Climate Change Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/category/climate-change/ Greening our world through content Thu, 31 Oct 2024 05:37:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 https://i0.wp.com/silvica.site/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-silvica_image.jpg?fit=32%2C32 Climate Change Archives - Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development http://silvica.site/category/climate-change/ 32 32 162136420 The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) http://silvica.site/the-definition-and-concept-of-nature-based-solutions-nbs/ Wed, 09 Oct 2024 03:36:51 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1548 The definition of nature-based solutions (NbS) is problematic leading to confusion

The post The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

Nature-based Solutions may be a buzzword that is becoming ubiquitous in various spaces. However, do you know the NbS definition is quite vague? In this article, we will attempt to define the concept.

Various bodies have presented NbS definition. Some of the common definitions include:

  • Actions to protect, conserve, restore, sustainably use, and manage natural or modified terrestrial, freshwater, coastal, and marine ecosystems, which address social, economic, and environmental challenges effectively and adaptively, while simultaneously providing human well-being, ecosystem services and resilience and biodiversity benefits” (UNEA 2022).

PS: The UNEA definition is among the most commonly used definitions of NbS, but there are others as well, such as:

  • Strategies to address societal challenges through actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural and modified ecosystems, benefiting people and nature at the same time”(IUCN)
  • Solutions that are completely based on elements and direct inputs from nature, and are not managed by man or industrial elements
  • Actions inspired by, or supported by, or copied from nature to face social, environmental, and economic challenges.

Barbara and Joan proceed to list 20 definitions of NbS definition and concepts.

NbS definitions are blurry and general to clearly indicate which solutions could termed as NbS. In many cases, the blurry nature emanates from the observation that NbS involves the integration of various scientific fields, and where various experts view it through the lens of their respective disciplines.

NbS Definition Discussion

The concept of using nature to benefit people is not new, but the global interest in the concept has intensified over the years. Still, there is debate on what NbS are and the strategies for integrating them to address contemporary environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and land degradation.

Nature-based solutions use the natural functions of ecosystems to tackle some of the pressing environmental challenges. A key concept in NbS is protection, sustainable use, conservation, and restoration. As such, actions that minimize human impacts on nature such as waste reduction are not considered as NbS.

Despite an array of NbS definitions, a core principle in NbS is ‘working with nature rather than against it”.  Apart from inspiration by nature, other common features of NbS include addressing societal challenges, provision of multiple benefits, and economic efficiency.

It can also be helpful to define NbS by what it is not. Some of the exclusion criteria identified by Barbara and Joan (2020) include:

  • Lack of functioning ecosystems
  • Random actions that lack proper planning
  • Negative/no impacts on biodiversity
  • Copy-paste implementation

Similarly, the IUCN Global Standard for NbS includes 8 criteria that frame green/blue interventions as NbS actions. These criteria include

  1. Addressing societal challenges: The challenge must be identified as a priority for those who are or may be directly affected by the project
  2. Landscape/seascape level interventions: The design of NBS recognizes interactions between economy, society, and ecosystems
  3. Biodiversity gain: Design must proactively seek to enhance the functionality and connectivity of ecosystems
  4. Economic viability: if not addressed, NbS projects are at risk of being short-term
  5. Governance capacity: at minimal, NbS should align with prevailing legal and regulatory provisions.
  6. Equitable trade-off: Trade-offs cannot be avoided but they must be effectively and equitably managed.
  7. Adaptive management: Regular monitoring and evaluation to present an evidence-based foundation.
  8. Mainstream with jurisdictional context: Interventions designed to align with international, sectoral, national, and other policy frameworks

From the discussion, it is clear that any green/blue action is not necessarily an NbS. Regardless, Silvica has compiled some possible examples of NbS actions. Based on the definition in this article, examples of the NbS should aim at fitting the criteria specified.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post The Definition and Concept of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1548
Concepts of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and SOM http://silvica.site/concepts-of-soil-organic-carbon-soc-and-som/ Fri, 09 Aug 2024 04:03:15 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1539 Soil organic carbon and soil organic matter are interellated concepts that could be key in carbon markets going forward

The post Concepts of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and SOM appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
By David Okul

SOC is a measurable part of soil organic matter (SOM). SOM is notoriously difficult to measure and makes up 2-10% of soil. It contributes to carbon sequestration, soil structure, moisture retention, and biological functions of soils.

SOM is divided into living and dead components and varies from recent to century-old inputs. Its matter includes dissolved organic matter, particulate organic matter, humus, and resistance organic matter.

Estimating SOM from SOC

A conversion factor of 1.724 (to SOC) provides a reasonable estimate of soil organic matter for most purposes. The assumption is based on the observation that organic matter is 58% carbon.

However, Douglas Prybil (2010) refutes the claim. He claims that the factor is too low for most soils as the median conversion factor is 1.9 from their study. Their study concluded that a factor of 2 would be more practical as the values range from 1.4 to 2.5.

In summary, the factor of 1.724 is based on early studies and needs urgent inspection or revision.

SOC Sequestration

SOC sequestration refers to the process where carbon dioxide is transferred from the atmosphere into the soil as organic carbon. The process starts with photosynthesis where atmospheric carbon dioxide is transferred to organic compounds. The compounds are subsequently incorporated into the soil via plant residues and root exudates. Apart from that, other sources of SOC include:

  • Byproducts of animal and microbial activity
  • Organic compounds incorporated through dead plants and leaves with the assistance of subterranean organisms.

SOC sequestration is fronted as one of the ways in which climate change could be mitigated. It is argued that small increases of SOC in very large areas of agricultural and pastoral lands would significantly reduce atmospheric Carbon dioxide.

Various strategies could help optimize SOC sequestration potential including:

  • Conservation tillage: it involves minimal soil disturbance
  • Crop rotation: it helps to vary plant residues
  • Cover cropping: These are often plowed under the ground to add more carbon
  • Organic amendments: For instance compost and manure that increase organic matter in the soil

The potential of SOC sequestration is influenced by other factors such as

  • Rainfall
  • Soil erosion
  • Temperature
  • Sediment deposition

For the reduction to be permanent, the organic matter would be in a stable or resistant faction. Scientists estimate that grasslands have the potential to sequester 6.5 billion metric tonnes per year and close to 1.85 billion metric tonnes of carbon per year for croplands.

Measuring SOC is not a simple task as sampling needs to be systematic to represent the entire field. As SOC is dynamic, measurements are often associated with some degree of uncertainty.

The restoration of grassland ecosystems is explored as a means of accelerating SOC sequestration as soils store climatically significant amounts of SOC. Future research needs to focus on factors that influence sequestration rates, the development of accurate monitoring techniques, and the establishment of policies conducive to sequestration.

Concluding Remarks

The science of SOC sequestration is rapidly evolving and is incorporating the use of AI and satellite imagery. Given the expanse of grassland and agricultural land, we think that SOC sequestration offers a feasible solution for SOC sequestration. Monitoring SOC could greatly enhance carbon markets as both avoidance and reduction carbon projects could be developed from soil-related conservation activities.

Additional reading

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-08636-wQuantification of Soil Organic Carbon – Comparison of Wet Oxidation and Dry Combustion Methods

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-021-00333-1A protocol for measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification of soil organic carbon in agricultural landscapes

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years of experience in donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post Concepts of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and SOM appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1539
Carbon Trading as a Strategy to Fight Climate Change http://silvica.site/carbon-trading-markets-in-kenya-2/ Tue, 31 Aug 2021 18:19:54 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1324 Carbon trading Markets in Kenya are gaining recognition

The post Carbon Trading as a Strategy to Fight Climate Change appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

By definition, a carbon sink refers to anything that absorbs more carbon in the atmosphere than it emits. Conversely, a carbon source is anything that releases more carbon than it absorbs.

Examples of carbon sinks:

Forests

Soils

Oceans

More to follow

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The view in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Carbon Trading as a Strategy to Fight Climate Change appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1324
Payment for Ecosystem Services Definition, Examples, and Criticism http://silvica.site/payment-for-ecosystem-services-definition-examples-and-criticism/ Sat, 31 Jul 2021 19:17:55 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1317 PES in conservation is emerging as a feasible tool

The post Payment for Ecosystem Services Definition, Examples, and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The natural environment provides a series of benefits to people. According to WWF, the services provided by the ecosystem can be categorized as:

  • Support services- they provide conditions that allow the provision of other services. For instance, photosynthesis support primary production
  • Provision services- these include the goods and services that we directly get from the environment. For instance, food and fiber.
  • Regulation services- The capacity of ecosystems to regulate some processes such as air and water quality
  • Cultural services- Ecosystems are part of the culture and heritage of the people.

However, many of the ecosystem services are seen as market externalities because of their public good character and open-access nature. As such, Neoclassical economics rarely factor in the decision-making of economic actors. Environmental economists champion commodification and valuation to internalize the externalities. Payment for Ecosystem (or Environmental) Services is one of the tools that is commonly used to commodify environmental services.  

PES in Conservation as Tool (Definition)

Government regulation can help maintain some ecosystem services. But that is not always the case. Community members living around vital ecosystems often need the financial incentives to conserve.

In simple terms, PES refers to the various situations where users of an ecosystem service make payments to the providers/protectors of the service. In return, the payments guarantee the flow of these ecosystem services. As such, PES would support the conservation and expansion of ecosystems.

A widely used definition of PES is by Sven Wunder, in which he explains, “A payment for environmental services scheme is a voluntary transaction in which a well-defined environmental service (ES), or a form of land use likely to secure that service is bought by at least one ES buyer from a minimum of one ES provider if and only if the provider continues to supply that service“

Form definition, payments are made on condition of the evidence of provision of an ecosystem service.

The monies accrued from PES support the funding for natural resources management.

In theory, PES schemes could assist in reducing poverty and enhance the conservation of natural systems. They also assist in reducing conflicts between conservationists and landowners that could arise from competing land uses. In short, PES in conservation is gaining traction as a leading strategy.

Examples of PES

There are various types of PES in conservation projects but they could be categorized into four groups:

  • Carbon sequestration and storage- an organization emitting GHGs pays projects that have verified carbon credits.
  • Biodiversity conservation- for instance the establishment of conservancies where communities are paid to maintain land for biodiversity.
  • Watershed protection- downstream water users pay upstream communities for conserving water and ensuring the flow.
  • Landscape beauty- for instance, ecotourism where a tourism operator would pay the local community to maintain wildlife and habitats intact

In practice, many PES projects would offer a variety of services. For instance, a forest conserved for carbon credits may still promote biodiversity conservation, water quality, and landscape integrity.

Many of the active, and successful, PES are funded through the UN REDD+ projects. In Kenya, there have been a considerable number of successful PES projects under this framework.

Comparisons with Polluter Pay Principle

The polluter-pay principle postulates that practices that produce pollution should bear the brunt of managing the resulting environmental and human health impacts. PES is similar to the polluter-pays principle in the sense that it creates positive incentives for environmental conservation and protection.

PES in conservation favors ‘provider gets’ instead of the polluter pay principle. The decision to move towards PES has been influenced by the drawbacks of polluter pay principles. For instance, the direct influence of polluters and the absence of polluters in the areas most affected by pollution are some of the common shortcomings of PPP.

The Criticisms of PES

Granted, PES in conservation has proven as an effective tool especially in developing countries. It has assisted in correcting market failures by pricing conservation efforts. It has also improved the accessibility of cash in rural areas. Regardless, PES as a concept has some drawbacks including:

  • Economic valuation of environmental services is difficult and a costly process. The measurement and valuation of ecosystem services are difficult because of incomplete information and scientific uncertainties in ecosystem functioning.
  • It could lead to ‘commodity fetishism’ where some ecological functions (such as carbon sequestration) are valued over others (like biodiversity conservation).
  • Leakage (or substitution effect, or slippage) can occur where the provision of economic services in one area leads to the increased pressure for conversion in another area.
  • Some PES schemes are vulnerable to corruption.
  • Failure to effectively monitor the schemes
  • Perhaps, the most common criticism of PES emerges from the school of thought that nature value is impossible to quantify. They argue that nature should be conserved for nature’s sake and not monetary returns. The argument is that if the payment stop, then people would stop conserving the environment.
  • REDD+ is an example of PES that has been criticized for its neo-colonialism. The criticism claims that rich countries have exploited their natural capital and are paying poor countries a small fee for their environmental sins.

Concluding remarks

Despite the various criticisms of PES, Silvica finds that the programs are vital for the conservation of the environment. Communities offering ecological services should be rightfully paid for the services they offer. From my experience, the following pointers are vital for an effective PES project:

  • Programs initiated and funded by users tend to be more successful as compared to those run by donors.
  • Blind replication is not advised. A PES project working in one area may not work in another area. There is a need to design projects to the local contexts
  • A clear, and fair, distribution of income is vital for the success of a PES project.
  • Managers of PES projects should work to ensure that they get the best price for their environmental services. Landowners need to view conservation as the most viable land-use option.

Honestly, I also question the sustainability of PES schemes especially in the event where the payments stop for some reason or the other. Additionally, I don’t think by themselves (at least for now) PES can effectively promote the conservation of natural resources. The big question is ‘what are the alternatives?’ I find that telling people to conserve for the sake of conservation is selfish. Why should communities languishing in poverty conserve forests instead of practicing agriculture? It is fairer if they are paid for their conservation efforts. Going forward, PES in conservation should work with other tools to further promote effective environmental management.  

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The view in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Payment for Ecosystem Services Definition, Examples, and Criticism appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1317
The Atmosphere, Greenhouse Gas, Global Warming and Climate Change http://silvica.site/the-atmosphere-greenhouse-gas-global-warming-and-climate-change/ Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:05:39 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1312 Carbon trading Markets in Kenya are gaining recognition

The post The Atmosphere, Greenhouse Gas, Global Warming and Climate Change appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
By David Okul

We think that a basic understanding of the atmosphere is instrumental in explaining climate change.

Without our atmosphere, there would be no life on earth. Two gases make up the bulk of the earth’s atmosphere: nitrogen (78%), and oxygen (21%). Argon, carbon dioxide and various other trace gases make up the remainder.

Scientists divided the atmosphere into four layers according to temperature: troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, and thermosphere. The temperature drops as we go up through the troposphere, but it rises as we move through the next layer, the stratosphere. The further away from earth, the thinner the atmosphere gets. The figure below shows the different layers

 

TROPOSPHERE
This is the layer of the atmosphere closest to the Earth’s surface, extending up to about 10-15 km above the Earth’s surface. It contains 75% of the atmosphere’s mass. Temperature and pressure drops as you go higher up the troposphere.

The Tropopause: At the very top of the troposphere is the tropopause where the temperature reaches a (stable) minimum. Some scientists call the tropopause a “thermal layer” or “cold trap” because this is a point where rising water vapour cannot go higher because it changes into ice and is trapped. If there is no cold trap, Earth would loose all its water!

Most of what we call weather occurs in the troposphere. The uneven heating of the regions of the troposphere by the Sun causes convection currents and winds. Warm air from Earth’s surface rises and cold air above it rushes in to replace it. When warm air reaches the tropopause, it cannot go higher as the air above it (in the stratosphere) is warmer and lighter … preventing much air convection beyond the tropopause. The tropopause acts like an invisible barrier and is the reason why most clouds form and weather phenomena occur within the troposphere.

The Greenhouse Effect: Heat from the Sun warms the Earth’s surface but most of it is radiated and sent back into space. Water vapour and carbon dioxide in the troposphere trap some of this heat, preventing it from escaping thus keep the Earth warm. This trapping of heat is called the “greenhouse effect”.

However, if there is too much carbon dioxide in the troposphere then it will trap too much heat. Scientists are afraid that the increasing amounts of carbon dioxide would raise the Earth’s surface temperature, bringing significant changes to worldwide weather patterns … shifting in climatic zones and the melting of the polar ice caps, which could raise the level of the world’s oceans. We will discuss more of the greenhouse effect, for now know that it occurs in the troposphere.

 

STRATOSPHERE
This layer lies directly above the troposphere and is about 35 km deep. It extends from about 15 to 50 km above the earths surface.

The stratosphere is warmer at the top than the bottom. The lower portion has a nearly constant temperature with height but in the upper portion the temperature increases with altitude because of absorption of sunlight by ozone. This temperature increase with altitude is the opposite of the situation in the troposphere.

The Ozone Layer: The stratosphere contains a thin layer of ozone molecules (with three oxygen atoms) which forms a protective layer shielding life on Earth from the Sun’s harmful ultraviolet radiation. But this ozone layer is being depleted, and is getting thinner over Europe, Asia, North American and Antarctica. “Holes” are appearing in the ozone layer.

While green house effect occurs in the troposphere, ozone layer depletion occurs in the stratosphere.

 

MESOSPHERE
Directly above the stratosphere, extending from 50 to 80 km above the Earth’s surface, the mesosphere is a cold layer where the temperature generally decreases with increasing altitude. Here in the mesosphere, the atmosphere is very rarefied nevertheless thick enough to slow down meteors hurtling into the atmosphere, where they burn up, leaving fiery trails in the night sky.

THERMOSPHERE
The thermosphere extends from 80 km above the Earth’s surface to outer space. The temperature is hot and may be as high as thousands of degrees as the few molecules that are present in the thermosphere receive extraordinary large amounts of energy from the Sun. However, the thermosphere would actually feel very cold to us because of the probability that these few molecules will hit our skin and transfer enough energy to cause appreciable heat is extremely low.

Green House Effect

There are two common meanings of the term “greenhouse effect”: There is a “natural” greenhouse effect that keeps the Earth’s climate warm and habitable. There is also the “man-made” greenhouse effect, which is the increase of Earth’s natural greenhouse effect by the addition of greenhouse gases from the burning of fossil fuels (mainly petroleum, coal, and natural gas). Carbon dioxide amount in the stratosphere has increased. Compared to a pre-industrial atmospheric concentration of around 270 parts per million (ppm), the average concentration has increased to close to 400 ppm in 2012. This causes the man-made portion of the greenhouse effect.

You can think of greenhouse gases as sort of a “blanket” for infrared radiation — they keep the Earth’s surface and lower layers of the atmosphere warmer, and the upper layers colder, than if the greenhouse gases were not there.  About 80-90% of the Earth’s natural greenhouse effect is due to water vapor and clouds. Most of the rest is due to carbon dioxide, methane, and a few other minor gases. While the remaining gases in the atmosphere (e.g. nitrogen, oxygen) also absorb and emit a small amount of infrared radiation, their radiative effect on temperature is so weak that they can be neglected. While methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, there is far less of it in the atmosphere.  It is the carbon dioxide concentration that is increasing, due to the burning of fossil fuels (as well as from clearing rainforest), and it is believed by many scientists to be responsible for the global warming of the last 50 years or more.

Also, the concentration of methane, although extremely small (measured in parts per billion), has also increased in recent decades contributing somewhat to the strengthening of the greenhouse effect. The reasons for this increase, though, remain uncertain.

Global warming

Global warming is the process where the earth’s temperatures are actually getting warmer because of human activities that increase greenhouse gases.  The greenhouses gases (GHG) include carbon dioxide (the major one) and methane. Other minor green house gases are nitrous oxide and water vapor. The gases make the temperature of the earth to become warmer. Carbon dioxide occurs from burning fossil fuels e.g. from vehicles and industries. Fossil fuels include petrol products, diesel etc.

Scientists believe that greater amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and hotter temperatures on Earth, will significantly change the climate across the whole planet. This climate change is already beginning to happen in parts of the world. If you live in a very cold place like Alaska or Greenland, you might think a bit of global warming sounds like a great idea. But climate change doesn’t necessarily mean things will get hotter. Some places will be hotter some of the time, but most places will simply see more erratic and extreme weather. That could mean heavier rainfall on occasions, more snow in some places, longer periods of drought, more storms and hurricanes, and more frequent heat waves. All these can be disastrous!!!

Reducing global warming

  1. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

Do your part to reduce waste by choosing reusable products instead of disposables. Buying products with minimal packaging (including the economy size when that makes sense for you) will help to reduce waste. And whenever you can, recycle paperplastic, newspaper, glass and aluminum cans

  1. Plant trees

If you have the means to plant a tree, start digging. During photosynthesis, trees and other plants absorb carbon dioxide and give off oxygen. They are an integral part of the natural atmospheric exchange cycle here on Earth, but there are too few of them to fully counter the increases in carbon dioxide caused by vehicles, manufacturing and other human activities. A single tree will absorb approximately one ton of carbon dioxide during its lifetime.

  1. Encourage Others to Conserve

Share information about recycling and energy conservation with your friends, neighbors and co-workers, and take opportunities to encourage public officials to establish programs and policies that are good for the environment.

Remember anything that reduces the amount of carbon dioxide will reduce global warming and the greenhouse effect.

The post The Atmosphere, Greenhouse Gas, Global Warming and Climate Change appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1312
Carbon Trading Markets in Kenya http://silvica.site/carbon-trading-markets-in-kenya/ Mon, 31 May 2021 18:49:23 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1303 Carbon trading Markets in Kenya are gaining recognition

The post Carbon Trading Markets in Kenya appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Human-induced climate change is a major environmental problem in the modern world. The emergence of the Kyoto Protocol and its mechanism of carbon trading is thought to be a viable solution in addressing climate change. Kenya is among the African countries that are keen to explore the opportunities with carbon trade.  

As a developing country, Kenya isn’t required to curb its emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. However, it is eligible to sell carbon credits through the mechanisms identified by the protocol under Article 17. Similarly, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (that replaced the Kyoto Protocol) recognizes carbon trading as a tool in fighting climate change.

Policy Backing of Carbon Trade in Kenya

Developing countries face legal hurdles in attempts to implement international treaties, such as the Kyoto Protocol. In Kenya, the policy backing for carbon trading can be categorized into international laws and national laws as outlined below:

  1. International laws
  • Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
  • The Paris Agreement: Though controversial, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement outlines the rules for carbon markets and other international cooperation.
  1. National Laws
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010- Article 2(6) outlines the international treaties Kenya is a signatory to. Further, article 42 articulates that Kenyans have a right to a clean environment.
  • Energy Act 2019: indicates the desire to promote the development of clean energy and CDM
  • EMCA: Has no specific mention of carbon trading, but it promotes sustainable development in Kenya.
  • Climate Change Act 2016: the act establishes National Climate Change Council and Climate Change Fund
  • Forestry Conservation and Management Act: Although it doesn’t mention climate change, it recognizes the roles of forests in carbon sequestration
  • National Policy on Carbon Investments and Emissions Trading (2012) by the Ministry of Finance

Carbon trading projects in Kenya

Carbon projects can fall under either the compliance or the voluntary markets. The clean development mechanism (CDM) is the most common compliance market. Under the Paris Agreement, which came into effect on 1st January 2020, CDMs are referred to as Sustainable Development Mechanisms (SDM).

Compliance carbon projects in Kenya

As of March 2021, forty-two CDM mechanisms had been registered in Kenya

The first CDM project in Kenya was the sugarcane bagasse power generation plant at Mumias Sugar Company.

Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KENGEN) has several projects registered with CDM including:

  • Kiambere Hydro Power Project
  • Tana Hydro Power Station Project
  • Ngong Hills Wind Power
  • Olkaria I, II, and IV Geothermal projects

A digital database of registered CDMS can be found in the UNFCCC DM registry

Voluntary Carbon Projects in Kenya

A majority of the voluntary carbon projects in Kenya are in the forestry sector under REDD+. Examples include:

  • Kasigau Corridor REDD Project (Rukinga Sanctuary)
  • Kasigau Corridor REDD Project (Community ranches)
  • Mikoko Pamoja Mangrove
  • International Small Group & Tree Planting Programme (TIST)
  • Mount Kenya Small Scale Reforestation
  • Forest Again (Kakamega Forest)
  • Chyulu Hills REDD+ Project

Apart from forestry, energy-efficient cookstoves and water filters projects also have a number of carbon trading initiatives. Additionally, agricultural and soil organic carbon projects are also gaining traction.

  • Kenya Agricultural Carbon Project
  • NRT carbon project

It Makes Sense for Kenya to develop its Carbon Trade

A comprehensive list of REDD+ projects in Kenya can be found in the International Database of REDD+ Projects and Programmes

Similarly, some companies in Kenya are voluntarily measuring and offsetting their carbon. For instance, in 2011, Kenya Airways launched a carbon offset program for its passengers from geothermal projects in Kenya.

A significant proportion of Kenya is natural and some is conserved. It would make sense to quantify the environmental services provided by the various lands. Consequently, more areas legible for carbon trading should be identified to further increase the benefit of conservation to local communities.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics. The view in this blog are personal and do not represent the organizations that he is associated with. 

The post Carbon Trading Markets in Kenya appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1303
Importance and Direct Methods of measuring Soil Organic Carbon http://silvica.site/importance-and-direct-methods-of-measuring-soil-organic-carbon/ Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:11:52 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1271 Climate change is a major environmental problem today, and soil organic carbon should have more prominent role in mitigation

The post Importance and Direct Methods of measuring Soil Organic Carbon appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

The implementation of international carbon trading has made the measurement of carbon important to the global economy. In pastoral rangelands, no meaningful way of measuring carbon has been identified. Common carbon sinks include oceans, soils, and vegetation.

Soil organic carbon is an indicator of healthy and fertile soils. Carbon is the 15th most abundant element on the earth’s crust, and fourth in the universe (after hydrogen, helium, and oxygen). On the human body, it is only second to oxygen.

Massive amounts of carbon are stored in the soil in two general forms: inorganic and organic. Inorganic carbon arises from the parent weathered rock, while organic carbon results from living or decomposing carbon compounds. However, the measure of productive soils can be captured from the soil organic carbon content.

Changes in Soil Organic Carbon take a few years and it is difficult to keep track of the trend. Regardless, frequent monitoring using a consistent methodology may help detect changes.

Why should we measure soil organic carbon?

Carbon is perhaps the most important parameter for healthy soil. Keep in mind that plants don’t absorb carbon from the soil but the atmosphere. Instead, the carbon in soil contributes to soil nutrients by adsorbing and desorbing nutrients and providing habitats for microorganisms. In short, measuring SOC helps in assessing the soil’s health. Other reasons for measuring soil organic carbon are:

  1. It is an indicator of the water holding capacity of soils: More SOC means higher water holding capacity
  2. Fight against climate change: As the second most important sink for carbon (after oceans), measuring SOC would help in monitoring the absorption capacity of soils.

Analytical tests for determining total soil organic carbon in soils

In general, methods of measuring soil organic carbon can be classified into two; wet digestion and dry combustion. In wet digestion methods, carbon is oxidized using chemicals while dry combustion methods involve the thermal decomposition of carbonate materials to generate carbon dioxide. Examples of wet methods include Walkley and Black and Photometric methods; while dry combustion includes ignition test and dry combustion.

1.      Walkley and Black Method

The method relies on the oxidation of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) that is acid catalyzed. The heat from the dilution raises the temperature to induce substantial oxidation of carbon to carbon dioxide.

A modified Walkey and Black Method called Meibus uses the same procedure but includes sulphuric acid with K2Cr2O7.

2.      Photometric Method

Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) and sulphuric acid are added to the soil. After cooling for 1 hour, distilled water is added. The solution is measured using a spectrophotometer with varying concentrations of sucrose solution

3.      Gravimetric method – loss on ignition (Ignition Test)

Soil samples are subjected to calcinations for 5 hours at 400℃. Then, samples are weighed and the difference in mass corresponds to soil organic matter.

4.      Dry combustion

Soils are pre-treated with hydrochloric acid to remove inorganic carbon. The soil sample (often 30mg) is placed in a capsule and combusted at 975℃. It uses an automatic analyzer with a thermo conductivity sensor detector (TCD).

Key discussion points

Some of the takeaway points of the different methods of measuring SOC are:

  • Walkley and Black Method is relatively easy and cheap, but inaccurate
  • Generally, wet digestion methods tend to underestimate carbon stocks while gravimetric methods tend to overestimate.
  • Additionally, wet digestion methods use potentially dangerous chemicals such as chromium which could be toxic.
  • The most common measurement of SOC is the ignition test of soil organic matter. However, it is not an accurate measure as carbon makes between 50 and 58% of the soil organic matter.
  • Most organizations (including IPCC) favor dry combustion over the other methods of measuring soil organic carbon
  • Indirect methods of measuring soil organic carbon take less time but are less accurate.

Additional reading

Quantification of Soil Organic Carbon – Comparison of Wet Oxidation and Dry Combustion Methods

A protocol for measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification of soil organic carbon in agricultural landscapes

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post Importance and Direct Methods of measuring Soil Organic Carbon appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1271
Existing Carbon Markets in the World http://silvica.site/existing-carbon-markets-in-the-world/ Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:41:49 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=1260 Climate change is a major environmental problem today, and carbon markets are a plausible solution

The post Existing Carbon Markets in the World appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

Climate change is a major problem in the modern world. It is caused by greenhouse gas emissions; carbon is a major GHG. The atmosphere is one. Therefore, it doesn’t matter where emissions are released or absorbed. The world attempts to address the challenge of climate change by strategies like the Paris Agreement.

Carbon trading is among the common strategy used to tackle climate change.

Carbon markets attempt to address climate change by putting a price on carbon. The currency for carbon trading is a tonne of Carbon dioxide or GHG equivalent (CO2e). A carbon credit refers to either a permit to emit 1 tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent or removal of a carbon dioxide equivalent from the atmosphere.

Article 6 of the Paris Agreement provides a foundation for market-based climate measures approaches.  The existing carbon markets can be categorized into two the regulatory compliance and voluntary carbon markets. As such, two types of credits exist including Voluntary emissions reduction (VER) and Certified emissions reduction (CER).

Regulatory Compliance Carbon Markets

As the name suggests, the regulatory compliance markets use the law to account for greenhouse gas emissions. It is regulated by mandatory national, regional, or international carbon management regimes.

In the compliance markets, offsets of a similar program have the same price based on the dynamics of supply and demand. The World Bank tracks the countries or regions that have implemented the compliance programs through the World Carbon Pricing Dashboard.

The following are examples of regulatory compliance carbon markets:

  • Kyoto Protocol: Three Kyoto Protocol mechanisms are important for the regulatory markets including clean development mechanism (CDM), Joint Implementation, and EU Trading Systems. According to the CDM website, there are over 7,000 such projects in the world. Unlike CDM, Joint Implementation takes place in a country committed to reducing emissions. Examples of Joint Implementation Projects are listed by UNFCCC.
  • The European Union Emissions Trading System: It is the world’s first and biggest carbon market. It works using the cap and trade principle.
  • California Emissions Trading System: Launched in 2013 and helped to reduce California GHG by over 5% in 2017. The official website is found here.
  • Australia Emissions Trading System: Following the Clean Energy Act in 2011, Australia put a price on carbon emissions. The carbon price was effective until 2013 when the scheme was replaced by Emission Reduction Fund, which was not effective in reducing emissions.
  • British Columbia Emissions Trading System:
  • The New Zealand Emissions:
  • A comprehensive list of all countries with carbon taxes and ETS (by 2015) can be found in this article here:

Voluntary Carbon Markets

As the name suggests, voluntary carbon markets include carbon credits used for voluntary purposes instead of regulations. Typically, corporate social responsibility is a key driver for voluntary carbon markets. There is no centralized voluntary carbon credit market as project developers can directly sell credit to buyers, brokers, or retailers.

The sale is voluntary markets are governed by standards, which create methodologies to define and certify projects. Some common standards used in the market include the following:

  • Verified carbon standards (VCS)
  • Plan Vivo
  • The Gold Standard
  • The American Carbon Registry
  • Climate Action Reserve
  • Verified Carbon Standard Program

Each of the standards uses different methodologies for measuring and verifying emission reductions.

Project developers use the standards to turn ideas into projects. Examples of common projects for voluntary carbon markets include REDD+ projects. Like in CDM, voluntary projects can be categorized into industrial gases, energy efficiency, renewable energy, forestry, methane reduction (from coal, landfill, and livestock), and others.

A food company may want to buy credits from a project that promotes sustainable soil techniques while another company may wish to support projects that support rural community livelihoods. The beauty of the voluntary carbon market is that it allows companies to support their cause.  

The price range is variable from 0.3 cents per credit for renewable credits to hundreds of dollars for projects that can lock away carbon for thousands of years (e.g. mineralization projects).

Compliance or voluntary carbon markets

The basic idea of carbon markets and trading is simple, ‘by paying someone else to reduce/absorb greenhouse gasses emission somewhere, the buyer of the offset can compensate for his/her emission’. In practice, there are various complexities, for example in methodologies of accounting for carbon and leakages.

Regardless, existing carbon markets provide an avenue for addressing the pertinent problem of climate change. While the compliance markets provide for ‘assured’ reductions, voluntary markets offer great flexibilities for communities and organizations interested in carbon trading.

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  environmental projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post Existing Carbon Markets in the World appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
1260
The Positive Effects of Coronavirus on the Air Pollution Globally http://silvica.site/positive-effects-of-coronavirus-on-air-pollution/ Sun, 24 May 2020 06:59:50 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=998 The Covid-19 has had a devastating effect globally. Regardless, the positive effects of coronavirus on air pollution are visible.

The post The Positive Effects of Coronavirus on the Air Pollution Globally appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

By David Okul

COVID-19 has brought the world to a standstill. However, the coronavirus has had some positive impacts on the environment, at least in the short-run. One of the significant positive effects of lockdowns is the decline in air pollution.  Even the most densely populated megacities are now witnessing their lowest levels of pollution in several decades.

The scenario can be attributed to a reduction in industrial and commercial activity. Nonetheless, we know that the decrease in air pollution due to the coronavirus is temporary. That notwithstanding, there exists a fundamental connection between coronavirus and pollution. This article focuses on how the virus has contributed to the decline in air pollution.

Lockdowns have resulted in the decline of air pollution

Governments worldwide have ordered billions of people to stay in their residential areas to contain the virus.  Some governments, such as China and Italy, had placed millions of people under strict lockdown. As a result, the world has witnessed a pause in pollution, something it hasn’t experienced in so many years.

Whereas many forms of pollution have declined substantially since the onset of the pandemic, air pollution has recorded the most significant decline. Global reports indicate that air pollution has dropped by 25% during the first month of the pandemic.  Primarily because of the reduction in travel and production. In China alone, the nation has recorded a 30% and 50% decline in carbon and nitrogen oxide emissions.  Following a reduction in air pollution, the world is relatively less vulnerable to climate change, and other associated problems of air pollution.

Better still, the world has arguably experienced the best air quality in the recent past. European Space Agency (ESA) and NASA have been monitoring air pollution during the first phase of the pandemic. The two bodies concluded that carbon emissions had dropped significantly, and the world is enjoying the best possible air quality.

Clear blue skies

Air pollution usually obscures the skyline, particularly in major industrial cities worldwide. However, this hasn’t been the case since the pandemic hit the world. Nitrogen levels in industrial cities such as Los Angeles, Shanghai, and Berlin have plummeted since the start of the pandemic. Smog is clearing up over cities that were once labeled as pollution havens.

Since the start of lockdowns and quarantines, industries have slowed down their activities. As a result, some high-rise buildings that had been covered by smog for years are now visible from miles away. In Jakarta, the Philippines, air pollutants had plummeted by 180% since the Philippine government introduced quarantine measures in March 2020.

 Before these measures came into effect, the city’s skyline was synonymous with fog.  But the pandemic has led to the disappearance of the fog. 

Reduction in pollution-related deaths

Pollution accounts for over 4 million deaths worldwide. Some of the pollution-related ailments include lung cancer, heart disease, stroke, and other types of chronic respiratory conditions. Since a significant size of the world’s population lives in pollution-prone areas, billions of people are vulnerable to pollution-related ailments.

 There has been a substantial decline in all forms of pollution since COVID-19, as demonstrated by a Chinese study. Moreover, the number of people succumbing to pollution-related deaths has recorded a sharp decline even as coronavirus takes its toll on human life. Nevertheless, the reduction in pollution-related deaths is temporary thanks to the measures introduced to combat COVID 19. Therefore, a long-term approach must be embraced to ensure the trend continues long after the pandemic.

coronavirus positive effect on decline of air pollution
A town in China showing air pollution levels after and before the covid-19 lockdowns

Slashed greenhouse emissions

Greenhouse gas emissions have declined sharply, owing to reduced air and road traffic.  For instance, China reduced its CO2 emissions by 25% because of the crises. In Europe, CO2 emissions from electricity reduced by 39% while India’s carbon emissions fell for the first time in forty years. There are numerous stats on the effect of lower emissions levels from the coronavirus. Perhaps the most remarkable stat is that COVID-19 has six times more impact on carbon emissions when compared to the financial crisis of 2008. 

However, it would be a fallacy to insinuate that greenhouse gas emissions reduction is a substantial environmental improvement.  After all, the emissions will ultimately rise to their past levels once the pandemic reaches an end.  Nevertheless, green coronavirus recovery measures will help reduce emissions levels and maybe be better for the economy! 

To reiterate, the coronavirus has not reduced GHG in the atmosphere. In May 2020, National Geographic reported atmospheric greenhouse gases were at 418 parts per million- the highest in recorded history. Reduction of GHG from the atmosphere will require reduce of emissions over longer period of time. 

In short, coronavirus has led to reduced pollutants in the air

The air pollution effects of the novel COVID 19 are crystal clear. While the virus is responsible for a devastating global misery, it has provided a reprieve as far as pollution is concerned. Globally, the world is experiencing its lowest levels of pollution in modern, thanks to COVID 19. That is not to say that we want the virus to persist. Instead, we should appreciate that it is possible to reduce air pollution, a critical contributor to climate change.  

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post The Positive Effects of Coronavirus on the Air Pollution Globally appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
998
15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development http://silvica.site/nature-based-solutions-examples/ Thu, 21 May 2020 18:17:14 +0000 http://silvica.site/?p=958 We have developed 15 examples of nature-based solutions that we think could help in reducing pressures in the environment

The post 15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>

The concept of nature-based solutions (NBS) could be confusing and abstract. After all, from fossil fuels to plastics, humans have always relied on nature for development. Regardless, the European Union defines NBS as ‘actions which are inspired by, supported by or copied from nature.’ A more detailed article on NbS definition is also published in Silvica. An advantage of nature-based solutions is that they are ready to be deployed. We have outlined nature-based solutions examples in this post.

1.      Tree Growing

Growing trees is a solution to a myriad of contemporary challenges. Chief among them is mitigating the effects of climate change. Trees are plants, so they absorb carbon dioxide through the process of photosynthesis. Planting billions of trees around the world is one of the most practical ways of absorbing excessive amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Scientists estimate that 1.7 billion hectares of current treeless lands have a potential for tree growth.  As a nature-based solution example, tree planting also assists in improving biodiversity, soil, air, and water quality.

2.      Renewable energy

The types of renewable energy that could be useful NBS include solar, wind, hydroelectricity, and biofuels power. The advantages of renewable energy are aplenty. For starters, renewable energy produces lesser emissions compared to fossil fuels. Additionally, renewable energy sources are flexible in the sense that they can be powered using local resources. The continuous maturation of the renewable energy sector means that the costs of renewables will keep decreasing with time.

3.      Beekeeping

As a nature-based solution example, beekeeping does tick most of the boxes. When evaluated against the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), beekeeping can help achieve SDGs one, two, three, five, eight, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, and fifteen. The sad news is that bees are disappearing, yet they are vital components of our ecosystem. For instance, they are significant pollinators of flowering plants.

Have you ever watched the Silence of the Bees documentary? 

4.      Ecotourism

Is it possible for your travel to benefit the local community and the environment at the same time? Yes, it is! When you practice ecotourism, communities and conservation benefit. The International Ecotourism Society defines it as ‘responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the wellbeing of the local people, and involves interpretation and education.’ The problem is that there is a lot of greenwashing in ecotourism. Operators would offer mass tourism but market it as ecotourism. As a traveler, ensure that you do your research well.

Watch a video about Ecotourism 

5.      Payment for Ecosystem Services

Environmental services can be categorized into ecological goods, regulating services, supporting services, and cultural services. Presently, environmental benefits are undervalued or lack value in the financial realm. A central principle in PES is for the environmental services’ beneficiaries to ‘pay’ for the conservation of the same resources. Under PES schemes, farmers and landowners receive payments after implementing previously agreed actions that provide ecological services.

6.      Carbon financing (REDD+ projects)

Carbon financing is an example of PES. It is inevitable for companies to emit carbon into the atmosphere. Regardless, responsible emitters have the option of buying carbon credits from the voluntary markets in carbon financing. For instance, companies could purchase credits from verified REDD+ (reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) projects.

Deforestation is responsible for 15% of global greenhouse emissions; thus, stopping deforestation has a significant impact on the carbon equation. Remember, about 80% of above-ground terrestrial carbon stocks and 40% of soil carbon are in forest ecosystems.

7.      Protected areas

Protected areas are the backbone of biodiversity conservation. National parks, conservancies, reserves, ranches, and community conservation areas are among the most common types of protected areas. The coronavirus pandemic supports the idea of respecting and protecting biodiversity. We have the obligation of setting aside significant wilderness areas where biodiversity could thrive. If not, we may interact with dangerous pathogens as the biodiversity will attempt to survive amongst us.

8.      Avoid plastic products as such as possible.

Plastic is a bad boy of global pollution. As such, we should focus on choosing alternatives to plastic when possible or avoiding plastic altogether. Some plausible environment-friendly options include glass, stainless steel, natural fiber cloth, wood, and paper. It is difficult to completely do away with plastic because it lurks in a variety of products, including chewing gums, metal containers, food packaging, diapers, personal care products, cigarette filters, glue, and medical equipment.

9.      Restoring whale population

Surprisingly, whales conservation has an enormous impact on climate change. One whale absorbs up to 33,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide. In comparison, a tree absorbs up to 22 kgs of carbon a year. Moreover, phytoplanktons follow whales. More whales imply more phytoplankton, and phytoplanktons absorb as much as 40% of all carbon dioxide. 

10. Agroforestry

As the name suggests, agroforestry is a combination of agriculture and forestry. In other words, it involves the integration of trees and crops/livestock in the same land. There are plenty of reasons why a farmer would choose to add trees to his/her farming system. Chief among them is soil conservation and additional products from the trees. As one of the nature-based solutions examples, agroforestry is implementable in existing farming systems.

11. Green roofs

Green roofs refer to vegetation cover grown on rooftops. They are also called rooftop gardens or living roofs. The natural-based solution example is particularly relevant to urban dwellers. Green roofs help reduce energy costs as they insulate buildings. Moreover, they assist in reducing the runoff from storms or snows. A typical metropolitan area produces more than five times more runoff compared to a rural area. Green roofs make urban areas ‘less typical’.

12. Urban gardens and green spaces

Like green roofs, urban gardens and green spaces are nature-based solutions for towns and cities. Home gardens have the benefit of improving the food security of an area. According to the World Health Organization, urban green spaces reduce environmental hazards, improve the quality of life of the urban regions, and improve residents’ wellbeing.

13. Organic farming

Conventional agriculture has various adverse effects on the environment. For instance, the use of inorganic fertilizers harms groundwater and biodiversity. In contrast, organic farming reduces some of the negative impacts of modern agriculture as it involves growing crops with reduced or no fertilizer and other synthetic inputs. Consequently, organic farming is compatible with biodiversity conservation.

14. Green infrastructure

The United States Environmental Protection Agency defines green infrastructure as ‘the range of measures that use plant or soil systems, permeable pavement or other permeable surfaces or substrates, stormwater harvest and reuse, or landscaping to store, infiltrate, or evapotranspirate stormwater and reduce flows to sewer systems or to surface waters.’ As such, measures such as green roofs and tree growing in urban areas fall under green infrastructure. Many forward-looking cities are implementing green infrastructure.

15. Green Economy

The end game for the nature-based solution is the transition to a green economy. The focus of a green economy is sustainable consumption and production, social inclusion, resource efficiency, and reduced emissions.

Watch this video to understand Green Economy better. 

Nature-based solutions present practical ways to deal with current environmental problems. However, NBS should complement other actions, not replace them. Policies re important in ensuring that we implement NBS. Regardless, the personal initiative could also enhance the implementation of a green economy. Ask yourself, ‘what natural-based solution examples can I implement to promote sustainable development?’   

David Okul is an environmental management professional with over 10 years experience on donor projects, conservation, forestry, ecotourism, and community-based natural resources management. When not working on  active environmental management projects, I spend my time writing for Silvica on a variety of topics.

The post 15 nature-based solutions examples for sustainable development appeared first on Silvica: Blog for Sustainable Development .

]]>
958