rangeland fires may have worked to shape African savannas in the past, but is it still a viable management tool? Here are a few points why we think that wildfires shouldn’t be encouraged

The effects of rangeland fires on soils

Soils are among the most vital of natural resources. After all, they support most of the terrestrial wildlife habitats and the agricultural systems that humans depend on for food. However, there is a consensus that burning often harms soil minerals. A conference paper claims that burned areas have between 1071 and 1420 grams per meter square less carbon compared to unburned areas. Moreover, burned soils have lesser nitrogen but higher calcium. In the advent of climate change, managers should rethink the effect of burning rangelands as a management practice because of its impacts on soil organic carbon.

Fire caused damages to properties

Uncontrolled fires in rangelands can result in losses in property. These could include things like cars, houses, or even livestock. Rangelands in Africa are also the locations for lodges and hotels.

Potential impacts of rangeland fires on biodiversity

Given that some plants and animals benefit from wildfire, other species are adversely affected by it. For instance, the fires could kill small animals like rodents and reptiles. Not to mention, fires could also kill and prevent the growth of young tree seedlings. Although many trees in African rangelands are resistant to fire, young seedlings may not withstand the heat. Moreover, grassland fires could sometime encroach into woodlands or forested areas.

The carbon equation

Its obvious, burning grass does emit carbon into the atmosphere. However, it can be argued that the grass could have dried and rotted anyways, still emitting the carbon. Some scientists argue that the fires in the savannas are almost always carbon neutral. This argument emerges from the observation that grass burnt usually regrows after one year and absorbs the equivalent of carbon emitted. Without a doubt, the fires have a negative impact on soil carbon stock and the regeneration of woody plant matter, which could store more carbon.

Fires have been an important management tool in the African rangelands. However, challenges such as habitat fragmentation, overgrazing, biodiversity loss, and climate change should make managers reconsider the effectiveness of fires. Personally, I think in the big picture fires are more detrimental than useful in the African rangelands.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views on this blog post are personal.

The post Rangeland Fires in Africa, are they necessary for savanna management today? appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1160
Conservation of biodiversity for human health is vital, otherwise pandemics like Covid-19 will be the new normal https://silvica.site/conservation-of-biodiversity-for-human-health-is-vital-otherwise-pandemics-like-covid-19-will-be-the-new-normal/ Sun, 31 May 2020 13:56:27 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1045 In pursuit of development Human activities has let to the destruction of biodiversity. It is emerging that conservation of biodiversity for human health is vital.

The post Conservation of biodiversity for human health is vital, otherwise pandemics like Covid-19 will be the new normal appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Why should we strive to conserve biodiversity? I believe that If we do not, pathogens will find space to live among us. And when they do, our public health might be in danger. Hear me out.

No one knows the exact origins of coronavirus (Covid-19). Regardless, many people believe that it originated from Wuhan China, mainly because the first cases had linkages with a wet market in the area. Regardless, scientists know that the SARS-CoV-2 is common in bat populations. The virus somehow managed to infect humans. Like AIDS, SARS, Ebola, and some other infectious epidemics, the coronavirus is a zoonotic disease.

Think about it; the human body has trillions of microorganisms. How many more microorganisms exist within other plants and animals? I do not know, but I guess that it is undoubtedly more than quadrillions, or the next ‘llion’! And some of those microorganisms are pathogens, meaning that they cause diseases.

As we get closer to biodiversity, we expose ourselves to the pathogens

Human activities like urbanization, agriculture, logging, mining, and population growth trigger the destruction of biodiversity.

It is the destruction of biodiversity that creates conditions for new diseases. Tropical forests and wildlands have various plants and animals, and these living things harbor a variety of viruses. As we tamper with biodiversity, we get closer to more and more microbes.

Humans disrupt the ecosystem by killing animals and destroying habitats. When that happens, the viruses (and other microbes) that used to live in the animals and habitats will require new hosts. Often, the new hosts are us.

To reiterate, killing all the biodiversity will not get rid of the microbes. Inevitably, a few microbes may go extinct, but a significant number will look for alternative hosts. Humans will make a right candidate for alternative hosts because we are spread all over the earth.

The hidden cost of human economic development is exposure to zoonotic diseases. Rarely do environmental impact assessments capture this enormous cost. If you want to argue about the costs of zoonotic diseases, refer to how coronavirus has put the world at a halt.

Conserving biodiversity for human health is pertinent.

Researchers believe that pathogens are crossing from animals to humans at an alarming rate. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 75% of new emerging diseases are zoonotic. The coronavirus is just a tip of the iceberg, and more dangerous infectious diseases may arise if we do not put our act together.

We believe that conserving biodiversity will have positive outcomes for human health. As such, governments and non-governmental organizations should ensure enough land is set for protected areas. Species and their associated microbes will thrive in protected areas

I am not saying that maintaining protected areas will automatically mean that we will have no new zoonotic diseases. But yes, the risks will reduce. We should accept that humans are part of the earth system. In the bigger scheme of things, our ecological function is as crucial as the persistent mosquito.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views on this blog post are personal. 

The post Conservation of biodiversity for human health is vital, otherwise pandemics like Covid-19 will be the new normal appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1045
15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development https://silvica.site/nature-based-solutions-examples/ Thu, 21 May 2020 18:17:14 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=958 We have developed 15 examples of nature-based solutions that we think could help in reducing pressures in the environment

The post 15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

The concept of nature-based solutions (NBS) could be confusing and abstract. After all, from fossil fuels to plastics, humans have always relied on nature for development. Regardless, the European Union defines NBS as ‘actions which are inspired by, supported by or copied from nature.’ A more detailed article on NbS definition is also published in Silvica. An advantage of nature-based solutions is that they are ready to be deployed. We have outlined nature-based solutions examples in this post.

1.      Tree Growing

Growing trees is a solution to a myriad of contemporary challenges. Chief among them is mitigating the effects of climate change. Trees are plants, so they absorb carbon dioxide through the process of photosynthesis. Planting billions of trees around the world is one of the most practical ways of absorbing excessive amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Scientists estimate that 1.7 billion hectares of current treeless lands have a potential for tree growth.  As a nature-based solution example, tree planting also assists in improving biodiversity, soil, air, and water quality.

2.      Renewable energy

The types of renewable energy that could be useful NBS include solar, wind, hydroelectricity, and biofuels power. The advantages of renewable energy are aplenty. For starters, renewable energy produces lesser emissions compared to fossil fuels. Additionally, renewable energy sources are flexible in the sense that they can be powered using local resources. The continuous maturation of the renewable energy sector means that the costs of renewables will keep decreasing with time.

3.      Beekeeping

As a nature-based solution example, beekeeping does tick most of the boxes. When evaluated against the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), beekeeping can help achieve SDGs one, two, three, five, eight, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, and fifteen. The sad news is that bees are disappearing, yet they are vital components of our ecosystem. For instance, they are significant pollinators of flowering plants.

Have you ever watched the Silence of the Bees documentary? 

4.      Ecotourism

Is it possible for your travel to benefit the local community and the environment at the same time? Yes, it is! When you practice ecotourism, communities and conservation benefit. The International Ecotourism Society defines it as ‘responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the wellbeing of the local people, and involves interpretation and education.’ The problem is that there is a lot of greenwashing in ecotourism. Operators would offer mass tourism but market it as ecotourism. As a traveler, ensure that you do your research well.

Watch a video about Ecotourism 

5.      Payment for Ecosystem Services

Environmental services can be categorized into ecological goods, regulating services, supporting services, and cultural services. Presently, environmental benefits are undervalued or lack value in the financial realm. A central principle in PES is for the environmental services’ beneficiaries to ‘pay’ for the conservation of the same resources. Under PES schemes, farmers and landowners receive payments after implementing previously agreed actions that provide ecological services.

6.      Carbon financing (REDD+ projects)

Carbon financing is an example of PES. It is inevitable for companies to emit carbon into the atmosphere. Regardless, responsible emitters have the option of buying carbon credits from the voluntary markets in carbon financing. For instance, companies could purchase credits from verified REDD+ (reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) projects.

Deforestation is responsible for 15% of global greenhouse emissions; thus, stopping deforestation has a significant impact on the carbon equation. Remember, about 80% of above-ground terrestrial carbon stocks and 40% of soil carbon are in forest ecosystems.

7.      Protected areas

Protected areas are the backbone of biodiversity conservation. National parks, conservancies, reserves, ranches, and community conservation areas are among the most common types of protected areas. The coronavirus pandemic supports the idea of respecting and protecting biodiversity. We have the obligation of setting aside significant wilderness areas where biodiversity could thrive. If not, we may interact with dangerous pathogens as the biodiversity will attempt to survive amongst us.

8.      Avoid plastic products as such as possible.

Plastic is a bad boy of global pollution. As such, we should focus on choosing alternatives to plastic when possible or avoiding plastic altogether. Some plausible environment-friendly options include glass, stainless steel, natural fiber cloth, wood, and paper. It is difficult to completely do away with plastic because it lurks in a variety of products, including chewing gums, metal containers, food packaging, diapers, personal care products, cigarette filters, glue, and medical equipment.

9.      Restoring whale population

Surprisingly, whales conservation has an enormous impact on climate change. One whale absorbs up to 33,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide. In comparison, a tree absorbs up to 22 kgs of carbon a year. Moreover, phytoplanktons follow whales. More whales imply more phytoplankton, and phytoplanktons absorb as much as 40% of all carbon dioxide. 

10. Agroforestry

As the name suggests, agroforestry is a combination of agriculture and forestry. In other words, it involves the integration of trees and crops/livestock in the same land. There are plenty of reasons why a farmer would choose to add trees to his/her farming system. Chief among them is soil conservation and additional products from the trees. As one of the nature-based solutions examples, agroforestry is implementable in existing farming systems.

11. Green roofs

Green roofs refer to vegetation cover grown on rooftops. They are also called rooftop gardens or living roofs. The natural-based solution example is particularly relevant to urban dwellers. Green roofs help reduce energy costs as they insulate buildings. Moreover, they assist in reducing the runoff from storms or snows. A typical metropolitan area produces more than five times more runoff compared to a rural area. Green roofs make urban areas ‘less typical’.

12. Urban gardens and green spaces

Like green roofs, urban gardens and green spaces are nature-based solutions for towns and cities. Home gardens have the benefit of improving the food security of an area. According to the World Health Organization, urban green spaces reduce environmental hazards, improve the quality of life of the urban regions, and improve residents’ wellbeing.

13. Organic farming

Conventional agriculture has various adverse effects on the environment. For instance, the use of inorganic fertilizers harms groundwater and biodiversity. In contrast, organic farming reduces some of the negative impacts of modern agriculture as it involves growing crops with reduced or no fertilizer and other synthetic inputs. Consequently, organic farming is compatible with biodiversity conservation.

14. Green infrastructure

The United States Environmental Protection Agency defines green infrastructure as ‘the range of measures that use plant or soil systems, permeable pavement or other permeable surfaces or substrates, stormwater harvest and reuse, or landscaping to store, infiltrate, or evapotranspirate stormwater and reduce flows to sewer systems or to surface waters.’ As such, measures such as green roofs and tree growing in urban areas fall under green infrastructure. Many forward-looking cities are implementing green infrastructure.

15. Green Economy

The end game for the nature-based solution is the transition to a green economy. The focus of a green economy is sustainable consumption and production, social inclusion, resource efficiency, and reduced emissions.

Watch this video to understand Green Economy better. 

Nature-based solutions present practical ways to deal with current environmental problems. However, NBS should complement other actions, not replace them. Policies re important in ensuring that we implement NBS. Regardless, the personal initiative could also enhance the implementation of a green economy. Ask yourself, ‘what natural-based solution examples can I implement to promote sustainable development?’   

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post 15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
958
Important Forests in The World https://silvica.site/important-forests-in-the-world/ Mon, 18 May 2020 18:40:53 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=903 Forests play a vital role in maintaining a sound environment, thanks to the fact that they contain the most extensive animal and plant diversity. Better

The post Important Forests in The World appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

Forests play a vital role in maintaining a sound environment, thanks to the fact that they contain the most extensive animal and plant diversity. Better still, forests have billions of trees that are particularly essential for absorbing carbon dioxide, thus helping to address the contemporary challenge of climate change.

Forests cover about 30% of the landmass on earth. However, most of the forest sites face various challenges that threaten their very existence. As such, we should all support the conservation of the world’s forest. We have outlined some of the important forests in the world.

The Expansive Amazon Rainforest

About 10% of the global biodiversity is in the Amazon (Source, WWF)

The massive rainforest lies on a territory stretching across nine nations.  It is the world’s largest rainforest since it represents over half of the rainforests in the world. Approximately 70% of the rainforest covers the Brazilian territory, although there is a significant part of the forest in Peru. Initially, the forest spread on a total area of approximately 7 million sq. Km (2.7 million sq mile).

Nonetheless, the forest is today estimated to cover an area of about 5.5 million sq. Km (2.12 sq. miles), thanks to heavy logging that has diminished the forest cover in the previous decades.  The Amazon Rainforest is considered critical since it hosts valuable freshwater resources alongside a wealth of diversity. Moreover, the rainforest plays a vital role in global biodiversity. Still, the forest is a carbon sink and hence offers essential ecological services.

The biodiversity of Congo Forest

As the world’s 2nd most extensive tropical forest, the Congo Forest forms a quarter of the earth’s remaining tropical forests. It covers an estimated area of 1.9 million sq. Kms (734,000 sq. miles). The Congo Forest is essential for a myriad of reasons. First, it houses 10,000 plant species, hundreds of mammals, and over 1,000 bird species. Secondly, the vast tropical forest is home to the world’s largest ape species, namely the Bonobo, gorilla, and chimpanzee. Besides playing a vital role in global diversity, the forest is home to over 24 million people who live within the forest area. Most of these people depend entirely on it for their livelihood.

The Coniferous East-Siberian Taiga

Located in East-Siberia, this vast coniferous forest stretches across a land area of about 4 million km sq. The forest is remarkably essential owing to its diversity of flora and fauna. The forest isn’t just the largest forest reserve in Europe, but also the 5th largest forest reserve worldwide. Furthermore, it hosts thousands of plant and animal species, most of which can only be seen here (endemic). It is also the only forest that stretches between tundra in the North and a group of temperate forests in the south.

The Scandinavian & Russian Taiga, a multipurpose forest complex

The forest is ranked as Europe’s largest eco-region, covering approximately 2 million sq. Kilometers (772,000 sq. miles). It spreads across Norway, Sweden, western Russia, and Finland.  The forest covers roughly a third of the European continent. It is crucial as a global ecological spot, thanks to the fact that it absorbs massive carbon dioxide emissions. The forest is specifically vital because it offers an extraordinary nesting habitat for thousands of bird species. It is also a haven for mining, tourism, and fossil fuel exploration.

The Sinharaja Forest, a World Heritage Site

The Sinharaja forest is the largest in Sri Lanka, with an area of 88 Km2 (34 miles2). It is also the country’s only remaining tropical rainforest. The forest is a significant part of Sri Lanka and the universe at large. Marjory because of its extraordinary biodiversity as it houses several species of endangered wildlife. It contains over half of Sri Lanka’s endemic mammals and butterflies. In 1988, UNESCO listed it as a World Heritage site thanks to its valuable, rich ecosystems and diverse living heritage. The forest boasts over 154 bird species that have been known to coexist in feeding flocks.

The Picturesque Mindo-Nambillo Forest

The sprawling, beautiful tropical forest is situated in Ecuador. It is one of Latin America’s most important ecological sites. Moreover, it is an incredible tourist attraction that keeps millions of travelers coming to Ecuador. The present-day tropical forest is a remarkably beautiful private reserve, which houses countless plants, birds, and mammal species. It is a treasure to behold, courtesy of the more than 450 bird species that live in the forest. It further houses a wide array of orchids.

The Avatar-inspiring Daintree Forest

Daintree forest is the world’s oldest rainforest, and it forms an integral part of the Australian treasure. The rainforest is a remarkable conservation center for birds, plants, and other mammals. For example, it houses the largest concentration of saltwater crocodiles in the universe.  It has the highest number of threatened animals and plant species.  The 1200 Km2 (463 square miles) rainforest was used as an inspiration for ‘Avatar’- one of the world’s best-selling movies.

The Pristine Xishuangbanna Rainforest

Located in China, this beautiful tropical rainforest is one of Asia’s biggest and most important forests. It is the world’s only living museum of flora and fauna. The 2500 Km2 (967 square miles) forest is also a center for ecosystem research for the Chinese government.  It has the most significant number of endangered plants and animal species in Asia. The forest is further home to multiple primitive villages that allows humans to coexist with wildlife.

Sundarbans, a Vital Mangrove Forest in Asia

The mangrove rainforest is located along with the coastal parts of the mighty Bay of Bengal. Due to its unmatched biodiversity, the forest has become highly significant as a conservation area. It has the widest variety of mangroves than any mangrove rainforest in the world.  The forest is a crucial natural wildlife spot. It has vast numbers of water monitor lizards and Bengal tigers, not to mention a variety of endangered species living in the mangrove rainforest.

The Endemic Valdivian Rainforest

Located in South America, the 250,000 Km2 (95,800 square miles) temperate rainforest is South America’s only rainforest. It houses the Andean Mountains, which add plenty of biodiversity to it. The forest is one of the world’s most important forests since it houses several fascinating creatures like the Kodkod and the southern Pudu.  Its vegetation comprises a variety of rare trees, such as the endangered Monkey Puzzle Tree. Approximately half of the woody species in the forest are endemic to the region 

The growth and harvest of palm oils is a major threat to many rainforests (Image by blackend464 from Pixabay)

Forests remain crucial systems that support our lives. On the surface, forests appear similar as they encompass a group of trees. However, each forest has its unique composition of plants, animals, and microorganisms. Some important forests in the world are facing threats ranging from human encroachment to deforestation. Others like Borneo and New Guinea forests face a challenge from palm oil production. We must act to conserve the important forests of the world.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.  

The post Important Forests in The World appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
903
The potential impacts of Coronavirus on Conservation in Africa https://silvica.site/the-potential-impact-of-coronavirus-on-conservation-in-africa/ Fri, 01 May 2020 10:25:45 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=783 In the long-run, coronavirus impacts on conservation is negative. As tourism income decreases, the threat to conservation in Africa is expected to increase

The post The potential impacts of Coronavirus on Conservation in Africa appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul
May 1, 2020

In the last two months or so, the world of conservation has seen a remarkable transformation in the natural environment following a slow-down of human activities. From the ban of wet markets to cleaner air to free wildlife movements. Consequently, some conservationists have hailed the environmental benefits of the virus. However, we should not be rejoicing yet. The virus may have more significant negative impacts on conservation, especially in Africa. Here are 5 reasons why we think that is the case.

  1. Reduced tourism numbers mean reduced conservation finances

The conservation model in most of Africa relies heavily on hunting and photo-tourism. As travel restrictions and lockdowns are the norms in tackling the virus, there is virtually no tourism in Africa. Consequently, conservation organizations will lack the funds for hiring park rangers, managers, and researchers. In short, the protection in conservation areas is reducing. Meaning there is an opportunity for illegal wildlife trade-which will outdo decades of work by conservationists in Africa.

The tragedy is tourism numbers are unlikely to increase soon, even if the pandemic ends. Coronavirus has severely hit the traditional source markets for African tourism. As of the end of May 2020, In the United States, over 1 million people had the virus.  Similarly, Europe also had about a million cases. Globally, at least 235,000 people had died. Without a doubt, A big chunk of people in the source markets have lost their income and will need to rebuild after the pandemic. Furthermore, we suspect that people will have some phobia in traveling, at least in the short run.

  1. No jobs mean an increase in poaching incidences

Globally, the virus has led to massive job losses across industries. However, developed countries have an array of safety nets for their citizens during the pandemic. For instance, the UK’s government’s furlough scheme guarantees that people unable to work will receive 80% of their income. The same privilege does not exist in Africa. The safety nets for most people in rural Africa is the land and ocean. As a result, people are reverting to bushmeat poaching and overfishing to supplement their food needs. After all, policing is more difficult because conservation organizations are downsizing, while the number of potential poachers is increasing. Rangers and tour guides are likely to poach because they know the wildlife behavior and the policing approach used by conservation organizations.

  1. The virus could make a jump into wildlife

The Coronavirus might have emerged from nature. There is a worry that it may cross over to other wildlife species. Humans and apes share over 95% of DNA. Even mild pathogens in humans can be devastating to apes. The danger of transmitting the virus to apes is a threat to conservation. It is no wonder that some national parks, such as Virunga in the Democratic Republic of Congo, have opted to lockdown.

The danger of infections is not limited to apes. The National Geographic also reports that seven big cats in a New York zoo tested positive for the virus. Potentially, the virus is a threat to the wildlife of Africa, including primates and felids.

Many conservationists favor the precautionary approach in dealing with the virus, especially when dealing with endangered species. The results could be catastrophic if the virus finds its way into Africa’s wildlife.

There is a possibility that coronavirus could be transmitted from humans to wildlife
An olive baboon with a young one. Africa has a huge diversity of wildlife that could be threatened by Covid-19. Image by Mark Jordahl from Pixabay

4.      Delayed actions for nature

The year 2020 was initially perceived as a super year for the conservation of nature. In the months of May through to October, governments were to meet under the UN Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD). A major output of the meeting would have been individual country targets in conserving biodiversity. The CBD announced the cancellation of the conference on 17th March 2020. Such conferences are vital for conservation in Africa as countries identify conservation priorities and pledge support.

Recent evidence show that disease outbreaks are caused by climate change, habitat fragmentation, and biodiversity loss. The last two causes vindicate the importance of CBD conference.

Meetings cannot be held because they do not follow the social distancing principle. Similarly, it means that research and training in conservation has reduced. Although online platforms create opportunities for communication, some aspects of conservation communication are hard to achieve using the online means. Moreover, the infrastructure for effective online communication is lacking in many of Africa’s conservation areas.

5.      Increase in human-wildlife conflicts

Understandably, more people will look at alternatively economic activities following the pandemic. In Africa, the go-to alternative often involves natural resources. The safety net for most people is agriculture-whether crop production or livestock rearing. Such activities mean going into wildlife habitats.

Conflicts arise when wildlife kill livestock or raid crops. Conservation organizations near wildlife areas have some form for consolation to losses suffered by farmers. The problem is these conservation organizations are likely to lack the funds to compensate livestock killed or crops raided. Afterall, as we mentioned in the first point, most conservation efforts rely on ecotourism.

What should be done to save the situation?

Without a doubt, conservation in Africa needs support now more than ever. Species are in real risk of decimation if the situation is left uncontrolled. If anything, the protection of conservation areas should be intensified during the Coronavirus crises. As the virus disrupts the livelihood of people, they are likely to resort to exploiting the environment. The big question is the source of funding for conservation. For now, we think that the best solution is philanthropy and grants. People and funding organizations with the muscle should support the precarious conservation industry in Africa.

The problem is there is a lot of competition for funding. It will be tragic for Africa if governments and funders fail to address conservation needs.

However, the future of African conservation shouldn’t be philanthropy. As conserved areas provide a myriad of environmental goods and services, policies should favour models based on payment for ecosystem services (PES). For instance, carbon stored in the conserved areas of Africa need quantification and verification. Consequently, the credits could be sold in the voluntary markets. In the same way, policies should seek to monetize the environmental benefits of soil, air and water quality that arises because of conservation.

Parting shot

The novel coronavirus has slowed down human activities. As a result, it appears that the environment is breathing as wildlife is roaming freely and air is cleaner in most parts of the world. But we are in a marathon not a sprint. Coronavirus is likely to have negative impacts on the environment in the long-term. In Africa, particularly, the virus has reduced tourism income, which is a main source for funding conservation. When this pandemic is over, Africa should relook its conservation model as the current one is unsustainable.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on my active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The views on this blog post are personal

The post The potential impacts of Coronavirus on Conservation in Africa appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
783